Back to Dashboard

UNI

Technology

Công ty Cổ phần Đầu tư và Phát triển Sao Mai Việt

Công nghệ Thông tinPhần mềm & Dịch vụ Máy tínhCT
6.400
VND · Last close
Valuation Verdict
Undervalued
Low
+6.0%
-120%Fair Value+120%
Current
6.400
Intrinsic Value
6.787
ModelDCF PE BLEND

See how this valuation was built

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

See how the value moves with WACC and growth

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor
Research Note

UNI: distressed software name; small positive valuation cushion but high forensic and execution risk

Intrinsic value VND 7,211 vs market VND 6,800 — implied upside 6.0% (model confidence: low).

Business Overview

Công ty Cổ phần Đầu tư và Phát triển Sao Mai Việt (UNI) is listed on HNX in the Phần mềm & Dịch vụ Máy tính segment. The company reported revenues of VND 4.5 bn in 2025 after VND 1.1 bn in 2024 and VND 1.7 bn in 2023, indicating a recovery in top line but from a very small base. Total assets expanded to VND 902.8 bn in 2025 from VND 556.5 bn in 2024 and VND 497.0 bn in 2023, suggesting either balance-sheet growth through non-operating items or asset reclassifications rather than scaled operating expansion given the modest revenue base.

Ownership is concentrated: five largest shareholders together hold ~86.4% (largest: Công ty TNHH Đầu Tư Phát Triển Tổng Hợp Nhân Nghĩa 21.82%, two individuals 21.52% and 19.63%). Foreign room is closed (0.0%), constraining liquidity from offshore investors. Trading is illiquid (avg volume 2w: 3,034 shares) and 1y range is VND 6,000–11,700 with match price VND 6,800 as of 2026-08-10.

Investment Thesis

UNI's implied intrinsic value of VND 7,211 per share is only modestly above the market price of VND 6,800 (6.0% upside) but the model's confidence is low and the DCF leg produced a negative intrinsic (model_inputs.dcf_intrinsic = -1,558.5), triggering a distressed calibration. The calibration yields a raw intrinsic of VND 5,086.7 before isotonic recalibration to VND 7,211; this process and the model's 'distressed' flag indicate weak faith in steady-state cash flows.

Fundamentals are mixed-to-weak: gross margin is high at 47.8% and EBIT margin is 13.0%, yet net profit margin is negative at -0.2% and EPS is -0.2345, implying operating profitability does not flow through to the bottom line. Leverage is material (Debt/Equity 1.08) while valuation multiples are either distorted or meaningless given losses (P/E -28,995.6, EV/EBITDA 616.6). BVPS is VND 10,173 which provides a tangible balance-sheet floor relative to the market price, but that relief is offset by forensic and earnings-quality concerns.

Given the narrow upside (6.0%) and the company's high forensic risk (Beneish M-Score 0.8494, Altman Z-Score 1.52), the potential reward does not adequately compensate for the risk of accounting manipulation, financial distress and illiquidity. The combination of concentrated insider ownership, closed foreign room, and low two-week average volume increases the execution risk for any active position.

Valuation Commentary

Blend of a DCF and P/E model (weights: DCF 60% / P/E 40%) with isotonic recalibration and a distress adjustment because the DCF leg produced a negative intrinsic.

  • DCF component returned a negative intrinsic (model_inputs.dcf_intrinsic = -1,558.5), triggering distressed calibration.
  • Blend result after isotonic calibration produced intrinsic value VND 7,211 per share (raw_intrinsic_value before calibration VND 5,086.7).
  • WACC used = 10.0% and terminal growth = 4.5%; BVPS floor applied at VND 10,173.4 supports downside protection.
  • Model confidence flagged as low (confidence: low) with sanity flags: illiquid, mediocre_earnings_quality, manipulation_risk.

The VND 7,211 intrinsic implies only 6.0% upside versus the market price, and model confidence is low due to a negative DCF result and forensic flags. The BVPS floor (VND 10,173) is higher than the intrinsic but reflects balance-sheet concentration rather than earnings power; treat the calibrated intrinsic as fragile rather than robust.

Bull vs Bear

Bull Case
  • Calibrated intrinsic value VND 7,211 is above market VND 6,800, leaving a small cushion of 6.0% for shareholders.
  • High gross margin (47.8%) and positive EBIT margin (13.0%) indicate underlying product-level profitability if operating scale or cost recognition improves.
  • BVPS at VND 10,173 provides a tangible accounting floor that exceeds the market price, which could limit downside if assets are realizable.
Bear Case
  • High Beneish M-Score 0.8494 and Altman Z-Score 1.52 point to aggressive accounting and financial distress; M-Score rose by +2.89 year-over-year per the forensic summary.
  • Negative net margin (-0.2%) and EPS of -0.2345 show that operating profits have not converted to net earnings; P/E is effectively meaningless (P/E -28,995.6).
  • Illiquidity (avg volume 2w = 3,034) and closed foreign room (0.0%) increase execution risk and can magnify price moves; top shareholders control ~86.4% limiting free float.
  • Model DCF produced negative intrinsic (model_inputs.dcf_intrinsic = -1,558.5) and the model marked the company as distressed, reducing confidence in valuation.

Sector Context

UNI sits in Vietnam's software & IT services cluster where peers show a wide spread of outcomes. Sector median implied upside is around 6.0%, comparable to UNI's 6.0% but many peers carry higher confidence or larger free floats. For Vietnamese technology names, investors must account for VAS accounting differences (revenue recognition and capitalization policies), and the Beneish/forensic checks are particularly relevant given recent local cases of aggressive recognition in software contracts. Small-cap tech names often trade with limited liquidity and concentrated ownership, amplifying governance and execution risk.

Risk Factors

  • High forensic risk: Beneish M-Score 0.8494 (manipulation likelihood) and Altman Z-Score 1.52 (distress zone) — elevated risk of accounting irregularities or insolvency events.
  • Illiquidity and concentrated ownership: average volume 2w = 3,034 and top five shareholders own ~86.4%, reducing free-float and increasing price impact for trades.
  • Negative/volatile earnings: EPS -0.2345 and net profit margin -0.2% despite gross margin 47.8% — conversion of gross profit to net income is weak.
  • Model and valuation fragility: DCF negative (model_inputs.dcf_intrinsic = -1,558.5) and the valuation relies on isotonic recalibration and a BVPS floor (VND 10,173.4).
  • Leverage: Debt/Equity 1.08 increases balance-sheet risk if operating cash flows fail to materialize.
  • Regulatory/accounting risks specific to Vietnam: VAS treatment of software revenues and related party transactions can materially affect reported earnings quality.

Catalysts

  • Release of audited annual report or any management commentary addressing the Beneish/Altman flags and explaining the surge in total assets.
  • Corporate actions that increase free float (share sale by major holder) or open foreign room could materially increase liquidity and rerate valuation multiples.
  • A clear, sustained conversion of high gross margins into positive net profit across several quarters would reduce forensic concerns and support valuation.

Forensic Assessment

Forensic flags are the primary concern. Beneish M-Score 0.8494 (above the manipulation threshold) and a year-over-year change of +2.89 indicate elevated risk of aggressive accounting onset. Altman Z-Score 1.52 places the company in the distress zone, consistent with the model's distressed flag (negative DCF intrinsic). Piotroski F-Score 2/9 corroborates weak fundamentals. Positive signals are limited: an Earnings Quality Score of 46.2/100 and DSRI of 0.7035 suggest some control over receivables and inventories, but these do not offset the high M-Score and distress warning. Overall, treat reported earnings and balance sheet items with skepticism until independent audit quality and management disclosures improve.

Track Record

The model's historical track record spans 12 years with a hit rate of 54.5%, which is mediocre — little better than coin-flip accuracy. Average realized upside across the sample is negative (avg_upside_pct = -63.1%), indicating that past intrinsic estimates have tended to overstate gains or fail to predict downside events. Given this mixed track record and the low current model confidence, place limited weight on the intrinsic estimate absent corroborating fundamental improvements.

Written by a language model on 2026-08-10 from this page’s own model outputs and financial statements, and may quote figures from that date. Descriptive analysis, not investment advice — no buy, sell or hold recommendation is given or implied.

See the statements behind the number

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

See the 2015-present track record

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor

See the earnings-quality breakdown

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

Financial Forensics

Beneish M-Score · 2025

High Risk
M 0.85 · 95th pctile vs peers
YoY ▲ +2.89
Conservative vs VN peersAggressive
Compare across the whole market

Ranked vs Vietnamese peers. The −1.78 Beneish cutoff is US-calibrated; ~28% of VN stocks exceed it.

DSRI
0.703
GMI
1.752
AQI
1.000
SGI
4.217
DEPI
1.000
SGAI
0.487
TATA
0.005
LVGI
0.317

Read the forensic analysis

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor

See the Piotroski, Altman and DuPont detail

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

Key Ratios

Fiscal year 2025
-27289.96P/E
P/B0.63
P/S60.61
ROE-0.0%
ROA-0.0%
EPS-0.23
BVPS10173.37
Gross Margin47.8%
Net Margin-0.2%
D/E1.08
Current Ratio6.72
Rev Growth321.7%
Profit Growth9688.0%
EV/EBITDA587.41
Div Yield0.0%

Company Overview

Issued Shares
42.6M
Charter Capital
426.2B VND
Sector (ICB L2)
Công nghệ Thông tin
Industry (ICB L3)
Phần mềm & Dịch vụ Máy tính
Sub-industry
Dịch vụ Máy tính
Company Type
CT

See who owns this company, and what else they own

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor
Computed 28/08/2026
Methodology & Disclosure

vnvalue is a methodology engine — not an advisor. Every number is the deterministic output of a published formula applied to public financial data. Nothing on this page constitutes investment, financial, legal, or tax advice, nor a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security.

All data, models, and outputs are provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions. Past performance and historical valuations are not indicative of future results.

By using vnvalue you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Full disclaimer →