Back to Dashboard

TCK

Construction

Tổng Công ty Cơ khí Xây dựng - CTCP

Xây dựng và Vật liệuCT
3.000
VND · Last close
Valuation Verdict
Undervalued
Low
+22.2%
-120%Fair Value+120%
Current
3.000
Intrinsic Value
3.666
ModelEV EBITDA MIDCYCLE

See how this valuation was built

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

See how the value moves with WACC and growth

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor
Research Note

TCK: State-owned construction machine-maker; mid-cycle EV/EBITDA implies limited room for error

Intrinsic value VND 3,666 vs market VND 3,000 — implied upside 22.2% (model confidence: low).

Business Overview

Tổng Công ty Cơ khí Xây dựng - CTCP (TCK) is a state-controlled construction equipment and mechanical engineering group listed on UPCOM. The company operates in construction and building materials (ICB: Xây dựng và Vật liệu) with manufacturing and project services exposure. Revenues recovered to VND 330.0 bn in 2025 from VND 285.8 bn in 2024 and VND 294.9 bn in 2023, indicating renewed activity in its core segments. The shareholder base is overwhelmingly state-controlled: Bộ Xây Dựng owns 98.7639%, which shapes strategic objectives, dividend/payout expectations and limits free-float dynamics.

Investment Thesis

The intrinsic valuation uses a mid-cycle EV/EBITDA framework and yields an implied value of VND 3,666 per share versus the market match price of VND 3,000 (22.2% upside). Key supportive elements are (i) a conservative fair EV/EBITDA multiple of 10.35 (own_history) applied to a mid-cycle EBITDA of VND 21,767,514,510 and (ii) historically low market pricing (current EV/EBITDA 5.02) that already discounts execution risk. Revenue momentum turned positive with 2025 revenue of VND 330.0 bn (2025 vs 2024: up), and net profit returned to positive VND 12.9 bn in 2025 after a loss of VND 14.0 bn in 2023.

Countervailing risks narrow the investment case: (i) the model confidence is explicitly low after isotonic calibration (confidence: low) and the report flags sanity issues including illiquidity, mediocre earnings quality and negative equity; (ii) ROE is deeply negative at -35.7% while BVPS is negative at VND -1,308 per share, signalling balance-sheet strain and limited capital buffer; (iii) the ownership structure — Bộ Xây Dựng at 98.76% — constrains free-float and limits catalysts from active private ownership or foreign inflows despite available foreign room of 11,686,500 shares. Given the 22.2% implied upside but low model confidence and execution/forensic flags, the upside does not sufficiently compensate for the balance-sheet and liquidity risks at current prices.

Valuation Commentary

Mid-cycle EV/EBITDA: apply a fair EV/EBITDA multiple to a multi-year median (mid-cycle) EBITDA, subtract net debt and divide by shares to derive per-share intrinsic value.

  • Mid-cycle EBITDA (own_median) = VND 21,767,514,510 (model input).
  • Fair EV/EBITDA applied = 10.35 (source: own_history).
  • Net debt = VND 117,019,806,528 (model input) reduces enterprise value to equity value.
  • Calibration reduced raw intrinsic VND 4,542.7 to VND 3,666 via isotonic method to address model fit and sanity flags.

The implied upside of 22.2% reflects a substantial re-rating from current EV/EBITDA (5.02) toward a mid-cycle multiple. Confidence is low — the calibration reduced a raw intrinsic of VND 4,542.7 to VND 3,666 and model inputs carry earnings-quality and liquidity flags. Treat the intrinsic as indicative rather than high-conviction; downside is meaningful if EBITDA underperforms or if balance-sheet weaknesses persist.

Bull vs Bear

Bull Case
  • Valuation gap: Current EV/EBITDA 5.02 vs fair EV/EBITDA 10.35 implies potential re-rating to support the VND 3,666 intrinsic.
  • Revenue rebound: 2025 revenue of VND 330.0 bn above 2024 VND 285.8 bn suggests demand recovery in core construction segments.
  • Turnaround in profitability: Net profit returned to positive VND 12.9 bn in 2025 after a VND -14.0 bn loss in 2023, demonstrating recovery potential.
Bear Case
  • Negative equity and weak ROE: BVPS is VND -1,308 and ROE is -35.7%, indicating balance-sheet depletion and limited capital buffer.
  • Earnings quality and liquidity flags: Earnings_quality at 47.9 (mediocre) and model sanity flags include 'illiquid' — average 2-week volume is zero, raising execution and exit risk.
  • Concentrated state ownership: Bộ Xây Dựng holds 98.7639%, constraining operational flexibility, corporate governance dynamics and limiting potential private/foreign support despite foreign room of 11,686,500 shares.

Sector Context

The construction and building-materials sector in Vietnam is cyclical and sensitive to public infrastructure spending and property market trends. Lending and project activity can be constrained by SBV credit growth quotas and SOE directives; for state-controlled groups like TCK, mandate-driven contracts and state capital decisions often determine throughput more than pure commercial dynamics. VAS accounting and occasional recognition timing differences can affect comparability across peers — for example, differences in capitalization of construction contracts, provisions and treatment of land-use-right related assets. Peer universe shows mixed valuation outcomes: sector median implied upside is 9.6% while several peers exhibit higher upside but also low confidence, underscoring sector-wide execution uncertainty.

Risk Factors

  • Balance-sheet risk: BVPS negative at VND -1,308 and ROE -35.7% increase the chance of equity dilution or state recapitalization.
  • Liquidity risk: avg_volume_2w = 0.0 and UPCOM listing reduce marketability and heighten price impact for larger flows.
  • Earnings-quality risk: earnings_quality = 47.9 and model sanity flag 'mediocre_earnings_quality' point to volatile reported profit and potential recognition issues.
  • Concentration risk: Bộ Xây Dựng owns 98.7639%, limiting corporate governance improvements and independent strategic moves.
  • Operational/sector cyclicality: construction revenues are sensitive to public capex cycles and property market health; a slowdown would hit revenue and mid-cycle EBITDA assumptions.
  • Model risk: intrinsic valuation was calibrated down from a raw VND 4,542.7 to VND 3,666 and model confidence is low — the valuation is sensitive to EBITDA and multiple assumptions.
  • Foreign participation constraints: although foreign_room = 11,686,500 shares exists, concentrated state ownership and UPCOM listing may deter material foreign inflows.

Catalysts

  • Improvement in EBITDA generation or a sustained revenue trajectory above VND 330.0 bn would support re-rating toward mid-cycle multiples.
  • Government-directed recapitalization or asset transfers from Bộ Xây Dựng that improve equity position or reduce net debt.
  • Listing/market-structure changes that increase liquidity or move shares to a more liquid exchange segment.
  • Large contract awards tied to public infrastructure that materially lift forward revenue visibility.

Forensic Assessment

No Beneish M-Score is available (mscore = null), so there is no explicit M-Score manipulation signal. However, the report's sanity flags note 'mediocre_earnings_quality' and 'negative_equity', and earnings_quality is 47.9 — these are the primary forensic concerns. Illiquidity and concentrated state ownership reduce external market scrutiny. In sum: no formal M-Score alert, but earnings quality and balance-sheet deterioration warrant careful monitoring of accounting policies and unusual one-off items.

Track Record

Model track record covers 6 years with a hit rate of 80% (years where the model's directional >10% call matched next-year price direction). However, average realized upside over the period is -23.3%, indicating that while directional calls were often right, magnitude forecasting has been poor. Use prior performance as a directional signal only; magnitude and calibration have required adjustments (the current model applied isotonic calibration).

Written by a language model on 2026-08-11 from this page’s own model outputs and financial statements, and may quote figures from that date. Descriptive analysis, not investment advice — no buy, sell or hold recommendation is given or implied.

See the statements behind the number

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

See the 2015-present track record

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor

See the earnings-quality breakdown

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

Financial Forensics

Beneish M-Score · 2025

Low Risk
M -2.63 · 32th pctile vs peers
YoY ▲ +0.10
Conservative vs VN peersAggressive
Compare across the whole market

Ranked vs Vietnamese peers. The −1.78 Beneish cutoff is US-calibrated; ~28% of VN stocks exceed it.

DSRI
0.870
GMI
1.160
AQI
0.625
SGI
1.155
DEPI
0.688
SGAI
1.789
TATA
0.013
LVGI
0.986

See the Piotroski, Altman and DuPont detail

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

Key Ratios

Fiscal year 2025
5.55P/E
P/B0.00
P/S0.22
ROE-35.7%
ROA1.5%
EPS540.25
BVPS-1307.53
Gross Margin19.3%
Net Margin4.4%
D/E-33.70
Current Ratio0.74
Rev Growth16.5%
Profit Growth-83.5%
EV/EBITDA5.02
Div Yield0.0%

Company Overview

Issued Shares
23.9M
Charter Capital
238.5B VND
Sector (ICB L2)
Xây dựng và Vật liệu
Industry (ICB L3)
Xây dựng và Vật liệu
Sub-industry
Xây dựng
Company Type
CT

See who owns this company, and what else they own

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor
Computed 28/08/2026
Methodology & Disclosure

vnvalue is a methodology engine — not an advisor. Every number is the deterministic output of a published formula applied to public financial data. Nothing on this page constitutes investment, financial, legal, or tax advice, nor a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security.

All data, models, and outputs are provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions. Past performance and historical valuations are not indicative of future results.

By using vnvalue you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Full disclaimer →