Back to Dashboard

MTH

Consumer

Công ty Cổ phần Môi trường Đô thị Hà Đông

Hàng & Dịch vụ Công nghiệpTư vấn & Hỗ trợ Kinh doanhCT
25.000
VND · Last close
Valuation Verdict
Undervalued
Low
+12.1%
-120%Fair Value+120%
Current
25.000
Intrinsic Value
28.024
ModelFCF DCF

See how this valuation was built

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

See how the value moves with WACC and growth

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor
Research Note

MTH: Municipal waste-services cash-generative but illiquid; upside limited at current price

Intrinsic value VND 28,024 vs market VND 25,000 — implied upside 12.1% (model confidence: low).

Business Overview

Công ty Cổ phần Môi trường Đô thị Hà Đông (MTH) is a municipal-focused urban environment and waste-management services company listed on UPCoM. Its core activities are municipal cleaning and waste collection contracts in Hà Nội and surrounding districts, a business model characterised by long-term public-sector contracts and predictable cash flows. The company operates in a sector where assets and recurring service contracts matter more than volatile trade revenues; VAS accounting and local SOE/municipal contracting practices influence reported margins and asset bases.

MTH’s shareholder base is concentrated: the Ủy Ban Nhân Dân Thành Phố Hà Nội holds 25.5% and four individuals together hold the remaining controlling stakes (largest individual 23.44%). This ownership mix implies strong municipal relationship advantages for contract renewal, but also limits free-float and liquidity: two-week average traded volume is 1.0 share and the model flags the stock as illiquid.

Investment Thesis

MTH’s operating profile combines stable, contract-driven revenue with above-average profitability for a small municipal services operator. Revenue grew from VND 156.3 bn in 2023 to VND 171.2 bn in 2025, while net profit rose from VND 10.8 bn to VND 15.3 bn over the same period — implying margin resilience. Latest profitability metrics show ROE of 10.9%, ROA of 8.8% and an EBIT margin of 11.7%, with a P/E of 7.8 and P/B of 0.86, suggesting the market prices a modest valuation multiple for a stable cash generator.

Our blended intrinsic-value model (70% DCF, 30% PE) yields VND 28,024 per share with an implied upside of 12.1% to the VND 25,000 match price, but confidence is low. Key valuation drivers include base projected FCF, a WACC of 10.19% and terminal growth of 4.0%; the DCF input set produces a high raw intrinsic value that was calibrated downward (isotonic calibration) because of liquidity and modelling conservatism. The company reports net cash in the model inputs and has an EV/EBITDA of 3.16, supporting the view of a low-capital-intensity, cash-generative operation.

Counterbalancing strengths are the stable municipal contract backlog and high earnings quality (98.4/100). Primary weaknesses are severe illiquidity (avg 2-week volume 1.0), concentrated ownership (state + individuals >96%), and model confidence rated low — these factors raise execution and marketability risk for allocators. Given the 12.1% implied upside and low modelling confidence, the return profile is modest and fragile to execution or contract renewal setbacks.

Valuation Commentary

Blended valuation: 70% DCF (10-year explicit projection, WACC 10.19%, terminal g 4.0%) and 30% PE (fair PE 7.84, cap 25). The DCF result was calibrated (isotonic) to account for model sanity and liquidity flags.

  • Base free cash flow used: VND 30,605,439,385 (model base FCF).
  • WACC components: WACC 10.19%, equity cost 11.49%, debt after-tax 4.94%, debt weight 19.89%.
  • Growth assumptions: explicit growth rate 8.0% (historical blend), terminal growth 4.0%, projection years 10.
  • Valuation blend: DCF weight 0.7 and PE weight 0.3; fair PE applied 7.84.
  • Sanity adjustments for illiquidity: model raw intrinsic value was calibrated down (sanity flags: illiquid, illiquid_upside_capped).

The blended intrinsic VND 28,024 implies 12.1% upside but model confidence is low. The DCF inputs (positive free cash flow and net cash position) support value above the market price, yet illiquidity, concentrated shareholding and calibration constraints lower conviction — treat the intrinsic as indicative rather than high-confidence.

Bull vs Bear

Bull Case
  • Municipal contracts produce recurring revenue: revenue rose from VND 156.3 bn (2023) to VND 171.2 bn (2025), supporting predictable cash flow.
  • Strong cash generation and low capital intensity: EV/EBITDA 3.16 and model net cash position support balance-sheet resilience.
  • Attractive valuation multiples: P/E 7.8 and P/B 0.86 versus expected sector medians, implying upside to intrinsic VND 28,024.
  • High earnings quality (98.4/100) reduces accounting risk and supports the reported profitability (net profit VND 15.3 bn in 2025).
Bear Case
  • Severe liquidity constraints: average 2-week volume is 1.0 share and the model flags 'illiquid', making exit difficult for larger positions and causing upside to be capped.
  • Concentrated ownership: state + four individuals control >96% of shares, limiting free-float and potential for improved market pricing.
  • Low model confidence: calibration and 'low' confidence flag mean the VND 28,024 intrinsic is less reliable; small changes to contract renewals or discount rates materially affect value.
  • Municipal-contract risk: dependence on public-sector budgets and potential regulatory/SBV-related changes to municipal spending could reduce revenue growth below the modelled 8%.

Sector Context

MTH sits in the urban environment/waste-management fragment of consumer/business-support services. Competition is local and contract-based: incumbency with municipal authorities is a key moat. Regulatory context matters — SBV credit quotas and municipal budget cycles influence counterparties' ability to pay or renew contracts. VAS accounting for fixed assets and provisioning differs from IFRS; local practice can inflate book equity (BVPS VND 29,004) relative to free cash generation.

Peer universe shows a wide dispersion: sector median implied upside is c. 12.0% (351 peers), with some listed peers showing higher convexity but often higher liquidity and different risk profiles. For municipal-service SOEs, state ownership typically implies dividend/contract stability but also potential for political constraints on pricing and efficiency.

Risk Factors

  • Liquidity risk: two-week average volume is 1.0 share and the model marks the stock as illiquid, creating execution risk for sizable trades.
  • Shareholder concentration: the Ủy Ban Nhân Dân Thành Phố Hà Nội (25.5%) plus four individuals control the stock, which can hinder governance improvements and limit free-float.
  • Contract renewal and municipal budget risk: revenues depend on public contracts; delays or budget cuts would directly hit growth and cash flow.
  • Model confidence and calibration: valuation confidence is low and the model required isotonic calibration, increasing valuation uncertainty.
  • Marketability and trading risk on UPCoM: lower transparency and thinner trading relative to HSX/HNX peers can widen spreads and deter institutional flows.
  • Small-company operational risks: single-region concentration (Hà Đông/Hà Nội) increases exposure to local adverse events or regulatory changes.

Catalysts

  • Public-announced multi-year contract renewals with Hà Nội authorities or expansion into neighboring districts.
  • Improved liquidity or listing migration to HSX/HNX that increases free-float and institutional access.
  • Better-than-expected margin expansion or one-off cost reductions reflected in FY results (net profit rose to VND 15.3 bn in 2025).

Forensic Assessment

No Beneish M-Score provided and there are no forensic red flags in the input. Earnings-quality score is high at 98.4/100, which supports confidence in reported profits and reduces concerns about aggressive accounting. Given the absence of forensic flags, the primary governance/forensic concern is ownership concentration rather than accounting manipulation.

Track Record

The model has a 12-year track record with a hit rate of 63.6% (i.e., historically directional calls matched subsequent year moves in ~63.6% of years). Average historical upside for prior calls is large (average upside 265.2%), but that metric is skewed by outliers and smaller-cap illiquid names over a long sample. Given the current low confidence and illiquidity, historical hit-rate comfort should be applied cautiously.

Written by a language model on 2026-08-11 from this page’s own model outputs and financial statements, and may quote figures from that date. Descriptive analysis, not investment advice — no buy, sell or hold recommendation is given or implied.

See the statements behind the number

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

See the 2015-present track record

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor

See the earnings-quality breakdown

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

Financial Forensics

Beneish M-Score · 2025

Low Risk
M -3.36 · 7th pctile vs peers
YoY -0.09
Conservative vs VN peersAggressive
Compare across the whole market

Ranked vs Vietnamese peers. The −1.78 Beneish cutoff is US-calibrated; ~28% of VN stocks exceed it.

DSRI
0.845
GMI
0.926
AQI
0.817
SGI
1.004
DEPI
0.876
SGAI
1.135
TATA
-0.106
LVGI
1.275

See the Piotroski, Altman and DuPont detail

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

Key Ratios

Fiscal year 2025
7.84P/E
P/B0.86
P/S0.70
ROE10.9%
ROA8.7%
EPS3187.66
BVPS29004.44
Gross Margin20.8%
Net Margin8.1%
D/E0.30
Current Ratio3.22
EV/EBITDA3.16
Div Yield3.2%

Company Overview

Issued Shares
4.8M
Charter Capital
47.9B VND
Sector (ICB L2)
Hàng & Dịch vụ Công nghiệp
Industry (ICB L3)
Tư vấn & Hỗ trợ Kinh doanh
Sub-industry
Chất thải & Môi trường
Company Type
CT

See who owns this company, and what else they own

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor
Computed 28/08/2026
Methodology & Disclosure

vnvalue is a methodology engine — not an advisor. Every number is the deterministic output of a published formula applied to public financial data. Nothing on this page constitutes investment, financial, legal, or tax advice, nor a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security.

All data, models, and outputs are provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions. Past performance and historical valuations are not indicative of future results.

By using vnvalue you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Full disclaimer →