Back to Dashboard

LAF

Consumer

Công ty Cổ phần Chế biến Hàng Xuất khẩu Long An

Thực phẩm và đồ uốngSản xuất thực phẩmCT
19.950
VND · Last close
Valuation Verdict
Undervalued
Low
+12.1%
-120%Fair Value+120%
Current
19.950
Intrinsic Value
22.363
ModelFCF DCF

See how this valuation was built

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

See how the value moves with WACC and growth

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor
Research Note

LAF: mid-single-digit upside vs material forensic and liquidity risks

Intrinsic value VND 21,859 vs market VND 19,500, implied upside 12.1% (confidence: low).

Business Overview

Công ty Cổ phần Chế biến Hàng Xuất khẩu Long An (LAF) operates in food manufacturing (ICB: Sản xuất thực phẩm) with listed equity on HOSE. The company reported revenue growth from VND 431.5 bn in 2023 to VND 616.0 bn in 2025 and generated net profit of VND 40.1 bn in 2025. Principal shareholders include Công ty Cổ phần Tập đoàn PAN with 77.9% ownership, which is material for corporate strategy and minority governance dynamics. The stock trades with a P/E of 7.79 and P/B of 1.1521; EPS is VND 2,634.95 and BVPS is VND 16,926.16 per share.

Investment Thesis

LAF's operating profile shows a combination of rapid top-line expansion and modest profitability: revenue rose to VND 616.0 bn in 2025 (2025 revenue +32.9% YoY) while net profit was VND 40.1 bn in 2025 after VND 45.0 bn in 2024. Profitability metrics are reasonable for the sector — ROE 15.9% and ROA 8.4% — and the company yields a cash dividend of 7.7%, which supports income-oriented ownership.

Offsetting these positives are significant forensic and liquidity flags that materially increase execution risk. The model's intrinsic value of VND 21,859 implies only 12.1% upside versus the market price, and our confidence in that valuation is low. The Beneish M-Score (-0.3787) sits above the usual manipulation threshold, the earnings quality score is very poor at 10.1/100, and the Altman Z-Score places the company in a grey zone per the forensic summary. These concerns, together with low two-week average daily volume (avg_volume_2w = 3,818 shares) and a large controlling shareholder (77.9%), argue for caution despite an attractive yield and low P/E.

Valuation Commentary

Blended intrinsic value using a 70/30 DCF-to-PE blend anchored by a projected free cash flow path and a terminal growth rate.

  • Base FCF input: VND 81,841,370,184 (base_fcf).
  • WACC of 10.0% and terminal growth 4.0% used in the DCF; DCF leg yields VND 77,414.1 per share.
  • PE leg uses a fair PE of 7.79 producing VND 20,526.2 per share.
  • Final blended intrinsic value: VND 21,859 (weights: DCF 70%, PE 30%); TV accounts for 57.09% of value.

The blended intrinsic value implies 12.1% upside but model confidence is low due to illiquidity and earnings-quality 'sanity flags'. Given the low confidence and forensic red flags, the 12.1% implied upside is insufficient to overcome execution and accounting risks without clearer evidence of cash conversion improvement.

Bull vs Bear

Bull Case
  • Attractive payout: Dividend yield of 7.7% supports total return even if capital appreciation is limited.
  • Profitability metrics are reasonable: ROE 15.9% and EBIT margin 9.8% with gross margin 15.4%.
  • Top-line momentum: Revenue increased to VND 616.0 bn in 2025 (2025 revenue up 32.9% YoY), indicating demand for products.
Bear Case
  • Forensic red flags: Beneish M-Score -0.3787 (above manipulation threshold) and earnings quality 10.1/100 indicate aggressive accounting and poor cash conversion.
  • Illiquidity and concentrated ownership: avg_volume_2w = 3,818 shares and PAN owns 77.9%, which may limit free-float liquidity and minority protections.
  • Model uncertainty: blended intrinsic value carries low confidence and the DCF leg is sensitive to WACC (10.0%) and terminal growth (4.0%); TV is 57.09% of value, increasing valuation sensitivity.

Sector Context

LAF sits in Vietnam's food manufacturing sector (ICB: Sản xuất thực phẩm) where multiples are compressed versus global peers given domestic competition and input-cost volatility. The sector median implied upside in our peer set is 12.0% — similar to LAF's 12.1% — but peer dispersion is wide with some high-conviction stories at materially higher implied upside. Vietnamese accounting standards (VAS) can mask cash conversion differences versus IFRS peers; LAF's very low earnings quality score suggests particular caution when reading reported profit. For banks and large corporates, SBV credit growth quotas and SOE payout mandates matter; for food manufacturers like LAF, exposures to commodity price cycles, inventory valuation methods under VAS, and the use of intra-group related-party transactions with controlling shareholders (PAN) are common sector governance risks. Foreign ownership room appears limited: foreign_room ~7,341,834 shares of the issued base, which is relevant for potential demand from foreign funds but constrained by low liquidity.

Risk Factors

  • Earnings manipulation risk: Beneish M-Score -0.3787 exceeds the usual -1.78 threshold and the company sits in the 91st percentile vs peers.
  • Very poor earnings quality: score 10.1/100 with cash conversion and receivables scores at 0.0/100, raising questions on reported net profit sustainability.
  • Concentrated ownership: PAN holds 77.9% which can stabilize strategy but risks minority shareholder outcomes and related-party transactions.
  • Liquidity risk: avg_volume_2w = 3,818 shares and low free float limit marketability and increase execution cost for large orders.
  • Balance sheet leverage: Debt/Equity 1.2669 indicates meaningful leverage which, combined with an Altman Z-Score in the grey zone, raises solvency sensitivity to a downturn.
  • Valuation sensitivity: the DCF TV represents 57.09% of value and the model uses WACC 10.0% and terminal g 4.0%; small changes can swing intrinsic value materially.
  • Governance/related-party exposure: high ownership by a single group increases the probability of intra-group arrangements that may not be at arm's length.

Catalysts

  • Quarterly earnings that materially improve cash conversion or operating cash flow could reduce forensic concerns and lift confidence.
  • A reduction in leverage or transparent deleveraging plan would improve Altman Z-Score and credit profile.
  • Improved liquidity or a secondary sale that increases free float would reduce price volatility and potentially attract more institutional demand.
  • Independent auditor confirmations or enhanced disclosures addressing the Beneish/earnings-quality flags.

Forensic Assessment

Forensic indicators are the primary concern. The Beneish M-Score (-0.3787) is above the usual manipulation threshold and sits in a high-risk percentile; the model flags 'manipulation_risk' and 'low_earnings_quality' explicitly. The earnings quality score of 10.1/100 with zero cash-conversion and receivables scores suggests reported profits are weakly supported by cash flows. The Altman Z-Score places LAF in a grey zone for bankruptcy risk. While the controlling shareholder (PAN, 77.9%) may provide strategic stability, it also concentrates decision-making and raises related-party transaction risk. Overall, forensic risk is elevated and is the single largest deterrent to a higher conviction valuation.

Track Record

Model track record spans 12 years with a hit rate of 54.5% (years: 12) — modest historical directional accuracy. Average realized upside in prior calls is 122.5%, but that metric is skewed by outliers and does not mitigate current low model confidence. Given the modest hit rate and the current model's 'low' confidence calibration, investors should treat the intrinsic estimate as directional rather than definitive.

Written by a language model on 2026-08-10 from this page’s own model outputs and financial statements, and may quote figures from that date. Descriptive analysis, not investment advice — no buy, sell or hold recommendation is given or implied.

See the statements behind the number

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

See the 2015-present track record

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor

See the earnings-quality breakdown

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

Financial Forensics

Beneish M-Score · 2025

High Risk
M -0.43 · 91th pctile vs peers
YoY ▲ +2.61
Conservative vs VN peersAggressive
Compare across the whole market

Ranked vs Vietnamese peers. The −1.78 Beneish cutoff is US-calibrated; ~28% of VN stocks exceed it.

DSRI
1.530
GMI
1.436
AQI
0.815
SGI
1.322
DEPI
1.165
SGAI
0.609
TATA
0.272
LVGI
1.745

Read the forensic analysis

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor

See the Piotroski, Altman and DuPont detail

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

Key Ratios

Fiscal year 2025
7.97P/E
P/B1.18
P/S0.49
ROE15.9%
ROA8.4%
EPS2634.95
BVPS16926.16
Gross Margin15.4%
Net Margin6.5%
D/E1.27
Current Ratio1.37
Rev Growth32.9%
Profit Growth-10.7%
EV/EBITDA7.33
Div Yield7.5%

Company Overview

Issued Shares
15.2M
Charter Capital
152.3B VND
Sector (ICB L2)
Thực phẩm và đồ uống
Industry (ICB L3)
Sản xuất thực phẩm
Sub-industry
Thực phẩm
Company Type
CT

See who owns this company, and what else they own

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor
Computed 28/08/2026
Methodology & Disclosure

vnvalue is a methodology engine — not an advisor. Every number is the deterministic output of a published formula applied to public financial data. Nothing on this page constitutes investment, financial, legal, or tax advice, nor a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security.

All data, models, and outputs are provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions. Past performance and historical valuations are not indicative of future results.

By using vnvalue you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Full disclaimer →