Back to Dashboard

LQN

Construction

Công ty Cổ phần Licogi Quảng Ngãi

Xây dựng và Vật liệuCT
3.000
VND · Last close
Valuation Verdict
Overvalued
Low
-34.6%
-120%Fair Value+120%
Current
3.000
Intrinsic Value
1.962
ModelEV EBITDA MIDCYCLE

See how this valuation was built

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

See how the value moves with WACC and growth

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor
Research Note

Licogi Quảng Ngãi (LQN): distressed balance sheet, limited upside vs market price

Intrinsic value VND 1,962 vs market VND 3,000; implied downside -34.6% (model confidence: low).

Business Overview

Công ty Cổ phần Licogi Quảng Ngãi (LQN) is a small UPCom-listed construction company operating in building and materials (ICB: Xây dựng và Vật liệu). Revenue has been volatile: VND 11.5 bn in 2023, VND 37.5 bn in 2024 and VND 25.2 bn in 2025, reflecting project timing and a limited asset base. The firm shows negative equity on reported accounts (BVPS VND -9,739), negative EPS and recurring net losses in the last three reported years, indicating a distressed financial position. The majority shareholder is Tổng Công ty LICOGI with 64.77% ownership, leaving limited free float and constrained trading liquidity (avg volume 2w: 4 shares).

Investment Thesis

Licogi Quảng Ngãi’s balance sheet and operating profile point to elevated execution and solvency risk. Key negatives: net losses in 2023–25 (net profit VND -7.5 bn, -1.9 bn, -1.6 bn), negative EPS (VND -850 per share) and negative BVPS (VND -9,739) indicate the company is loss-making and reporting negative equity. Profitability margins are weak: EBIT margin -1.1% and net margin -6.4% despite a gross margin of 18.2%, suggesting cost structure or non-operating losses are eroding results. The EV/EBITDA of 15.2x appears elevated given the distressed status and negative mid-cycle EBITDA flag in the valuation model.

On the other hand, there are structural supports: revenue recovered from VND 11.5 bn in 2023 to VND 37.5 bn in 2024 before easing to VND 25.2 bn in 2025, and gross margins are positive at 18.2%, showing the core construction business can generate project-level gross profit. The dominant ownership by Tổng Công ty LICOGI (64.8%) implies strategic backing and potential access to group-level resources or contracts, although it also concentrates control and reduces free float (foreign room: 927,668 shares).

Valuation vs market: our EV/EBITDA mid-cycle model produces an intrinsic price of VND 1,962 versus a match price of VND 3,000, implying downside of -34.6% with low model confidence. Given the distressed flags (negative equity, negative EBITDA history) and very low liquidity (avg volume 4 shares over two weeks), the implied downside does not compensate for refinancing or execution risk. The low model confidence and data-sensitivity mean any view should be cautious and contingent on balance-sheet repair or sustained return to positive operating profit.

Valuation Commentary

EV/EBITDA mid-cycle model adapted for a distressed profile; calibration used isotonic recalibration given negative historic EBITDA and sanity flags.

  • Intrinsic value set at VND 1,962 per share from an EV/EBITDA mid-cycle approach.
  • Model flagged as distressed because of negative EBITDA history and negative equity.
  • Calibration used 7 years of data and isotonic recalibration; raw intrinsic value before calibration was 0.
  • Sanity flags: illiquid market and negative equity reduce model confidence to 'low'.

The VND 1,962 intrinsic value implies -34.6% downside vs the current VND 3,000 price. Confidence in the estimate is low due to distressed accounting (negative equity, negative EBITDA) and illiquidity; the fair-value signal should be treated as indicative rather than definitive. Any re-rating requires clear evidence of sustained positive operating cash flow, balance-sheet normalization or a strategic capital injection.

Bull vs Bear

Bull Case
  • Core construction gross margin of 18.2% implies projects can generate positive project-level profits if overheads/non-operating losses are controlled.
  • Revenue showed recovery to VND 37.5 bn in 2024 before a pullback to VND 25.2 bn in 2025, indicating commercial activity that could scale if management secures more contracts.
  • Majority ownership by Tổng Công ty LICOGI (64.77%) could facilitate access to group contracts, guarantees or recapitalization if the parent prioritizes the subsidiary.
Bear Case
  • Negative equity (BVPS VND -9,739) and three consecutive years of net losses (VND -7.5 bn in 2023; VND -1.9 bn in 2024; VND -1.6 bn in 2025) indicate solvency stress and potential need for recapitalization.
  • Low liquidity (avg volume 2w = 4 shares) and small free float make market-price discovery poor and increase exit risk for investors.
  • Valuation model flags distressed status and produces an intrinsic VND 1,962 implying -34.6% downside; model confidence is low and EV/EBITDA sits at 15.2x despite negative operating trends.
  • Concentrated ownership (64.8% by the parent) reduces minority shareholder protections and limits the likelihood of an independent turnaround absent parent support.

Sector Context

The construction and building materials sector in Vietnam faces cyclical demand tied to real estate and infrastructure spending, and companies often present lumpy earnings due to project timing and recognition under VAS. State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) credit quotas and developer funding constraints can tighten project pipelines for small contractors. For banks, VAMC bonds and regulatory forbearance have been important; for small contractors and SOE-owned subsidiaries the interplay of SOE mandates and group allocation of work matters. Comparable listed peers show a wide dispersion: sector median implied upside is 9.6% but several peers also display low-confidence valuations. For LQN, land-use rights exposure appears limited in reported assets (total assets VND 49.4 bn in 2025) but negative equity complicates the recovery of asset values under VAS.

Risk Factors

  • Solvency risk: reported negative equity (BVPS VND -9,739) increases the chance of restructuring or dilution.
  • Earnings volatility: consecutive net losses (VND -7.5 bn in 2023; -1.9 bn in 2024; -1.6 bn in 2025) and negative EPS (VND -850) make near-term profitability uncertain.
  • Liquidity and marketability: avg trading volume over 2 weeks is 4 shares and high ownership concentration (64.77%); trading may be sporadic and spreads wide.
  • Model risk and data quality: valuation flagged distressed inputs and used recalibration; model confidence is low, so valuation is sensitive to assumptions.
  • Counterparty/project risk: revenue is project-driven (VND 25.2 bn in 2025); delays or contract disputes would materially hurt cash flow.
  • Foreign ownership room and capital access: foreign_room is 927,668 shares but local liquidity and strategic ownership reduce practical access to external equity.
  • Operational leverage: gross margin (18.2%) contrasts with negative EBIT margin (-1.1%), indicating fixed costs or non-operating charges that could worsen with lower revenue.

Catalysts

  • Parent-level support or recapitalization from Tổng Công ty LICOGI (64.77% owner).
  • Contract wins that sustainably increase revenue above recent mid-cycle levels and restore positive EBITDA.
  • Asset disposals or restructuring that materially reduce liabilities and eliminate negative equity.
  • Improved trading liquidity or a corporate action increasing free float (rights issue, privatization, or spin-off).

Forensic Assessment

No Beneish M-Score is available for LQN; forensic flags from the input are limited. The primary forensic concerns are earnings quality and ownership concentration rather than explicit manipulation scores: earnings quality sits at 52.4/100 (moderate), while negative equity and recurring losses raise questions about accounting for provisions, impairment and related-party transactions under VAS. Given the lack of explicit red flags in the forensic input, the headline issues are economic distress and opaque recovery prospects rather than clear accounting manipulation.

Track Record

The model's historical track record across nine years shows a hit rate of 87.5% and an average historical upside of 80.8%, which is strong on a multi-year basis. However, the current valuation confidence is 'low' and the model flagged the company as distressed; past model performance does not eliminate idiosyncratic risk in an illiquid, loss-making name with negative equity. Use the historical hit rate as supportive context but not definitive proof of forward predictive power for this specific distressed case.

Written by a language model on 2026-08-11 from this page’s own model outputs and financial statements, and may quote figures from that date. Descriptive analysis, not investment advice — no buy, sell or hold recommendation is given or implied.

See the statements behind the number

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

See the 2015-present track record

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor

See the earnings-quality breakdown

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

Financial Forensics

Beneish M-Score · 2025

Low Risk
M -3.18 · 10th pctile vs peers
YoY -1.04
Conservative vs VN peersAggressive
Compare across the whole market

Ranked vs Vietnamese peers. The −1.78 Beneish cutoff is US-calibrated; ~28% of VN stocks exceed it.

DSRI
1.106
GMI
0.695
AQI
1.411
SGI
0.673
DEPI
1.000
SGAI
1.973
TATA
-0.067
LVGI
1.100

See the Piotroski, Altman and DuPont detail

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

Key Ratios

Fiscal year 2025
-3.53P/E
P/B0.00
P/S0.23
ROE9.1%
ROA-2.8%
EPS-850.11
BVPS-9738.81
Gross Margin18.2%
Net Margin-6.4%
D/E-3.68
Current Ratio0.42
EV/EBITDA15.23
Div Yield0.0%

Company Overview

Issued Shares
1.9M
Charter Capital
18.9B VND
Sector (ICB L2)
Xây dựng và Vật liệu
Industry (ICB L3)
Xây dựng và Vật liệu
Sub-industry
Xây dựng
Company Type
CT

See who owns this company, and what else they own

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor
Computed 28/08/2026
Methodology & Disclosure

vnvalue is a methodology engine — not an advisor. Every number is the deterministic output of a published formula applied to public financial data. Nothing on this page constitutes investment, financial, legal, or tax advice, nor a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security.

All data, models, and outputs are provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions. Past performance and historical valuations are not indicative of future results.

By using vnvalue you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Full disclaimer →