Back to Dashboard

GCB

Utilities

Công ty Cổ phần PETEC Bình Định

Điện, nước & xăng dầu khí đốtNước & Khí đốtCT
6.600
VND · Last close
Valuation Verdict
Undervalued
Low
+26.7%
-120%Fair Value+120%
Current
6.600
Intrinsic Value
8.365
ModelDDM 3STAGE

See how this valuation was built

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

See how the value moves with WACC and growth

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor
Research Note

PETEC Bình Định (GCB): deep value on accounting metrics but execution and liquidity risks cap conviction

Intrinsic value VND 7,351 vs market VND 5,800 — implied upside 26.7% (model confidence: low).

Business Overview

Công ty Cổ phần PETEC Bình Định (GCB) is an UPCOM-listed utility company in the Water & Gas sub‑sector (ICB: Nước & Khí đốt). The firm operates in regulated/contracted utility segments with episodic revenue tied to project activity and commodity-linked inputs. GCB has 4,039,147 shares outstanding and trades on UPCOM, where liquidity is limited and foreign ownership room is closed (foreign_room 0.0).

Investment Thesis

Valuation: our three-stage DDM produces an intrinsic value of VND 7,351 per share (implied upside 26.7% to the match price VND 5,800) using DPS VND 1,600 (source: events), cost of equity 10.7%, base and terminal growth 3.5%, and an ROE input of 9.08%. The model flags low confidence and was isotonic‑calibrated from a raw intrinsic of VND 22,994.9 to account for illiquidity and earnings quality concerns.

Fundamentals: recent financials show a highly volatile top line — revenue fell from VND 1,626.8 bn in 2023 to VND 714.4 bn in 2025 (2025 revenue VND 714.4 bn), while net profit swung from VND 6.8 bn (2023) to negative VND 1.4 bn (2024) and back to VND 9.0 bn (2025). Profitability ratios are thin: Net profit margin 1.26%, EBIT margin 0.35%, ROA 1.99% and ROE 11.19%. Market multiples look depressed (P/E 2.6x; P/B 0.28x) but EV/EBITDA is elevated at 68.8x, reflecting low EBITDA or accounting timing effects. Earnings quality is low (18.8/100), consistent with the model's sanity flags.

Risks to thesis: liquidity and governance materially limit conviction. Trading is illiquid (avg_volume_2w 22,392) on UPCOM and foreign_room is 0.0. Ownership is concentrated: the top five individuals together hold ~63.0% (top holder 31.54%). Combined with low earnings quality and the model's recalibrated confidence label of "low", the 26.7% upside is attractive on paper but execution and disclosure risks reduce our conviction.

Valuation Commentary

Three-stage dividend discount model calibrated isotonicly to control for illiquidity and low earnings quality; intrinsic value reflects DPS VND 1,600 and a cost of equity of 10.7%.

  • DPS input: VND 1,600 (events)
  • Cost of equity: 10.7% (rf 4.36%, ERP 4.38%, CRP 2.75%, beta 0.82)
  • Base and terminal growth: 3.5%
  • ROE used in growth blend: 9.08%; payout ratio 95.06%
  • Model calibration reduced raw intrinsic from VND 22,994.9 to VND 7,351 due to illiquidity and low earnings quality

The model implies 26.7% upside but flags low confidence because of illiquidity and weak earnings quality; the raw (uncalibrated) model produced a materially higher intrinsic (VND 22,994.9), indicating sensitivity to calibration choices. Treat the intrinsic as an indicative floor rather than a high‑confidence target.

Bull vs Bear

Bull Case
  • Discounted market multiples: P/E 2.6x and P/B 0.28x imply the market prices in deep asset/earnings distress.
  • Model upside 26.7% to intrinsic VND 7,351, supported by a steady DPS input of VND 1,600 (events).
  • ROE of 11.19% provides a cushion for sustainable returns if revenue volatility eases.
Bear Case
  • Low earnings quality (18.8/100) and model sanity flags include "low_earnings_quality" and "illiquid".
  • Volatile revenue: down from VND 1,626.8 bn (2023) to VND 714.4 bn (2025) and swinging net profit (VND -1.4 bn in 2024).
  • Severe liquidity constraints: trades on UPCOM with avg_volume_2w 22,392 and foreign_room 0.0; trading illiquidity capped upside in the model.
  • High ownership concentration (top holder 31.54%; top five ~63.0%) increases execution and related‑party risk.

Sector Context

GCB sits in Vietnam's utilities cluster (Nước & Khí đốt) where revenues can be regulated or project‑linked. Comparable sector valuation dispersion is wide: peer median implied upside is 16.6% while some peers show >29% upside (e.g., PPC, SJD) and others negative. For utilities, Vietnamese-specific considerations matter: VAS accounting treatment of government subsidies and construction-in-progress can distort margins; state bank credit quotas and SOE payout mandates can influence financing and dividend behavior for related firms. On UPCOM, illiquidity is common; foreign ownership slots are often constrained (here 0.0), limiting demand from offshore allocators.

Risk Factors

  • Low earnings quality (18.8/100) — financials may contain timing, one-offs or accounting items that reduce forecast reliability.
  • Severe liquidity constraints (UPCOM listing, avg_volume_2w 22,392) — large trades could move price materially and hamper exit.
  • Concentrated ownership: top shareholder 31.54% and top five ~63.0% — potential related‑party transactions or governance entrenchment.
  • Revenue volatility: revenue declined to VND 714.4 bn in 2025 from VND 1,626.8 bn in 2023, increasing execution risk for earnings recovery.
  • No foreign room (0.0) — limits access to foreign capital flows that might re-rate the stock.
  • Model calibration sensitivity: raw intrinsic VND 22,994.9 vs calibrated VND 7,351 shows valuation is sensitive to input and illiquidity adjustments.

Catalysts

  • Stabilization or recovery in revenue and EBITDA in FY2026 reporting that demonstrates earnings quality improvement.
  • Corporate action increasing liquidity or unlocking value (listing upgrade from UPCOM to HOSE/HSX or share consolidation).
  • Reduction in ownership concentration or clearer disclosure on related‑party transactions.
  • Announcements of sustainable dividend policy consistent with DPS VND 1,600 used in the model.

Forensic Assessment

No Beneish M‑Score data provided (mscore null). However, the model raised explicit sanity flags for "low_earnings_quality" and "illiquid", and the earnings_quality metric is low at 18.8/100. Given those signals plus volatile revenue and profit swings (net profit: VND 6.8 bn in 2023 -> -VND 1.4 bn in 2024 -> VND 9.0 bn in 2025), the primary forensic concern is earnings quality and disclosure transparency rather than an identified statistical manipulation score. Monitor related‑party transactions and note concentrated insider ownership (top holder 31.54%).

Track Record

The model has a 10‑year track record with a hit_rate of 66.7% and an average upside of 20.9% across the period. While the hit_rate is above 50%, calibration adjustments and the current low confidence rating mean historical performance should be treated with caution for this specific illiquid UPCOM case.

Written by a language model on 2026-08-10 from this page’s own model outputs and financial statements, and may quote figures from that date. Descriptive analysis, not investment advice — no buy, sell or hold recommendation is given or implied.

See the statements behind the number

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

See the 2015-present track record

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor

See the earnings-quality breakdown

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

Financial Forensics

Beneish M-Score · 2025

Low Risk
M -1.92 · 68th pctile vs peers
YoY -3.06
Conservative vs VN peersAggressive
Compare across the whole market

Ranked vs Vietnamese peers. The −1.78 Beneish cutoff is US-calibrated; ~28% of VN stocks exceed it.

DSRI
1.870
GMI
0.812
AQI
0.899
SGI
0.586
DEPI
0.906
SGAI
1.160
TATA
0.062
LVGI
0.954

See the Piotroski, Altman and DuPont detail

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

Key Ratios

Fiscal year 2025
2.97P/E
P/B0.32
P/S0.04
ROE11.2%
ROA2.0%
EPS2220.86
BVPS20923.67
Gross Margin3.1%
Net Margin1.3%
D/E4.03
Current Ratio1.13
EV/EBITDA69.51
Div Yield0.0%

Company Overview

Issued Shares
4.0M
Charter Capital
40.4B VND
Sector (ICB L2)
Điện, nước & xăng dầu khí đốt
Industry (ICB L3)
Nước & Khí đốt
Sub-industry
Phân phối xăng dầu & khí đốt
Company Type
CT

See who owns this company, and what else they own

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor
Computed 28/08/2026
Methodology & Disclosure

vnvalue is a methodology engine — not an advisor. Every number is the deterministic output of a published formula applied to public financial data. Nothing on this page constitutes investment, financial, legal, or tax advice, nor a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security.

All data, models, and outputs are provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions. Past performance and historical valuations are not indicative of future results.

By using vnvalue you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Full disclaimer →