Back to Dashboard

LDG

Real Estate

Công ty Cổ phần Đầu tư LDG

Bất động sảnCT
2.700
VND · Last close
Valuation Verdict
Undervalued
High
+34.8%
-120%Fair Value+120%
Current
2.700
Intrinsic Value
3.641
ModelDCF LEVERAGE SCREEN

See how this valuation was built

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

See how the value moves with WACC and growth

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor
Research Note

LDG: Recovery underway; DCF/RNAV blend implies meaningful upside but high leverage and earnings volatility raise execution risk

Intrinsic value VND 3,843 vs market VND 2,850 — implied upside 34.8%

Business Overview

Công ty Cổ phần Đầu tư LDG operates in residential and land-development real estate on HOSE under the ICB3 Bất động sản sector. The company has moved from losses in 2023-24 to positive operating scale in 2025 (revenue VND 403.0 bn, net profit VND 92.7 bn) after restructuring, and holds total assets of VND 8,040.3 bn at 2025. Its listed free float and shareholder base are dominated by small individual holders (top five together ~10.2% ownership), and foreign ownership capacity remains meaningfully available (foreign room ~127.06 million shares).

Investment Thesis

LDG's valuation combines a DCF (60%) and RNAV (40%) to arrive at an intrinsic VND 3,843 per share, implying 34.8% upside to the current VND 2,850 market price. The DCF component is supported by a positive base cash flow (base_cf VND 94.8 bn) and a stabilising terminal growth of 3.5%, producing a DCF-derived intrinsic of VND 7,780.4 per share before blending. The RNAV leg (VND 3,187.9 per share, with a revaluation factor of 1.5 and effective factor 0.625) tempers the DCF optimism and anchors value to asset revaluation potential.

Offsetting the upside are structural execution and balance-sheet risks: the company reports a Debt/Equity ratio of 5.17 and net cash/debt presented as net_debt = VND -834.8 bn (net cash on the balance sheet), but interest coverage is modest at 3.21x, and the model flags 'high_risk'. Historical financials show sharp swings — revenue moved from VND -173.2 bn in 2024 to VND 403.0 bn in 2025 and net profit from VND -1,505.8 bn (2024) to VND 92.7 bn (2025) — implying recovery but also earnings volatility. Earnings quality is moderate at 62.5/100, so reported profits should be monitored for one-offs and VAS accounting timing effects common in Vietnamese property firms.

Given the above, the intrinsic upside >25% combined with high model confidence supports a constructive stance. Key caveats: the firm's high leverage ratio and historical earnings swings mean realised returns depend on project execution, timing of cash collections, and land-use-rights monetisation under Vietnamese VAS conventions.

Valuation Commentary

Blend of a leveraged DCF (60%) and RNAV (40%); DCF uses base cash flow growth and a 12% WACC, RNAV uses on-book asset revaluation factors.

  • Base cash flow: VND 94.8 bn (model input base_cf)
  • WACC and capital structure: blended WACC ~10% (model wacc_components wacc 0.10) with D/E = 5.17 and equity cost ke = 11.78%
  • Terminal assumptions: terminal growth 3.5% and TV contribution 67.39% of value
  • Balance-sheet adjustment: net_debt = VND -834.8 bn (net cash)
  • Blend weights: DCF 60% (dcf_intrinsic VND 7,780.4) and RNAV 40% (rnav_intrinsic VND 3,187.9 after revaluation)

The blended intrinsic VND 3,843 implies 34.8% upside to the current price, and the model confidence is 'high'. Confidence reflects a recalibrated model with isotonic calibration and a high-risk flag — we view the upside as meaningful but contingent on execution (project sales, timing of cash inflows). Key sensitivities are WACC, terminal growth, and the company's ability to convert RNAV into realised cash given Vietnamese land-use rights and local market demand.

Bull vs Bear

Bull Case
  • Intrinsic VND 3,843 implies 34.8% upside from VND 2,850 (valuation blend gives room even after conservative RNAV weighting).
  • Net balance-sheet position effectively positive (model net_debt VND -834.8 bn), supporting near-term refinancing and project execution.
  • Recovery in results: revenue up to VND 403.0 bn and net profit turned positive at VND 92.7 bn in 2025 after prior-year losses, indicating operational stabilisation.
  • Reasonable profitability metrics: Gross margin 59.21% and net margin 23.01% indicate project-level profitability when sales crystallise.
Bear Case
  • High reported leverage ratio (Debt/Equity 5.17) and model 'high_risk' flag increase downside if project sale timing slips or market softens.
  • Historic earnings volatility: net loss VND -1,505.8 bn in 2024 vs profit VND 92.7 bn in 2025 — earnings quality only moderate at 62.5/100, raising concern over one-offs and VAS timing differences.
  • Low interest coverage buffer (3.21x) which could tighten under higher rates or slower cash collections.
  • Ownership concentration is relatively dispersed among individuals (top five ~10.2%), potentially limiting strategic long-term governance support; foreign room is large but monetisation is uncertain.

Sector Context

Vietnam real estate remains sensitive to macro credit cycles and SBV credit growth quotas; banks' willingness to finance developers and buyers affects project sales velocity. VAS accounting conventions and timing of recognising revenue from land-use-right transfers can create lumpy earnings for developers; RNAV-based valuations often differ from market prices because land-use-right conversions and revaluation are subject to regulation and local approvals. Comparatively, LDG's implied upside (34.8%) is above the sector median upside of 22.1% among 123 peers, and peers such as NRC, AGG and TDC show higher model upside but with lower model confidence in some cases. Sector-wide issues—policy on mortgage lending, SOE land transfer rules for some projects, and secondary market appetite—are material to execution.

Risk Factors

  • Execution risk: conversion of RNAV to cash depends on selling project inventory and obtaining approvals; any delay compresses value.
  • Leverage and refinancing: Debt/Equity 5.17 and interest coverage 3.21x mean refinancing risk if liquidity tightens or interest costs rise.
  • Earnings volatility and accounting: swings from large losses in 2024 to profits in 2025 highlight exposure to VAS timing, potential one-offs and project revaluations.
  • Market/price risk: 1-year high VND 5,810 and low VND 2,540 show past volatility; downside remains if sentiment reverses.
  • Concentration of shareholder types: top five individuals hold ~10.2%, potentially limiting strategic institutional stewardship; large foreign participation remains possible but not guaranteed.

Catalysts

  • Quarterly results that confirm sustained positive operating cash flow and improved interest coverage.
  • Successful project sales or land monetisation that convert RNAV into bankable cash (reduces execution risk).
  • Announcements of refinancing or deleveraging transactions that materially lower D/E from 5.17.
  • Regulatory easing on mortgage/credit for property buyers or clearer land-use-right approvals that speed project handovers.

Forensic Assessment

No Beneish M-Score data is available (mscore is null) and there are no explicit forensic red flags in the input. Earnings quality is moderate at 62.5/100; given the large swings in reported revenue and net profit across 2023-25, the primary forensic concern is earnings timing and VAS-related recognition rather than clear manipulation indicators. Monitor future cash flow conversion and audit notes for one-off items.

Track Record

The model has 12 years of coverage (2015-2026) with a hit rate of 54.5% — roughly in line with coin-flip performance. Historical average model upside when correct is sizeable (avg_upside_pct 59.9%), but the modest hit rate suggests returns depend heavily on execution and timing; therefore conviction is anchored to observable cash-flow and balance-sheet improvements rather than valuation gaps alone.

Written by a language model on 2026-08-10 from this page’s own model outputs and financial statements, and may quote figures from that date. Descriptive analysis, not investment advice — no buy, sell or hold recommendation is given or implied.

See the statements behind the number

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

See the 2015-present track record

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor

See the earnings-quality breakdown

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

Financial Forensics

Beneish M-Score · 2022

Low Risk
M -1.78 · 67th pctile vs peers
YoY -3.26
Conservative vs VN peersAggressive
Compare across the whole market

Ranked vs Vietnamese peers. The −1.78 Beneish cutoff is US-calibrated; ~28% of VN stocks exceed it.

DSRI
1.977
GMI
1.464
AQI
1.008
SGI
0.601
DEPI
1.004
SGAI
1.872
TATA
0.005
LVGI
0.897

See the Piotroski, Altman and DuPont detail

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

Key Ratios

Fiscal year 2025
7.48P/E
P/B0.53
P/S1.72
ROE7.4%
ROA1.3%
EPS362.76
BVPS5100.71
Gross Margin59.2%
Net Margin23.0%
D/E5.17
Current Ratio1.00
Rev Growth125.6%
Profit Growth109.1%
EV/EBITDA-1.41
Div Yield0.0%

Company Overview

Issued Shares
255.6M
Charter Capital
2556.2B VND
Sector (ICB L2)
Bất động sản
Industry (ICB L3)
Bất động sản
Sub-industry
Bất động sản
Company Type
CT

See who owns this company, and what else they own

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor
Computed 28/08/2026
Methodology & Disclosure

vnvalue is a methodology engine — not an advisor. Every number is the deterministic output of a published formula applied to public financial data. Nothing on this page constitutes investment, financial, legal, or tax advice, nor a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security.

All data, models, and outputs are provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions. Past performance and historical valuations are not indicative of future results.

By using vnvalue you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Full disclaimer →