Back to Dashboard

SSH

Real Estate

Công ty Cổ phần Phát triển Sunshine Homes

Bất động sảnCT
61.000
VND · Last close
Valuation Verdict
Undervalued
Very Low
+11.5%
-120%Fair Value+120%
Current
61.000
Intrinsic Value
68.022
ModelDCF LEVERAGE SCREEN

See how this valuation was built

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

See how the value moves with WACC and growth

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor
Research Note

SSH: High leverage and forensic red flags limit upside despite NAV/DCFintrinsic blend

Intrinsic value VND 68,803 vs market VND 61,700 — implied upside 11.5% (confidence: very_low).

Business Overview

Công ty Cổ phần Phát triển Sunshine Homes (SSH) is a UPCoM-listed real estate developer within the Sunshine Group ecosystem, focused on residential projects and property development in Vietnam. The company reported a sharp revenue decline in 2025 to VND 597.1 bn from VND 2,933.9 bn in 2024 and VND 2,901.2 bn in 2023, reflecting project timing and sales recognition volatility common for developers that monetize through milestone-based VAS accounting.

SSH's balance sheet is large but highly leveraged: total assets fell to VND 12,139.2 bn in 2025 from VND 14,394.9 bn in 2024, while model net debt is VND 3,430.6 bn. Ownership is extremely concentrated: Sunshine Group (Công ty Cổ phần Tập đoàn Sunshine) holds 99.96% of shares, leaving limited free float and little foreign room (foreign_room: VND 187,499,898.75). For developers, value drivers include land bank revaluation, presales execution and recognition timing, and the ability to convert land use rights to saleable inventory under local regulations and VAS treatments.

Investment Thesis

SSH's blended intrinsic value of VND 68,803 per share combines a DCF (weighted 60%) and an RNAV-derived value (40%), producing an implied upside of 11.5% to the current market price of VND 61,700. The model uses a high WACC (~12%) and terminal growth of 3.5%, with a notable one-off strip ratio and heavy reliance on short-term cash flow recovery (base_cf VND 1,086,287,144,517). This valuation reflects material execution risk: revenue collapsed by 79.6% YoY in 2025 and net profit swung to a loss of VND -399.3 bn in 2025 from positive profits in prior years (VND 1,161.2 bn in 2023, VND 804.4 bn in 2024).

Operationally, the company shows mixed margin signals — gross margin remains high at 45.7% but net profit margin is deeply negative at -68.97% and ROE is -6.96%, indicative of interest or one-off charges and poor bottom-line conversion. Leverage (Debt/Equity ~0.99) and model net debt VND 3,430.6 bn constrain flexibility; the DCF portion yields a low standalone DCF intrinsic of VND 33,349 per share, while RNAV contributed VND 18,449.8 per share before upweighting. Given the very_low model confidence and forensic red flags (Beneish M-Score 0.3451, earnings quality 14.8/100), the modest 11.5% upside does not sufficiently compensate for execution, accounting and liquidity risks.

Valuation Commentary

Blend of a leveraged DCF (60%) and an RNAV revaluation (40%) calibrated via isotonic mapping; DCF uses base cash flow and growth driven by a ROIC-based fundamental blend.

  • Base operating cash flow: VND 1,086,287,144,517 (model input).
  • WACC ~12% with debt/equity mix ~0.99 (de = 0.99; debt weight 54.71%; ke ~11.97%).
  • Terminal growth rate: 3.5%; TV contributed ~68.97% of value (tv_pct 0.6897).
  • Net debt: VND 3,430.6 bn deducted from enterprise value.
  • Blend weights: DCF 60% (DCF_intrinsic VND 33,349.1), RNAV 40% (RNAV_intrinsic VND 18,449.8 with revaluation factor 1.5).

The VND 68,803/share intrinsic is the model's calibrated outcome but carries very_low confidence due to illiquidity, low earnings quality and manipulation risk flags. The modest 11.5% upside implies limited margin of safety versus the current price; model sensitivity to WACC, cash-flow recovery and revaluation assumptions is high, so valuation should be treated as directional rather than definitive.

Bull vs Bear

Bull Case
  • Blended intrinsic value VND 68,803 is above market price VND 61,700 implying 11.5% upside if cash flows normalize and RNAV revaluation materializes.
  • High gross margin of 45.7% suggests project-level profitability if SG&A and financing costs stabilize.
  • RNAV inputs and revaluation factors (rnav_revaluation_factor 1.5; rnav_effective_factor 1.25) leave scope for upside if land use rights are sold or revalued at market prices.
Bear Case
  • Forensic red flags: Beneish M-Score 0.3451 (94th percentile) and earnings quality 14.8/100 suggest aggressive accounting and poor cash conversion.
  • Sharp operational deterioration: revenue down to VND 597.1 bn in 2025 (–79.6% YoY) and net loss VND -399.3 bn in 2025, implying volatile recognition and weak near-term earnings.
  • High leverage: model net debt VND 3,430.6 bn and Debt/Equity ~0.99 constrain liquidity and increase refinancing risk in a tight credit environment.
  • Extremely concentrated ownership (Sunshine Group 99.96%) and near-zero free float limit market liquidity (avg_volume_2w ~1.0) and reduce minority shareholder protections.

Sector Context

The Vietnamese real estate sector remains sensitive to SBV credit cycles and developer-specific lending quotas, which directly affect presales and project execution. VAS accounting allows milestone recognition that can create lumpy revenue profiles — SSH's 2025 revenue collapse is an example of timing and recognition risk rather than pure demand shock. Developers often hold substantial land use rights on the balance sheet; successful monetization or revaluation of those rights is a common value unlock but also a source of valuation uncertainty and potential related-party transactions.

Peer context: sector median model upside is 22.1% (123 peers). Several peers show higher implied upside with comparable risk profiles (e.g., NRC +55.5%, AGG +41.3%), while some large names show negative implied upside with very_low confidence. Regulatory considerations include SOE payout mandates for state-linked players and VAMC usage for bank exposures; for developers, exposure to bank funding and developer-linked VAMC/NPL transfers can materially affect covenant risk and refinancing costs.

Risk Factors

  • Accounting/manipulation risk: Beneish M-Score 0.3451 (elevated) and a year-over-year M-Score increase of +1.61 point to potential aggressive recognition.
  • Very poor earnings quality: score 14.8/100 with 0/100 in cash conversion and receivables — reported profits may not translate into cash.
  • Liquidity and marketability: average volume two-week ~1.0 and concentrated ownership (99.96% held by Sunshine Group) increase trading illiquidity and minority exit risk.
  • Refinancing and interest risk: net debt VND 3,430.6 bn and interest coverage implied as weak (interest_coverage 0.15 in inputs) raise the risk of covenant breaches under tighter credit.
  • Execution and sales risk: revenue fell to VND 597.1 bn in 2025 from VND 2,933.9 bn in 2024, highlighting delivery and presale timing risk.
  • Valuation sensitivity: DCF intrinsic is VND 33,349.1 per share — a large gap to blended value indicates reliance on RNAV/revaluation assumptions that may not realize.

Catalysts

  • Evidence of cash-flow recovery or improved cash conversion metrics (operating cash flow improvement).
  • Transparent independent revaluation or sale of land use rights that narrows RNAV uncertainty.
  • Resolution or disclosure addressing forensic red flags (audit adjustments or stronger cash disclosures).
  • Changes in group-level strategy by Sunshine Group that increase free-float or clarify related-party transactions.

Forensic Assessment

Forensic indicators are the primary concern. Beneish M-Score of 0.3451 (in the 94th percentile vs peers) flags a heightened probability of aggressive accounting; the M-Score increased by +1.61 YoY, suggesting a deterioration trend. Earnings quality at 14.8/100—particularly 0/100 for cash conversion and receivables—supports the view that reported earnings have low cash backing. Positive signals include an Altman Z-Score of 3.57 (distance from bankruptcy), but the low Piotroski F-Score (3/9) indicates weak fundamental health. Overall, treat reported profits and booked RNAV with skepticism until cash realization and disclosure improve.

Track Record

Model track record: 6 years with a hit rate of 60%, but average realized change after calls is negative (avg_upside_pct -57.8%), indicating volatile outcomes and adverse tail risks in prior recommendations. Use prior performance cautiously — the model can be directionally useful (60% hit rate) but has produced large misses on average, so position sizing and conviction should be conservative.

Written by a language model on 2026-08-11 from this page’s own model outputs and financial statements, and may quote figures from that date. Descriptive analysis, not investment advice — no buy, sell or hold recommendation is given or implied.

See the statements behind the number

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

See the 2015-present track record

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor

See the earnings-quality breakdown

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

Financial Forensics

Beneish M-Score · 2025

Elevated
M 0.35 · 94th pctile vs peers
YoY ▲ +1.61
Conservative vs VN peersAggressive
Compare across the whole market

Ranked vs Vietnamese peers. The −1.78 Beneish cutoff is US-calibrated; ~28% of VN stocks exceed it.

DSRI
4.592
GMI
1.014
AQI
0.839
SGI
0.204
DEPI
1.870
SGAI
2.766
TATA
0.103
LVGI
0.962

Read the forensic analysis

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor

See the Piotroski, Altman and DuPont detail

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

Key Ratios

Fiscal year 2025
-57.29P/E
P/B4.13
P/S38.31
ROE-7.0%
ROA-3.0%
EPS-1064.76
BVPS14759.82
Gross Margin45.7%
Net Margin-69.0%
D/E0.99
Current Ratio2.13
Rev Growth-79.6%
Profit Growth-151.1%
EV/EBITDA228.39
Div Yield1.1%

Company Overview

Issued Shares
375.0M
Charter Capital
3750.0B VND
Sector (ICB L2)
Bất động sản
Industry (ICB L3)
Bất động sản
Sub-industry
Bất động sản
Company Type
CT

See who owns this company, and what else they own

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor
Computed 28/08/2026
Methodology & Disclosure

vnvalue is a methodology engine — not an advisor. Every number is the deterministic output of a published formula applied to public financial data. Nothing on this page constitutes investment, financial, legal, or tax advice, nor a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security.

All data, models, and outputs are provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions. Past performance and historical valuations are not indicative of future results.

By using vnvalue you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Full disclaimer →