Back to Dashboard

BNW

Utilities

Công ty Cổ phần Nước sạch Bắc Ninh

Điện, nước & xăng dầu khí đốtNước & Khí đốtCT
18.000
VND · Last close
Valuation Verdict
Undervalued
Low
+16.2%
-120%Fair Value+120%
Current
18.000
Intrinsic Value
20.924
ModelDDM 3STAGE

See how this valuation was built

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

See how the value moves with WACC and growth

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor
Research Note

BNW: Regulated water utility with steady cash flows but concentrated ownership and liquidity constraints

Intrinsic value VND 19,761 vs market VND 17,000 — implied upside 16.2% (model confidence: low).

Business Overview

Công ty Cổ phần Nước sạch Bắc Ninh (BNW) is a provincially linked water utility listed on UPCOM providing potable water to Bắc Ninh province and adjacent areas. Its business is asset- and concession-like: regulated pricing, long-lived infrastructure and high fixed-cost base. Revenue grew from VND 254.5 bn in 2023 to VND 296.1 bn in 2025, reflecting modest volume and tariff dynamics within a local monopoly footprint.

The company retains characteristics typical of Vietnamese utilities and SOE-linked providers: meaningful state ownership (Ủy Ban Nhân Dân Tỉnh Bắc Ninh holds 49.06%) and a large strategic investor position (Công ty Cổ Phần Tập Đoàn Long Phương 40.33%), limited foreign room (0.0%), and low trading liquidity (avg volume 2w: 4,351 shares). VAS accounting and local regulatory rate-setting, plus potential provincial payout mandates, are relevant to earnings and dividend dynamics for shareholders.

Investment Thesis

BNW offers a predictable, dividend-heavy cash flow profile underpinned by regulated tariffs and a local monopoly. The modelled intrinsic value is VND 19,761 per share implying 16.2% upside versus the market price of VND 17,000; the DDM inputs rely on a reported DPS of VND 1,560 (source: events), a cost of equity of 10.7% and a terminal growth of 3.5%.

That said, several factors temper conviction. The model's confidence is low and was recalibrated (calibration_method: isotonic) — the valuation also flagged illiquid trading. Earnings quality sits at 55.3/100, which is middling; ROE is 8.3% while the payout ratio is unusually high at 165.12%, implying dividends have materially outpaced retained earnings and raising sustainability questions. Balance-sheet leverage (Debt/Equity 1.25) is moderate but meaningful for a regulated utility.

Given the 16.2% implied upside, the return does not adequately compensate for execution and liquidity risk given concentrated ownership (two shareholders control ~89% of listed free float) and zero foreign room. The upside falls into the mid-single-digit conviction band relative to our thresholds and the model confidence is low, so investors should treat the intrinsic estimate cautiously and prioritise dividend visibility and confirmation of future payout policy before increasing exposure.

Valuation Commentary

Three-stage dividend-discount model (DDM) calibrated with isotonic adjustment to reconcile raw model output with market-observed features.

  • DPS used: VND 1,560 (source: events)
  • Cost of equity (Ke): 10.7% composed of RF 4.36%, ERP 4.38%, CRP 2.75% and beta 0.82
  • Base/terminal growth: 3.5% (terminal_g and effective floor)
  • ROE input: 8.82% in growth components and reported ROE 8.33% in ratios
  • Terminal value share: TV_pct = 0.6679 (66.79% of intrinsic value in terminal stage)

The DDM yields an intrinsic value of VND 19,761 (raw_intrinsic_value VND 22,420 before isotonic calibration) implying 16.2% upside. Confidence is low due to illiquidity, the high reported payout ratio (165.12%) and reliance on a single-year DPS event; as such the valuation should be treated as directional rather than precise.

Bull vs Bear

Bull Case
  • Stable regulated cash flows: Revenue grew to VND 296.1 bn in 2025 with net margins supporting DPS of VND 1,560, making dividends credible in the near term.
  • Predictable terminal value: Two-thirds of value sits in terminal (TV_pct 66.79%), consistent with long life of water assets and steady terminal growth of 3.5%.
  • Attractive relative multiples: EV/EBITDA 8.3 and P/E 18.6 are reasonable for a regulated utility with visible cash returns.
  • Provincial support: 49.06% ownership by the Provincial People's Committee may underpin tariff negotiations and concession stability.
Bear Case
  • Dividend sustainability concern: Reported payout ratio is 165.12%, implying dividends exceed earnings on a trailing basis and may be one-off or unsustainable.
  • Concentrated ownership and zero foreign room: Two shareholders (49.06% + 40.33%) control the company, limiting free-float and strategic optionality for minority holders.
  • Liquidity and valuation confidence: UPCOM listing with avg vol 4,351 shares (2w) and an 'illiquid' sanity flag reduces ability to enter/exit positions and contributed to model confidence being low.
  • Earnings volatility: Net profit fell from VND 51.3 bn in 2024 to VND 35.0 bn in 2025 despite revenue growth, highlighting operating margin and cost drivers that could pressure cashflows.

Sector Context

The water & gas utilities subsector in Vietnam is dominated by regionally regulated operators where tariffs are set or influenced by local authorities and long-term investment cycles drive value. SBV credit growth quotas and provincial budgeting can affect capex financing for utilities; some peers leverage VAMC or state-backed lending for balance-sheet management. VAS accounting differences (e.g., treatment of government grants, concession assets and depreciation) can create comparability issues across peers.

Peer median implied upside in our coverage is 16.6%, broadly similar to BNW's 16.2%. Top peers show a wide dispersion (PSH implied upside 63.2%, PPC/SJD ~29.3% with mixed confidence), underscoring idiosyncratic regulatory and operational drivers across local water players. For BNW specifically, zero foreign room and UPCOM listing constraints place it at the less liquid end of the peer set.

Risk Factors

  • Dividend sustainability risk: payout_ratio 165.12% — DPS exceeds earnings and may not be repeatable.
  • Liquidity risk: average trading volume (2w) 4,351 and 'illiquid' sanity flag increase execution risk.
  • Concentrated ownership: Ủy Ban Nhân Dân Tỉnh Bắc Ninh 49.06% + Long Phương 40.33% limits free float and could result in related-party decision-making.
  • Earnings volatility: net profit dropped from VND 51.3 bn (2024) to VND 35.0 bn (2025) despite revenue growth to VND 296.1 bn.
  • Regulatory/tariff risk: as a local water provider, margins depend on provincial tariff-setting and potential political mandates (e.g., preferential supply, mandated dividends).
  • Valuation model risk: model confidence is low and calibration materially reduced raw intrinsic value from VND 22,420 to VND 19,761.

Catalysts

  • Confirmation of a sustainable dividend policy or guidance that reduces payout uncertainty (DPS repeatability).
  • Improvement in liquidity or migration to HoSE/HNX that increases investor access and narrows liquidity premium.
  • Positive regulatory decisions (tariff increases or favourable concession extensions) that improve ROE above current ~8.3%.
  • Operational improvements that translate to margin recovery and net profit normalization above VND 51.3 bn levels observed in 2024.

Forensic Assessment

No Beneish M-Score is available (mscore: null) and there are no flagged forensic red signals in the input. Earnings quality at 55.3/100 is middling — not a clear forensic alarm but not high quality either; this aligns with the unusually high payout ratio and the drop in net profit from 2024 to 2025. Given concentrated state and strategic investor ownership and UPCOM listing, the principal forensic concern is limited transparency and minority-protection rather than explicit accounting manipulation signals.

Track Record

The model's historical track record over nine years shows a hit rate of 25% and an average realised upside of -3.3%, indicating a modestly poor historical performance and low directional reliability. Users should therefore treat the current intrinsic estimate as indicative and weigh company-specific due diligence (dividend sustainability, tariff outlook, owner intentions) more heavily than model output alone.

Written by a language model on 2026-08-10 from this page’s own model outputs and financial statements, and may quote figures from that date. Descriptive analysis, not investment advice — no buy, sell or hold recommendation is given or implied.

See the statements behind the number

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

See the 2015-present track record

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor

See the earnings-quality breakdown

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

Financial Forensics

Beneish M-Score · 2025

Low Risk
M -2.03 · 65th pctile vs peers
YoY ▲ +0.28
Conservative vs VN peersAggressive
Compare across the whole market

Ranked vs Vietnamese peers. The −1.78 Beneish cutoff is US-calibrated; ~28% of VN stocks exceed it.

DSRI
1.854
GMI
1.252
AQI
0.473
SGI
1.032
DEPI
1.140
SGAI
1.002
TATA
-0.060
LVGI
1.064

See the Piotroski, Altman and DuPont detail

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

Key Ratios

Fiscal year 2025
20.19P/E
P/B1.64
P/S2.28
ROE8.3%
ROA3.8%
EPS931.51
BVPS10997.08
Gross Margin24.8%
Net Margin11.8%
D/E1.25
Current Ratio1.04
Rev Growth3.2%
Profit Growth-31.8%
EV/EBITDA8.84
Div Yield3.9%

Company Overview

Issued Shares
37.5M
Charter Capital
375.5B VND
Sector (ICB L2)
Điện, nước & xăng dầu khí đốt
Industry (ICB L3)
Nước & Khí đốt
Sub-industry
Nước
Company Type
CT

See who owns this company, and what else they own

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor
Computed 28/08/2026
Methodology & Disclosure

vnvalue is a methodology engine — not an advisor. Every number is the deterministic output of a published formula applied to public financial data. Nothing on this page constitutes investment, financial, legal, or tax advice, nor a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security.

All data, models, and outputs are provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions. Past performance and historical valuations are not indicative of future results.

By using vnvalue you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Full disclaimer →