Back to Dashboard

SID

Real Estate

Công ty Cổ phần Đầu tư Phát triển Sài Gòn Co.op

Bất động sảnCT
11.900
VND · Last close
Valuation Verdict
Undervalued
Low
+30.2%
-120%Fair Value+120%
Current
11.900
Intrinsic Value
15.498
ModelDCF LEVERAGE SCREEN

See how this valuation was built

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

See how the value moves with WACC and growth

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor
Research Note

SID: DCF/RNAV blend implies mid-teens upside from current levels amid material forensic and liquidity concerns

Intrinsic value VND 14,627 vs market VND 11,300; implied upside 29.4% (model confidence: low).

Business Overview

Công ty Cổ phần Đầu tư Phát triển Sài Gòn Co.op (SID) is listed on UPCOM and classified in the Bất động sản (real estate) sector. The company has 100,000,000 issued shares and generates recurring revenue from property-related activities. Recent reported revenue was VND 100.6 bn in 2025 (from VND 99.1 bn in 2024 and VND 87.3 bn in 2023). Total assets stood at VND 2,612.2 bn in 2025, reflecting a large asset base relative to reported earnings.

Investment Thesis

Valuation: Our blended intrinsic value (40% RNAV / 60% DCF) is VND 14,627 per share, implying 29.4% upside to the current price of VND 11,300. The blended approach reflects a material RNAV revaluation factor and a net DCF that is depressed by one-off adjustments in the model. Earnings and returns: Reported profitability is mixed. ROE is 3.09% and ROA 2.89%, while EPS is VND 749 per share and BVPS is VND 24,443. Profitability improved year-on-year with net profit of VND 74.9 bn in 2025 after VND 66.9 bn in 2024, but revenue growth has been muted (Revenue YoY +1.57% in the latest period). Balance sheet and cash: Leverage appears conservatively low by Vietnamese real-estate standards: Debt/Equity is 0.0687. EV/EBITDA is negative, reflecting an EBITDA loss or distortions in reported operating profit (EBIT margin -14.84% despite gross margin 64.70% and net profit margin 74.42%), highlighting unusual P&L composition or one-off items. Governance and liquidity caveats: The investment case is materially weakened by forensic and liquidity issues (see Forensic Assessment). Major shareholder concentration is extreme—Liên Hiệp Hợp Tác Xã Thương Mại Tp. Hồ Chí Minh holds 96.09%—which limits free float and creates governance and minority liquidity risks. Foreign ownership room is 0.0%, further constraining demand from foreign investors.

Valuation Commentary

Blended valuation: 60% DCF (levered) and 40% RNAV with revaluation uplift applied; model calibrated with isotonic mapping and conservative terminal assumptions.

  • Base free cash flow: VND 65,888,230,633 (model input base_cf)
  • WACC 11.52% and terminal growth 3.5%
  • RNAV revaluation factor 1.5 and RNAV effective factor 1.25 producing an RNAV intrinsic of VND 30,554.2 per share
  • Blend weights: 60% DCF intrinsic VND 10,455.1 and 40% RNAV

The blended intrinsic VND 14,627 implies 29.4% upside to the market price, but model confidence is low. Key valuation sensitivity stems from RNAV revaluation assumptions and the low-quality earnings base; upside should be treated cautiously given forensic flags and low liquidity.

Bull vs Bear

Bull Case
  • Blended intrinsic value VND 14,627 per share implies 29.4% upside from the current price of VND 11,300.
  • Strong balance-sheet metrics: Debt/Equity only 0.0687 and a high Altman Z-Score (6.13, noted in forensic positives) indicate low bankruptcy risk.
  • RNAV pathway generates VND 30,554.2 per share before blending, providing substantial optionality if asset revaluation realizes.
Bear Case
  • Forensic red flags: Beneish M-Score 3.1454 (high) and earnings quality score 18.7/100 point to aggressive accounting and poor cash conversion.
  • Severely limited free float and liquidity—major shareholder owns 96.09% and foreign room is 0.0%—which can amplify downside on any governance or news shock; 2-week avg volume only 3,099 shares.
  • Profitability disconnects: EBIT margin -14.84% versus net profit margin 74.42% and negative EV/EBITDA (-218.76) suggest one-off items or accounting distortions that could reverse.

Sector Context

The Vietnamese real-estate sector remains exposed to regulatory cycles, State Bank credit guidance to banks, and SOE-related payout mandates for state-linked owners. Real-estate valuations often hinge on land-use-right revaluations and RNAV adjustments; the model here applies an RNAV revaluation factor (1.5) and an RNAV effective factor (1.25) to reflect potential revaluation upside. Peers show a median implied upside of 22.1% in our sample of 123 names; SID's 29.4% is above the sector median but comes with lower model confidence and higher forensic risk. UPCOM-listed real-estate names typically suffer from lower liquidity and limited foreign participation—both present for SID (foreign_room 0.0%).

Risk Factors

  • Forensic/accounting risk: Beneish M-Score 3.1454 (high); year-over-year M-Score change +5.72 indicates potential earnings manipulation.
  • Low earnings quality: Earnings Quality Score 18.7/100 with cash conversion and receivables metrics reported at 0.0/100.
  • Liquidity and float risk: Top shareholder controls 96.09% and average 2-week volume is only 3,099 shares; foreign_room is 0.0%.
  • Profitability volatility: Discrepancy between negative EBIT margin (-14.84%) and very high net profit margin (74.42%) suggests one-off items or classification issues.
  • Model confidence: Valuation confidence flagged as low and model sanity flags include 'illiquid', 'low_earnings_quality', and 'manipulation_risk'.
  • Regulatory/market: Real-estate valuations in Vietnam depend on land-use-rights treatment under VAS and local revaluation rules; any regulatory tightening or delays to revaluation approvals could depress RNAV.

Catalysts

  • RNAV realization events (asset revaluations, land-use-right monetization or disposals) that support the RNAV uplift in the model.
  • Improvement in earnings quality and cash conversion—regularized cash flows would materially raise confidence in the DCF component.
  • Any increase in free float (share disposal by the controlling shareholder) that improves liquidity and attracts broader investor interest.

Forensic Assessment

The forensic assessment is the primary concern. Beneish M-Score is 3.1454 (well above the manipulation threshold), placing SID in the 98th percentile among peers, and the M-Score has worsened year-on-year by +5.72. Earnings Quality Score is very low at 18.7/100 with cash conversion and receivables metrics reported as 0.0/100. While the Altman Z-Score of 6.13 suggests low bankruptcy risk and Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 is neutral, the combination of aggressive accounting signals, low earnings quality and near-zero public float creates a meaningful governance and transparency risk for investors.

Track Record

Model track record across 10 years shows a hit rate of 66.7% with an average upside of 18.9% for past calls; this is above coinflip but not perfect. Given the current case's low model confidence and strong forensic red flags, historical hit-rate is informative but should not be relied upon to override present accounting concerns.

Written by a language model on 2026-08-10 from this page’s own model outputs and financial statements, and may quote figures from that date. Descriptive analysis, not investment advice — no buy, sell or hold recommendation is given or implied.

See the statements behind the number

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

See the 2015-present track record

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor

See the earnings-quality breakdown

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

Financial Forensics

Beneish M-Score · 2025

High Risk
M 3.15 · 98th pctile vs peers
YoY ▲ +5.72
Conservative vs VN peersAggressive
Compare across the whole market

Ranked vs Vietnamese peers. The −1.78 Beneish cutoff is US-calibrated; ~28% of VN stocks exceed it.

DSRI
6.550
GMI
0.966
AQI
1.032
SGI
1.016
DEPI
0.844
SGAI
1.048
TATA
0.121
LVGI
1.089

Read the forensic analysis

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor

See the Piotroski, Altman and DuPont detail

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

Key Ratios

Fiscal year 2025
16.12P/E
P/B0.49
P/S11.83
ROE3.1%
ROA2.9%
EPS748.70
BVPS24443.33
Gross Margin64.7%
Net Margin74.4%
D/E0.07
Current Ratio10.19
Rev Growth1.6%
Profit Growth71.1%
EV/EBITDA-231.39
Div Yield0.0%

Company Overview

Issued Shares
100.0M
Charter Capital
1000.0B VND
Sector (ICB L2)
Bất động sản
Industry (ICB L3)
Bất động sản
Sub-industry
Bất động sản
Company Type
CT

See who owns this company, and what else they own

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor
Computed 28/08/2026
Methodology & Disclosure

vnvalue is a methodology engine — not an advisor. Every number is the deterministic output of a published formula applied to public financial data. Nothing on this page constitutes investment, financial, legal, or tax advice, nor a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security.

All data, models, and outputs are provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions. Past performance and historical valuations are not indicative of future results.

By using vnvalue you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Full disclaimer →