Back to Dashboard

TDW

Utilities

Công ty Cổ phần Cấp nước Thủ Đức

Điện, nước & xăng dầu khí đốtNước & Khí đốtCT
47.500
VND · Last close
Valuation Verdict
Undervalued
Low
+16.6%
-120%Fair Value+120%
Current
47.500
Intrinsic Value
55.364
ModelDDM 3STAGE

See how this valuation was built

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

See how the value moves with WACC and growth

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor
Research Note

Cấp nước Thủ Đức (TDW): regulated cash generator with concentrated ownership and limited liquidity

Intrinsic value VND 57,158 vs market VND 45,100, implying +26.7% upside (model confidence: low).

Business Overview

Công ty Cổ phần Cấp nước Thủ Đức (TDW) is a regional water utility listed on HOSE operating in the Nước & Khí đốt ICB subsector. The company sells treated water under long-standing municipal contracts and benefits from regulated pricing and stable volumetric demand typical for urban utilities. Revenues have shown low single-digit growth, from VND 1,282.6 bn in 2023 to VND 1,342.8 bn in 2025, while net profit rose to VND 60.4 bn in 2025. The firm is capital intensive: total assets expanded from VND 466.4 bn in 2023 to VND 716.1 bn in 2025, reflecting network investment and asset additions.

Investment Thesis

TDW combines predictable cash flows and a high payout culture with visible near-term distributable earnings. The company reported EPS of VND 7,110 and a dividend per share of VND 5,034 (events), producing a dividend yield of 5.8% and a payout ratio of 76.3% in the valuation model — characteristics attractive to income-oriented investors in utilities. Profitability metrics are respectable for the sector: ROE is 23.9% and gross margin 35.2%, while EV/EBITDA at 2.71x points to low enterprise value relative to operating cash.

Valuation Commentary

Three-stage dividend-discount model that projects DPS forward using a fundamental-equity blend for growth, then discounts at a cost of equity to estimate intrinsic value.

  • DPS (events) = VND 5,034 per share used as the base cash return.
  • Base growth = 5.6% derived from a fundamental blend (ROE 23.63% and retention ratio 23.7%).
  • Cost of equity = 10.7% (rf 4.36% + ERP 4.38% + CRP 2.75%, beta 0.82).
  • Terminal growth = 3.5% and terminal value represents 67.31% of the valuation.
  • Model calibration reduced the raw intrinsic value VND 77,809.9 to VND 57,158 with isotonic recalibration; model flagged 'illiquid' and confidence is low.

The model produces intrinsic VND 57,158, implying +26.7% upside versus the market price. Confidence is low due to illiquidity and calibration adjustments; therefore the intrinsic figure should be treated as directional rather than precise. Upside is modestly attractive but execution/marketability risk (very low trading volumes) limit conviction.

Bull vs Bear

Bull Case
  • High DPS: VND 5,034 per share provides a 5.8% cash yield and supports total return even if price appreciation is muted.
  • Attractive returns on equity: ROE of 23.9% suggests efficient use of equity capital versus many regulated peers.
  • Low EV/EBITDA of 2.71x and P/E of 9.35x indicate valuation is below many listed utilities, offering upside if liquidity improves.
Bear Case
  • Severe liquidity constraints: average volume over 2 weeks is only 140 shares and model flagged 'illiquid', making entry/exit high friction.
  • Extremely concentrated ownership: Tổng Công ty Cấp nước Sài Gòn (51.0%) and Công ty TNHH Nước Sạch Ree (44.17%) together hold >95% of shares, limiting free float and the likelihood of active market-driven rerating.
  • Low model confidence and calibration: the DDM was isotonic-calibrated from a raw intrinsic VND 77,809.9 down to VND 57,158, indicating sensitivity to input assumptions and signalling uncertainty.
  • Rising leverage profile: Debt/Equity is 1.73 which is relatively elevated for a utility with regulated cash flows, increasing balance-sheet risk if capex or working capital needs rise.

Sector Context

The water & gas subsector is characterized by regulated tariffs, municipal counterparties, and high capital intensity; Vietnam-specific considerations include VAS accounting treatment of revalued assets and local shareholders' influence. Peers in the sector show a median model upside of 16.6%, placing TDW's implied +26.7% above the sector median but with lower model confidence. Regulatory factors such as local authorities' tariff approvals, SBV credit growth quotas for financing infrastructure, and state-owned enterprise (SOE) dividend/payout expectations are relevant. TDW's majority stake by state-owned and large private water companies means corporate actions, dividends and tariff negotiations are likely governed by those controlling shareholders rather than minority-market dynamics.

Risk Factors

  • Liquidity risk — Avg volume 2w = 140 shares and the model flagged 'illiquid', making large trades disruptive and widening execution risk.
  • Ownership concentration — Two institutions hold 51.0% and 44.17%, leaving minimal free float and increasing minority shareholder passivity.
  • Model confidence — Valuation confidence is low after isotonic recalibration from a raw intrinsic VND 77,809.9 to VND 57,158; inputs (growth, payout) drive outcomes sensitively.
  • Balance-sheet/leverage — Debt/Equity = 1.73 could pressure cash flow if capex or regulatory lag increases; interest cost shocks would erode net margin (current net margin 4.5%).
  • Regulatory/tariff risk — Tariff adjustments depend on municipal approvals; slower-than-expected tariff revisions would compress earnings relative to model assumptions.
  • Marketability/foreign participation — Foreign room exists (4,170,479.015) but concentrated domestic ownership and low daily turnover limit foreign investor access, reducing likelihood of rerating.
  • Earnings quality caveats — Earnings quality score 67.4 is moderate; while not alarming, it warrants monitoring of non-cash items and one-off adjustments in VAS financials.

Catalysts

  • Announcement of a sustained dividend policy or special dividend above the recent DPS could catalyse revaluation given the high payout ratio implied by the model.
  • Improvement in trading liquidity or a placement that increases free float would materially reduce the 'illiquid' discount.
  • Favourable municipal tariff approval increasing revenue growth above the model's 5.6% base would lift intrinsic value materially.
  • Debt refinancing at lower cost or asset sales that reduce Debt/Equity would de-risk the balance sheet and could support multiple expansion.

Forensic Assessment

No Beneish M-Score is available and there are no forensic red flags in the input; forensic summary fields are null. Earnings quality is moderate at 67.4/100, so while there are no explicit manipulation warnings, analysts should monitor VAS-specific accounting items (revaluations, asset transfers) and non-recurring items in cash flow reporting.

Track Record

This model's historical track record across 12 years shows a hit rate of 27.3% and an average realized upside of -14.7%, indicating limited predictive reliability historically. Users should therefore treat the current intrinsic estimate as one input among many rather than a high-confidence target.

Written by a language model on 2026-08-10 from this page’s own model outputs and financial statements, and may quote figures from that date. Descriptive analysis, not investment advice — no buy, sell or hold recommendation is given or implied.

See the statements behind the number

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

See the 2015-present track record

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor

See the earnings-quality breakdown

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

Financial Forensics

Beneish M-Score · 2025

Low Risk
M -3.15 · 11th pctile vs peers
YoY -0.47
Conservative vs VN peersAggressive
Compare across the whole market

Ranked vs Vietnamese peers. The −1.78 Beneish cutoff is US-calibrated; ~28% of VN stocks exceed it.

DSRI
1.135
GMI
0.995
AQI
0.506
SGI
1.019
DEPI
1.123
SGAI
0.979
TATA
-0.127
LVGI
1.111

See the Piotroski, Altman and DuPont detail

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

Key Ratios

Fiscal year 2025
9.85P/E
P/B1.54
P/S0.30
ROE23.9%
ROA9.4%
EPS7110.10
BVPS30880.64
Gross Margin35.1%
Net Margin4.5%
D/E1.73
Current Ratio0.52
Rev Growth1.9%
Profit Growth7.7%
EV/EBITDA2.84
Div Yield5.5%

Company Overview

Issued Shares
8.5M
Charter Capital
85.0B VND
Sector (ICB L2)
Điện, nước & xăng dầu khí đốt
Industry (ICB L3)
Nước & Khí đốt
Sub-industry
Nước
Company Type
CT

See who owns this company, and what else they own

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor
Computed 28/08/2026
Methodology & Disclosure

vnvalue is a methodology engine — not an advisor. Every number is the deterministic output of a published formula applied to public financial data. Nothing on this page constitutes investment, financial, legal, or tax advice, nor a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security.

All data, models, and outputs are provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions. Past performance and historical valuations are not indicative of future results.

By using vnvalue you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Full disclaimer →