EIN
CyclicalsValuation Breakdown
Cyclical companies (chemicals, oil & gas, basic resources) have earnings that swing dramatically with commodity prices and economic cycles. Valuing them on a single year's earnings is misleading: they look cheap at peaks and expensive at troughs. This model uses 7-year median EBITDA ("mid-cycle" earnings) and a 7-year median EV/EBITDA multiple to estimate what the firm is worth at a normal point in the cycle.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — EIN
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2024
EIN displays several concerning indicators of potential earnings manipulation, particularly with a Beneish M-Score of -2.5422, which is below the manipulation threshold. While the earnings quality score is moderate, the significant reliance on institutional ownership suggests potential risks in governance and decision-making.
- Beneish M-Score of -2.5422 indicates potential earnings manipulation, as it is below the threshold of -1.78.
- Earnings quality metrics show a very low cash conversion score of 1.1/100, suggesting poor cash flow relative to earnings.
- Strong institutional ownership with the top two shareholders holding 53.3% combined, which may provide stability and oversight.
The high concentration of institutional ownership (53.3%) could lead to governance issues, particularly if the interests of these entities diverge from minority shareholders.
Investors should conduct further due diligence on cash flow management and consider monitoring changes in institutional ownership, while remaining cautious about potential earnings manipulation.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for EIN — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate