
ALC
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
The Beneish M-Score of -1.945 indicates that ALC is below the manipulation threshold, suggesting a lower likelihood of earnings manipulation. However, the high SGI of 2.7008 and the relatively low DSRI of 0.0951 highlight potential concerns regarding growth sustainability and revenue recognition practices.
- SGI of 2.7008 indicates aggressive growth which may not be sustainable.
- GMI of 0.4031 suggests declining gross margins, which could impact profitability.
- Earnings Quality Score of 90.7/100 indicates strong earnings quality.
- High cash conversion score of 100.0/100 reflects effective cash management.
The top shareholders are predominantly institutional, holding 34.8% collectively, which may provide stability. However, the presence of significant individual shareholders could lead to potential conflicts of interest.
Investors should monitor ALC's growth strategies closely and assess the sustainability of its revenue streams. Given the strong earnings quality, consider a cautious investment approach while remaining vigilant for any signs of financial distress.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for ALC — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate