Back to Dashboard

TDM

Utilities

Công ty Cổ phần Nước Thủ Dầu Một

Điện, nước & xăng dầu khí đốtNước & Khí đốtCT
58.600
VND · Last close
Valuation Verdict
Undervalued
Very Low
+12.1%
-120%Fair Value+120%
Current
58.600
Intrinsic Value
65.678
ModelDDM 3STAGE

See how this valuation was built

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

See how the value moves with WACC and growth

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor
Research Note

Công ty Cổ phần Nước Thủ Dầu Một (TDM): regulated water utility with stable cash flows but earnings quality and liquidity concerns

Intrinsic value VND 67,583 vs market price VND 60,300 — implied upside 12.1% (confidence: very_low).

Business Overview

Công ty Cổ phần Nước Thủ Dầu Một (TDM) is a HOSE-listed utility operating in the water & gas subsector (ICB: Nước & Khí đốt). The company supplies treated water under regulated/tariff frameworks typical for Vietnamese municipal utilities, generating relatively stable revenue and high margin streams. TDM reported revenue of VND 506.1 bn in 2025 and operates capital-intensive assets (total assets VND 3,396.1 bn in 2025) where land use rights and concession-like arrangements can be important value drivers.

The shareholder base is moderately concentrated: the largest shareholder (Công ty Cổ phần Chứng khoán Vietcap) holds 13.96%; five largest holders account for material stakes but there is still meaningful free float — foreign ownership room stands at VND 60,334,497.7246 (available quota). As a regulated utility, TDM’s cash distributions and tariff adjustments are important inputs for valuation and investment returns, and SOE/municipal rules can affect dividend and capex decisions where applicable.

Investment Thesis

TDM’s appeal rests on predictable, high-margin water operations and a visible cash dividend history (DPS = VND 2,800 per share from events). Profitability metrics show robust margins for a utility: net profit margin 41.5% and EBIT margin 25.4%, with ROE of 8.2% and ROA of 6.5%. The company’s asset base has grown (total assets up from VND 2,603.5 bn in 2023 to VND 3,396.1 bn in 2025), implying ongoing capex or asset revaluation that supports future regulated earnings.

However, several factors weaken conviction. The model’s intrinsic value (DDM 3-stage) implies only 12.1% upside to VND 67,583 and the model confidence is very_low after recalibration; the model required isotonic calibration to lift a raw intrinsic value of VND 40,241 to the published VND 67,583, which signals model fragility. Earnings quality is mediocre (score 38.5/100) with forensic flags: Beneish M-Score -1.3944 (moderate risk), DSRI 1.8318 and GMI 1.6574 point to inventory and gross-margin deterioration risks. Liquidity is low (avg vol 2w = 55,777) and market multiples are rich relative to growth: P/E 33.6x and P/B 2.6x despite revenue declining -7.0% YoY in 2025 and net profit roughly flat between 2024–25 (VND 204.4 bn to VND 209.9 bn). Together, the narrow implied upside, very low model confidence, and forensic/liquidity concerns limit the risk-reward at current prices.

Valuation Commentary

Three-stage discounted dividend model (DDM) calibrated isotonicly to produce an intrinsic value of VND 67,583 per share.

  • DPS: VND 2,800 per share (source: corporate events).
  • Base growth: 3.5% (effective floor and terminal growth both 3.5%).
  • Cost of equity (Ke): 10.7% (rf 4.36%, ERP 4.38%, CRP 2.75%, beta 0.82).
  • High reported payout: payout ratio 148.22% (model therefore relies on dividends and calibration), TV contribution 66.79% of value.
  • Calibration: raw intrinsic value VND 40,241 adjusted to VND 67,583 via isotonic calibration; confidence labeled very_low.

The DDM produces a modest 12.1% upside, but confidence is very_low because the model required substantial calibration (raw IV VND 40,241 -> calibrated VND 67,583) and relies heavily on DPS and terminal value (TV = 66.8% of value). Given payout ratio >100% and mediocre earnings quality, the intrinsic estimate is highly sensitive to DPS sustainability and the chosen cost of equity/terminal growth. We treat the VND 67,583 figure as indicative rather than definitive.

Bull vs Bear

Bull Case
  • Stable, high conversion margins: net profit margin 41.5% and EBIT margin 25.4% provide scope for cash dividends even with modest revenue growth.
  • Visible cash return: DPS VND 2,800 supports current dividend yield ~2.2% (Dividend yield 2.16%).
  • Regulated utility characteristics and growing asset base (total assets VND 3,396.1 bn in 2025) underpin predictable long-term cash flows and low operational cyclicality.
Bear Case
  • Forensic flags: Beneish M-Score -1.3944 (moderate risk), DSRI 1.8318 and GMI 1.6574 signal inventory and gross-margin deterioration risk that could impair reported profits.
  • Model fragility: raw DDM IV VND 40,241 was isotonic-calibrated to VND 67,583; confidence labeled very_low — valuation sensitive to DPS and terminal assumptions.
  • Weak recent top-line: revenue declined -7.0% YoY in 2025 to VND 506.1 bn while multiples are rich (P/E 33.6x, EV/EBITDA 30.2x), leaving limited margin for execution misses.
  • Low liquidity (avg vol 2w = 55,777) and concentration in a few institutional holders may amplify price moves and reduce trading flexibility.

Sector Context

TDM sits in the water & gas utility group where regulatory tariffs, municipal contracts, and concession/land use rights structure cash flows. Sector peers show a median implied upside of 16.6%, slightly higher than TDM’s 12.1% — some peers (e.g., PSH, PPC, SJD) show materially higher upside but with varying confidence. Utilities in Vietnam often face SBV/SOEs influence on capex and dividend policies and VAS accounting differences (e.g., treatment of revaluations, infrastructure assets) can complicate cross-company comparisons. For banks and large SOEs, VAMC and government mandates are relevant; for utilities, watch tariff review cycles and municipal budget allocations that affect payment timings and allowed returns.

Risk Factors

  • Earnings-quality risks: Beneish M-Score -1.3944 (moderate) with DSRI 1.8318 and GMI 1.6574 — inventory build-up and declining gross margins could presage weaker cash profits.
  • Dividend sustainability: payout ratio reported at 148.22% implies DPS may not be covered by recurring earnings unless non-cash adjustments or asset transfers support payouts.
  • Liquidity and market risk: average 2-week volume 55,777 and low liquidity flag increase execution risk and volatility for large trades.
  • Valuation sensitivity: DDM relies on terminal value (TV = 66.8% of value) and assumptions (Ke 10.7%, terminal g 3.5%); small changes materially alter intrinsic value.
  • Operational/regulatory risk: as a municipal-style utility, tariff approval, service contracts, or mandated discounts could pressure margins.
  • Concentration in ownership: largest holder 14.0% and several institutional blocks could influence corporate actions and reduce float liquidity.

Catalysts

  • Tariff reviews or approved price adjustments that raise allowed returns or increase revenue visibility.
  • Improvement in earnings-quality indicators (lower DSRI, stabilising GMI) and clearer cash coverage for dividends.
  • Corporate actions: clarification on dividend policy, share buybacks, or asset monetisation that improve DPS sustainability or reduce payout risk.
  • Better liquidity / foreign investor demand that narrows the spread to peers (foreign room currently available).

Forensic Assessment

The Beneish M-Score of -1.3944 places TDM in a moderate manipulation risk bucket (threshold -1.78). Key red flags are DSRI 1.8318 (notable inventory increase versus sales) and GMI 1.6574 (gross-margin deterioration). Positives: earnings quality score 38.5/100 includes a strong accrual component (91.7/100) and SGI 0.9297 indicates sales growth is not outsized. Overall, the primary forensic concern is deteriorating gross margin and inventory dynamics that warrant monitoring; there are not definitive signs of aggressive manipulation but the combination elevates execution risk.

Track Record

Historical model performance over 11 years shows a hit rate of 0.0 and average realized upside -38.3% across the tracked period (2016–2026). This poor historical track record reduces confidence in the model’s directional calls. Use current model outputs conservatively and place more weight on forensic signals and cash/dividend metrics rather than past intrinsic estimates alone.

Written by a language model on 2026-08-10 from this page’s own model outputs and financial statements, and may quote figures from that date. Descriptive analysis, not investment advice — no buy, sell or hold recommendation is given or implied.

See the statements behind the number

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

See the 2015-present track record

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor

See the earnings-quality breakdown

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

Financial Forensics

Beneish M-Score · 2025

Moderate
M -1.39 · 82th pctile vs peers
YoY ▲ +2.01
Conservative vs VN peersAggressive
Compare across the whole market

Ranked vs Vietnamese peers. The −1.78 Beneish cutoff is US-calibrated; ~28% of VN stocks exceed it.

DSRI
1.832
GMI
1.657
AQI
1.261
SGI
0.930
DEPI
1.063
SGAI
1.193
TATA
0.021
LVGI
1.429

Read the forensic analysis

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor

See the Piotroski, Altman and DuPont detail

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

Key Ratios

Fiscal year 2025
32.65P/E
P/B2.52
P/S12.86
ROE8.2%
ROA6.5%
EPS1889.12
BVPS23265.67
Gross Margin28.6%
Net Margin41.5%
D/E0.31
Current Ratio1.66
Rev Growth-7.0%
Profit Growth2.7%
EV/EBITDA29.41
Div Yield2.2%

Company Overview

Issued Shares
122.2M
Charter Capital
1222.1B VND
Sector (ICB L2)
Điện, nước & xăng dầu khí đốt
Industry (ICB L3)
Nước & Khí đốt
Sub-industry
Nước
Company Type
CT

See who owns this company, and what else they own

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor
Computed 28/08/2026
Methodology & Disclosure

vnvalue is a methodology engine — not an advisor. Every number is the deterministic output of a published formula applied to public financial data. Nothing on this page constitutes investment, financial, legal, or tax advice, nor a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security.

All data, models, and outputs are provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions. Past performance and historical valuations are not indicative of future results.

By using vnvalue you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Full disclaimer →