Back to Dashboard

ILC

Consumer

Công ty Cổ phần Hợp tác lao động với nước ngoài

Hàng & Dịch vụ Công nghiệpTư vấn & Hỗ trợ Kinh doanhCT
5.000
VND · Last close
Valuation Verdict
Undervalued
Low
+12.1%
-120%Fair Value+120%
Current
5.000
Intrinsic Value
5.605
ModelFCF DCF

See how this valuation was built

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

See how the value moves with WACC and growth

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor
Research Note

ILC: Small, illiquid consulting play with limited upside and elevated forensic concerns

Intrinsic value VND 7,847 vs market VND 7,000 — implied upside 12.1% (model confidence: low).

Business Overview

Công ty Cổ phần Hợp tác lao động với nước ngoài (ILC) is a small UPCoM-listed company in the consumer / business consulting & support services space (ICB: Tư vấn & Hỗ trợ Kinh doanh). The company had revenue of VND 159.4 bn in 2025 after a trough in 2024 of VND 143.6 bn, and operates with modest profitability: net profit of VND 4.0 bn in 2025 and EPS of VND 662 per share. Total assets were VND 107.5 bn at end-2025.

Investment Thesis

1) Valuation implies modest upside but low conviction: our blended intrinsic value is VND 7,847 (DCF/PE blend) vs the match price VND 7,000, giving a 12.1% upside. However, model confidence is explicitly flagged as low and several sanity flags ("illiquid", "low_earnings_quality", "manipulation_risk") reduce conviction.

2) Mixed operating performance and weak cash conversion: revenue recovered from VND 143.6 bn in 2024 to VND 159.4 bn in 2025, but revenue growth is negative on a three-year view (Revenue YoY -22.1%). Margins are slim — EBIT margin ~1.3% and net margin ~2.6% — while ROE is 6.7% and ROA 4.1%, which are modest for a services company and leave limited room for valuation expansion.

3) Forensic and liquidity risks materially offset upside: Beneish M-Score (-1.6554), earnings quality 13.1/100, and an Altman Z-Score in the grey zone (2.94) all raise concern about earnings sustainability and accounting quality. Trading liquidity is poor (avg volume 252 shares over 2 weeks) and foreign ownership room is 0.0%, constraining potential demand from institutional foreign buyers.

4) Balance-sheet nuance is mixed: net cash is reported (net_debt = negative VND 44,552,949,696 in model inputs), and P/B at 0.7x suggests the market values the company below book. But EV/EBITDA is negative, reflecting low/volatile operating earnings and making enterprise-value-based comps less informative.

Valuation Commentary

Blended DCF and P/E approach — 70% weight to a 10-year DCF with WACC 10% and terminal growth 4%, 30% weight to a P/E-based target (fair P/E 5x).

  • Base FCF starting point: VND 4,077,124,220 (company-level base free cash flow from model inputs)
  • WACC 10.0% and terminal growth 4.0% (model_inputs)
  • Blend: DCF intrinsic VND 18,954.1 per share (70%) and P/E intrinsic VND 3,308.5 per share (30%)
  • Net cash position reported in model inputs (net_debt = -VND 44,552,949,696) which supports a lower equity risk premium on a small scale

The 12.1% implied upside reflects a conservative blend and the market's discount for illiquidity and execution/forensic risk. Confidence is low, so the intrinsic estimate should be treated as directional rather than precise — downside from earnings deterioration or further forensic red flags could easily erase this modest premium.

Bull vs Bear

Bull Case
  • Modest balance-sheet cushion: model inputs show net_debt = -VND 44,552,949,696 (net cash), reducing immediate solvency risk.
  • Valuation gap exists: intrinsic value VND 7,847 vs market VND 7,000 implies 12.1% upside if execution and accounts hold.
  • P/B of 0.7x suggests potential upside if profitability (ROE 6.7%) improves toward peer medians.
Bear Case
  • Forensic flags are material: Beneish M-Score -1.6554 (above the -1.78 threshold), earnings quality 13.1/100, and Altman Z-Score 2.94 indicate manipulation risk and grey-zone distress.
  • Operating profitability is thin: EBIT margin 1.3% and net margin 2.6% with Revenue YoY -22.1% over the recent period.
  • Illiquidity and ownership constraints: average two-week volume 252 shares and foreign ownership room 0.0% limit access to capital and tradability.
  • Negative/unstable operating cash dynamics: EV/EBITDA is negative, and cash-conversion signals in the earnings-quality profile are near zero, increasing downside if receivables or working capital worsen.

Sector Context

ILC sits in the domestic consulting & business-support cluster where comparables range from illiquid micro-caps to larger advisory firms. Peer universe shows wide dispersion (sector median upside ~12.0%), reflecting diverse business models and liquidity profiles. Vietnamese accounting under VAS can mask economic performance (differences in provisions, related-party transactions and revaluation practices are common), so forensic checks are especially important for small UPCoM names.

Regulatory and market context matters: SBV credit growth quotas and state-owned-enterprise (SOE) payout mandates can shape liquidity and investor flows across the market. For small firms like ILC, foreign room at 0.0% removes a potential buyer class. Similar micro-caps often show material bid-ask spreads and episodic trading driven by local shareholders rather than institutional flows.

Risk Factors

  • Aggressive accounting/manipulation risk: Beneish M-Score -1.6554 (> -1.78 threshold) and year-on-year M-Score deterioration (+0.39) point to elevated risk that reported earnings may not be sustainable.
  • Very low earnings quality: score 13.1/100 with cash conversion and receivables both near 0/100, implying reported profits may lack cash backing.
  • Illiquidity: avg_volume_2w = 252 shares; thin market depth increases execution risk and can widen effective trading costs.
  • Concentrated ownership: top shareholder holds 24.97% (Trịnh Thị Nga), and top five collectively control a large block, which can limit free-float and increase governance risk.
  • Negative/volatile operating metrics: Revenue YoY -22.1% and EV/EBITDA negative, limiting valuation comparability and increasing sensitivity to small earnings moves.
  • Zero foreign room: foreign_room 0.0% removes a buyer base, reducing potential rerating catalysts from international investors.
  • Model confidence low: valuation confidence flagged as low and sanity flags (illiquid, low_earnings_quality, manipulation_risk) reduce reliance on the intrinsic estimate.

Catalysts

  • Audit/forensic transparency: publication of audited statements with clean auditor commentary or additional cash-flow disclosure could reduce manipulation concerns and lift confidence.
  • Improvement in operating cash conversion or clearer receivables collection could materially improve earnings quality scores.
  • Any corporate action increasing free float or opening foreign room (e.g., share restructuring) would expand potential demand.

Forensic Assessment

Forensic indicators are the primary concern. Beneish M-Score at -1.6554 crosses the conventional manipulation threshold (-1.78), placing ILC in the 76th percentile among peers for manipulation risk and showing a year-on-year deterioration (+0.39). Earnings Quality at 13.1/100 is very low, with cash conversion and receivables metrics effectively zero, suggesting reported profits may not be supported by cash flows. Altman Z-Score of 2.94 sits in the grey zone, implying elevated bankruptcy risk compared with healthy peers. In short, the forensic picture significantly undermines confidence in reported earnings and the intrinsic estimate.

Track Record

Model track record across 9 years shows a hit_rate of 37.5% (3.4/9 roughly), which is below parity and indicates limited directional reliability. The historical average upside when the model was correct is high (avg_upside_pct 98.63%), but given the low hit rate and the company's pronounced forensic and liquidity risks, past upside outcomes are not a strong indicator of future performance.

Written by a language model on 2026-08-10 from this page’s own model outputs and financial statements, and may quote figures from that date. Descriptive analysis, not investment advice — no buy, sell or hold recommendation is given or implied.

See the statements behind the number

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

See the 2015-present track record

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor

See the earnings-quality breakdown

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

Financial Forensics

Beneish M-Score · 2025

Moderate
M -1.66 · 76th pctile vs peers
YoY ▲ +0.39
Conservative vs VN peersAggressive
Compare across the whole market

Ranked vs Vietnamese peers. The −1.78 Beneish cutoff is US-calibrated; ~28% of VN stocks exceed it.

DSRI
1.310
GMI
1.069
AQI
0.557
SGI
1.110
DEPI
0.129
SGAI
0.935
TATA
0.158
LVGI
1.198

Read the forensic analysis

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor

See the Piotroski, Altman and DuPont detail

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

Key Ratios

Fiscal year 2025
7.58P/E
P/B0.49
P/S0.19
ROE6.7%
ROA4.1%
EPS661.69
BVPS10142.36
Gross Margin9.0%
Net Margin2.6%
D/E0.73
Current Ratio2.36
EV/EBITDA-5.64
Div Yield0.0%

Company Overview

Issued Shares
6.1M
Charter Capital
60.8B VND
Sector (ICB L2)
Hàng & Dịch vụ Công nghiệp
Industry (ICB L3)
Tư vấn & Hỗ trợ Kinh doanh
Sub-industry
Đào tạo & Việc làm
Company Type
CT

See who owns this company, and what else they own

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor
Computed 28/08/2026
Methodology & Disclosure

vnvalue is a methodology engine — not an advisor. Every number is the deterministic output of a published formula applied to public financial data. Nothing on this page constitutes investment, financial, legal, or tax advice, nor a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security.

All data, models, and outputs are provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions. Past performance and historical valuations are not indicative of future results.

By using vnvalue you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Full disclaimer →