Back to Dashboard

HTC

Utilities

Công ty Cổ phần Thương mại Hóc Môn

Điện, nước & xăng dầu khí đốtNước & Khí đốtCT
31.500
VND · Last close
Valuation Verdict
Undervalued
Low
+16.2%
-120%Fair Value+120%
Current
31.500
Intrinsic Value
36.617
ModelDDM 3STAGE

See how this valuation was built

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

See how the value moves with WACC and growth

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor
Research Note

HTC: Regulated water & gas utility with stable cash flow but limited growth and execution risks

Intrinsic value VND 39,290 vs market VND 33,800 — implied upside 16.2% (model confidence: low).

Business Overview

Công ty Cổ phần Thương mại Hóc Môn (HTC) is listed on HNX in the Nước & Khí đốt (water & gas) sub‑industry and provides regulated utility services to local customers. The company has 16,499,993 shares outstanding and operates in a low‑growth, capital‑intensive segment where tariffs and service coverage determine long‑term cash flows.

As a regulated utility, HTC's revenue and cash generation are relatively stable compared with cyclical industrials, but growth is constrained by concession/permit limits and tariff-setting mechanisms. Large institutional shareholders (Tổng Công ty Bến Thành 23.86%, Công ty TNHH Đầu Tư Và Thương Mại Thiên Hải 17.0%) mean ownership is concentrated and potentially influenced by state/strategic priorities; foreign ownership room is closed (0.0%).

Investment Thesis

HTC's valuation reflects a modest premium for stable, regulated cash flow: our DDM 3‑stage intrinsic value of VND 39,290 per share implies 16.2% upside to the current price of VND 33,800. Key support for the company is recurring cash generation (three‑year revenue roughly stable at VND 1,005–1,042 bn) and a visible dividend history (model DPS input VND 2,800).

Counterbalancing that are weak top‑line dynamics and mediocre profitability: revenue declined slightly from VND 1,042.2 bn in 2023 to VND 1,005.0 bn in 2025, and net profit fell from VND 46.2 bn (2023) to VND 29.5 bn (2025). ROE is 9.8% while EBIT margin is only 2.7%, leaving limited room for faster earnings growth. The model flags a payout_ratio of 150.7%, indicating dividends may be financed from reserves or one‑offs rather than sustainable earnings.

Execution and liquidity constraints increase implementation risk. Average daily volume is low (avg_volume_2w 778 shares), the stock is labeled illiquid in model sanity_flags, and earnings_quality scores 35.8/100 (described as mediocre). Combined with closed foreign room and concentrated institutional ownership, these factors limit marketability and amplify downside in negative scenarios. Given the model's low confidence, the implied ~16% upside is insufficiently wide to offset these execution and liquidity risks for a high‑conviction trade.

Valuation Commentary

Three‑stage dividend discount model (DDM) calibrated isotonic to a raw intrinsic value; dividends drive most of the valuation.

  • Model DPS: VND 2,800 per share (source: events)
  • Cost of equity (ke): 10.7% with components rf 4.36%, ERP 4.38%, CRP 2.75%, beta 0.82
  • Terminal growth: 3.5% and terminal value contribution 66.79% (tv_pct 0.6679)
  • Base growth: 3.5% informed by ROE 10.01% and retention ratio 10% (model weight on fundamental_equity 82.01%)
  • Calibration: raw intrinsic VND 40,241.1 adjusted to VND 39,290 (confidence labeled low)

The DDM produces VND 39,290 per share (16.2% upside). The valuation is sensitive to DPS sustainability and the cost of equity; given the model's low confidence, illiquidity and mediocre earnings quality, we place limited conviction on the upside and treat the target as a reference point rather than a high‑certainty fair value.

Bull vs Bear

Bull Case
  • Stable regulated cash flows: revenue has been broadly stable at VND 1,005–1,042 bn over 2023–2025, supporting steady dividends (DPS input VND 2,800).
  • Dividend yield in model and high payout policy could attract income‑focused holders: model payout_ratio 150.71% and dividend yield 3.85% at current price.
  • Low implied growth assumptions: base growth 3.5% and terminal g 3.5% mean modest execution could validate the DDM intrinsic value of VND 39,290.
  • Relative sector positioning: sector median upside ~16.6% — HTC's implied 16.2% is in line with peers, reducing relative valuation risk.
Bear Case
  • Earnings deterioration: net profit fell from VND 46.2 bn (2023) to VND 29.5 bn (2025) and revenue is slightly down (2023 VND 1,042.2 bn to 2025 VND 1,005.0 bn).
  • Mediocre earnings quality (35.8/100) and model sanity_flag 'mediocre_earnings_quality' raise concerns about recurring cash conversion.
  • Liquidity and marketability risks: avg_volume_2w 778 shares and 'illiquid' flag; foreign_room 0.0% limits inflows from overseas investors.
  • High reported payout ratio (150.7%) suggests dividends may not be fully sustainable from operating earnings, risking future cuts.

Sector Context

HTC operates in Vietnam's regulated water & gas space where tariff mechanisms, local government concessions and capital investment plans determine growth. Compared with 141 listed peers in the broader sector, the median model upside is approximately 16.6%, putting HTC close to peer median valuation expectations.

Regulatory and accounting context matters: VAS accounting and local regulation can produce differences in reported asset bases and timing of expense recognition versus IFRS peers. For state‑linked utilities, shareholder mandates (including SOE payout expectations) and access to concessional funding or local financing can materially affect capital expenditure plans and dividends. HTC's concentrated institutional ownership and zero foreign room mean policy or local investor actions will have outsized influence on corporate decisions.

Risk Factors

  • Dividend sustainability: model payout_ratio 150.71% indicates dividends could be funded from reserves or one‑offs rather than recurring earnings.
  • Earnings quality: score 35.8/100 (mediocre) increases risk that reported profits may not fully convert to cash flow.
  • Liquidity and tradability: avg_volume_2w 778 and 'illiquid' flag mean wider spreads and larger price impact for trades; foreign_room 0.0% prevents offshore demand.
  • Profitability and growth constraints: ROE 9.8%, EBIT margin 2.7% and three‑year net profit decline from VND 46.2 bn to VND 29.5 bn.
  • Concentrated ownership: top holder holds 23.86% and top three exceed ~51% (23.86% + 17.0% + 10.2% = 51.06%), which can limit minority shareholder influence and lead to related‑party or strategic decisions not aligned with minority holders.
  • Regulatory/tariff risk: as a regulated utility, tariff approval processes and local government policy can materially affect revenue and returns.

Catalysts

  • Announcement or confirmation of a sustainable dividend policy (clarifying whether recent high payout is repeatable).
  • Tariff adjustments or regulatory approvals that increase allowed returns on invested capital.
  • Improvement in operating margins or a clear cost‑reduction program reversing recent net profit declines.
  • Liquidity improvement (increased free float or removal of foreign room constraint) that could compress P/E discount.

Forensic Assessment

No Beneish M‑Score is provided (mscore null), so there is no explicit manipulation signal from that test. However, the model raised 'mediocre_earnings_quality' and earnings_quality is low at 35.8/100; together these are the principal forensic concerns. The balance sheet shows roughly stable total assets (~VND 600 bn) but declining net profit, which warrants monitoring of cash conversion and non‑operating items. Ownership concentration (top holder 23.86%) increases governance risk; foreign_room is 0.0%, reducing external market discipline.

Track Record

Model track record spans 12 years (2015–2026) with a hit_rate of 36.4% — substantially below coin‑flip levels and indicating limited historical directional reliability. Average historical upside when correct is large (avg_upside_pct 47.7%), but given the low hit rate the model's signals should be treated cautiously and paired with company‑level forensic checks and liquidity considerations.

Written by a language model on 2026-08-10 from this page’s own model outputs and financial statements, and may quote figures from that date. Descriptive analysis, not investment advice — no buy, sell or hold recommendation is given or implied.

See the statements behind the number

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

See the 2015-present track record

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor

See the earnings-quality breakdown

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

Financial Forensics

Beneish M-Score · 2025

Low Risk
M -2.31 · 49th pctile vs peers
YoY ▲ +0.26
Conservative vs VN peersAggressive
Compare across the whole market

Ranked vs Vietnamese peers. The −1.78 Beneish cutoff is US-calibrated; ~28% of VN stocks exceed it.

DSRI
1.132
GMI
0.974
AQI
0.829
SGI
0.990
DEPI
1.000
SGAI
1.107
TATA
0.035
LVGI
1.018

See the Piotroski, Altman and DuPont detail

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

Key Ratios

Fiscal year 2025
17.63P/E
P/B1.80
P/S0.52
ROE9.8%
ROA4.9%
EPS1787.09
BVPS18224.83
Gross Margin13.8%
Net Margin2.9%
D/E0.99
Current Ratio1.59
Rev Growth-1.0%
Profit Growth-8.3%
EV/EBITDA17.01
Div Yield4.1%

Company Overview

Issued Shares
16.5M
Charter Capital
165.0B VND
Sector (ICB L2)
Điện, nước & xăng dầu khí đốt
Industry (ICB L3)
Nước & Khí đốt
Sub-industry
Phân phối xăng dầu & khí đốt
Company Type
CT

See who owns this company, and what else they own

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor
Computed 28/08/2026
Methodology & Disclosure

vnvalue is a methodology engine — not an advisor. Every number is the deterministic output of a published formula applied to public financial data. Nothing on this page constitutes investment, financial, legal, or tax advice, nor a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security.

All data, models, and outputs are provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions. Past performance and historical valuations are not indicative of future results.

By using vnvalue you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Full disclaimer →