Back to Dashboard

CEO

Real Estate

Công ty Cổ phần Tập đoàn C.E.O

Bất động sảnCT
13.400
VND · Last close
Valuation Verdict
Undervalued
Very Low
+16.6%
-120%Fair Value+120%
Current
13.400
Intrinsic Value
15.630
ModelDCF LEVERAGE SCREEN

See how this valuation was built

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

See how the value moves with WACC and growth

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor
Research Note

Công ty Cổ phần Tập đoàn C.E.O — blended DCF/rNAV implies modest upside but confidence is very low

Target VND 13,764 vs market VND 11,800 — implied upside 16.6% (confidence: very_low).

Business Overview

Công ty Cổ phần Tập đoàn C.E.O (CEO) is listed on HNX and operates in the real estate sector (ICB: Bất động sản). The company’s most recent published scale shows revenues of VND 1,338.7 bn in 2025 and total assets of VND 8,730.1 bn the same year, reflecting a slight contraction from 2023 levels. CEO’s business combines property development and related services; as a Vietnamese property group its balance sheet and valuation depend heavily on land-use rights valuation, timing of project completions, and revaluation gains under VAS.

Investment Thesis

CEO’s valuation is driven by a blended approach (60% DCF, 40% rNAV) that yields an intrinsic value of VND 13,764 per share, implying 16.6% upside to the match price of VND 11,800. The model inputs show a conservative perpetual growth floor of 3.5%, WACC of 10.3%, and an rNAV revaluation factor that materially lifts the rNAV leg (rNAV intrinsic VND 13,679.5; DCF intrinsic VND 5,398.2). The company reports a modest ROE of 2.9% and ROA of 2.0%, with net profit of VND 177.3 bn in 2025 — profitability exists but is well below what a high-growth developer would deliver.

Balance of positives and execution risk: CEO trades at P/B 1.1 and P/E 42.9, indicating the market prices limited growth and/or execution risk into the multiple. The model flags mediocre earnings quality (score 49.2) and overall confidence in the intrinsic estimate is very_low; therefore the implied 16.6% upside is not accompanied by high model conviction. Ownership is concentrated: an individual holds 18.9%, with institutional names like PYN Elite Fund at ~4.95% — concentration can be a governance plus for stability or a single-holder risk depending on shareholder alignment.

Given the combination of modest upside, very_low model confidence, mediocre earnings-quality signals, and the cyclical/regulatory exposure of Vietnamese real estate (VAS revaluations, timing of land-use-right recognition, and sensitivity to credit cycles), the investment case is balanced but lacks high conviction. The upside is meaningful but insufficiently supported by forensic confidence and execution visibility to classify as a high-conviction opportunity.

Valuation Commentary

Blended intrinsic value using a 60% DCF (levered) and 40% rNAV blend; rNAV leg is upweighted by a revaluation factor to reflect property mark-ups.

  • Intrinsic value per share: VND 13,764 (model upside 16.6% vs current VND 11,800).
  • DCF inputs: base cash flow VND 188,625,908,048; WACC 10.3%; terminal growth 3.5%; DCF intrinsic VND 5,398.2.
  • rNAV inputs: rNAV intrinsic VND 13,679.5 with revaluation factor 1.5 and effective factor 1.25 (property ratio 7.21%).
  • Model blend: 60% DCF / 40% rNAV; tv_pct (terminal value share) 72.75% of enterprise value.
  • Key capital structure: implied D/E 0.36 and interest coverage 7.61; model shows net cash (net_debt negative).

The blended approach produces a mid-single-digit-to-teens upside (16.6%) but the model confidence is very_low and flags mediocre earnings quality, so the intrinsic estimate should be treated cautiously. The DCF leg is materially lower than the rNAV leg (VND 5,398 vs VND 13,679), meaning valuation is sensitive to property revaluation assumptions and the rNAV revaluation factor. We have limited confidence in precise upside; upside is meaningful but not definitive.

Bull vs Bear

Bull Case
  • Blended intrinsic VND 13,764 implies 16.6% upside from current VND 11,800 — potential rerating if asset revaluations crystallize.
  • rNAV leg is strong: rNAV intrinsic VND 13,679.5 and revaluation factor 1.5 lift value, reflecting recoverable land-use rights and property inventory optionality.
  • Net leverage is low in the model (net_debt reported as negative), and interest coverage is healthy at 7.61, reducing near-term refinancing risk.
  • Stable recent earnings: net profit was VND 177.3 bn in 2025 after VND 190.2 bn in 2024, showing continued profitability.
Bear Case
  • Mediocre earnings quality (score 49.2) and a model 'very_low' confidence flag undermine conviction in the intrinsic value and suggest potential accounting or recognition volatility.
  • Low returns: ROE 2.9% and ROA 2.0% indicate the business is not generating high incremental returns on capital relative to peers.
  • High valuation multiple on earnings: P/E 42.9 and EV/EBITDA 19.9 suggest market expectations are premium to current operational performance; downside if earnings slip.
  • Top shareholder concentration (18.9% individual) creates governance/execution risk if insider incentives diverge from minority holders; foreign room remains limited at VND 273,242,439.71618766 available (room is finite).

Sector Context

Vietnam real estate remains sensitive to SBV credit guidance for property lending, local land-use-right accounting under VAS, and project permitting/timing. Developers with sizable unsold inventory or long project pipelines face mark-to-market and liquidity timing risk; rNAV approaches are common in valuations because balance-sheet asset revaluations and land-banked assets are material. CEO sits in a large peer group (123 listed peers). The sector median implied upside is c. 22.1%, placing CEO’s 16.6% below the sector median. Top peers show mixed confidence levels in their models; several peers exhibit higher upside but often with low/very_low confidence as well. For banks and financing partners, VAMC bonds and SBV credit quotas remain structural considerations for property firms’ access to liquidity.

Risk Factors

  • Mediocre earnings quality (score 49.2) — suggests variability in reported profits or one-off items that could impair predictability.
  • Execution and project-timing risk: rNAV-driven value depends on successful revaluation and sale of property inventory and land-use-right recognition under VAS.
  • Concentrated ownership: largest shareholder is an individual at 18.9%, which can amplify insider-driven decisions or related-party risks.
  • High P/E (42.9) and modest ROE (2.9%) — valuation is exposed if profitability deteriorates or growth disappoints.
  • Liquidity and market risk: 1-year high/low range is wide (VND 31,334 to VND 10,000), indicating historical volatility and potential liquidity-driven price swings.
  • Model uncertainty: valuation confidence is very_low — intrinsic estimate is sensitive to revaluation and growth assumptions.

Catalysts

  • Completed project handovers or landmark sales that crystallize rNAV uplift and demonstrate cash realization.
  • Transparent asset revaluations or independent appraisals that materially increase book value per share (BVPS currently VND 10,943.6).
  • Improved earnings quality disclosures (higher cash conversion / operating cash flow) reducing the model's sanity flag.
  • Sector-wide liquidity easing or favorable SBV guidance for property lending that improves sales and financing availability.

Forensic Assessment

No Beneish M-Score is available (mscore: null) and there are no explicit forensic red flags in the input beyond the model's 'mediocre_earnings_quality' sanity flag and an earnings-quality score of 49.2. Given those inputs, the primary forensic concern is earnings quality rather than clear manipulation signals. Investors should seek improved cash-flow disclosure and reconcile non-cash revaluation items before granting high conviction.

Track Record

The model has a 12-year track record with a hit rate of 54.5% (6.6/12 approx), meaning it has been directionally correct slightly more often than not historically. Average historical upside on past calls has been 33.9%. Given the current model confidence is very_low, historical performance provides some context but is not a substitute for stronger forensic and operational transparency.

Written by a language model on 2026-08-10 from this page’s own model outputs and financial statements, and may quote figures from that date. Descriptive analysis, not investment advice — no buy, sell or hold recommendation is given or implied.

See the statements behind the number

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

See the 2015-present track record

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor

See the earnings-quality breakdown

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

Financial Forensics

Beneish M-Score · 2025

Low Risk
M -2.32 · 49th pctile vs peers
YoY -0.02
Conservative vs VN peersAggressive
Compare across the whole market

Ranked vs Vietnamese peers. The −1.78 Beneish cutoff is US-calibrated; ~28% of VN stocks exceed it.

DSRI
0.959
GMI
0.862
AQI
1.168
SGI
1.023
DEPI
0.925
SGAI
1.255
TATA
0.041
LVGI
0.871

See the Piotroski, Altman and DuPont detail

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

Key Ratios

Fiscal year 2025
48.71P/E
P/B1.22
P/S5.68
ROE2.9%
ROA2.0%
EPS312.44
BVPS10943.56
Gross Margin31.1%
Net Margin15.4%
D/E0.36
Current Ratio2.78
Rev Growth2.3%
Profit Growth-6.8%
EV/EBITDA22.72
Div Yield0.0%

Company Overview

Issued Shares
595.8M
Charter Capital
5957.8B VND
Sector (ICB L2)
Bất động sản
Industry (ICB L3)
Bất động sản
Sub-industry
Bất động sản
Company Type
CT

See who owns this company, and what else they own

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor
Computed 28/08/2026
Methodology & Disclosure

vnvalue is a methodology engine — not an advisor. Every number is the deterministic output of a published formula applied to public financial data. Nothing on this page constitutes investment, financial, legal, or tax advice, nor a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security.

All data, models, and outputs are provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions. Past performance and historical valuations are not indicative of future results.

By using vnvalue you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Full disclaimer →