
GMX
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — GMX
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2024
GMX presents a moderate risk profile with a Beneish M-Score of -2.8626, indicating no immediate signs of earnings manipulation. However, the earnings quality metrics show some weaknesses, particularly in revenue recognition, which could raise concerns about sustainability.
- Earnings Quality Score of 74.9/100 indicates potential issues, especially with an eq_revenue score of 0.0/100, suggesting significant discrepancies in revenue recognition.
- Beneish M-Score of -2.8626 is well below the manipulation threshold of -1.78, indicating a lower likelihood of earnings manipulation.
The ownership structure is relatively fragmented with no single shareholder holding a controlling stake, which may reduce the risk of insider manipulation but could also lead to governance challenges.
Investors should closely monitor GMX's revenue recognition practices and consider conducting further due diligence on its earnings quality, particularly in light of the low revenue score.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for GMX — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate