CCM
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — CCM
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2024
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2016
CCM exhibits a Beneish M-Score of -3.0428, indicating a low likelihood of earnings manipulation. However, the high ownership concentration among a few individuals and the presence of a significant institutional investor may pose governance risks.
- High ownership concentration: Top 5 shareholders hold 92.2% of shares, which may lead to governance issues and lack of minority shareholder protection.
- Earnings Quality Score of 79.2/100 indicates strong overall earnings quality, particularly with a perfect cash conversion rate of 100.0/100.
The significant concentration of ownership among a few individuals raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest and limited oversight, which could negatively impact minority shareholders.
Investors should monitor governance practices closely and consider engaging with management to ensure transparency, while also recognizing the strong earnings quality metrics as a positive factor.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for CCM — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate