Back to Dashboard

MTG

Utilities

Công ty Cổ phần MT Gas

Điện, nước & xăng dầu khí đốtNước & Khí đốtCT
10.000
VND · Last close
Valuation Verdict
Undervalued
Very Low
+16.2%
-120%Fair Value+120%
Current
10.000
Intrinsic Value
11.619
ModelDDM 3STAGE

See how this valuation was built

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

See how the value moves with WACC and growth

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor
Research Note

MTG: Small-cap gas distributor with stretched earnings quality and limited liquidity

Intrinsic value VND 11,619 vs market price VND 10,000 — implied upside 16.2% (model confidence: very_low).

Business Overview

Công ty Cổ phần MT Gas (MTG) is a small-cap utility operating in the water & gas segment on UPCOM with 10.45 million shares outstanding. The company is concentrated on downstream gas distribution and related services in Vietnam. Revenue has contracted sharply from VND 695.6 bn in 2023 to VND 225.5 bn in 2025, reflecting either a material business slowdown, asset sales or one-off effects in recent years. Top ownership is concentrated: Công ty Cổ phần Tập đoàn Dầu khí An Pha holds 40.72% and two individuals together control ~44.0%, which gives concentrated control but also potential stability in strategic decisions.

Investment Thesis

MTG's valuation gap to fair value is modestly positive: our three-stage DDM implies VND 11,619 per share, 16.2% above the last match price of VND 10,000. The model inputs assume a cost of equity of 10.7%, a terminal growth of 3.5% and a DPS of VND 500, producing a payout ratio above 100% (119.45%), which flags sustainability concerns. Operating performance is weak: ROE is only 3.5% and net margin 1.9%, while revenue fell YoY by 10.1% and absolute revenue in 2025 was VND 225.5 bn. These numbers imply limited organic growth potential without a clear turnaround plan.

The forensic and liquidity picture undermines confidence in the headline upside. The Beneish M-Score (-1.5328) and an Earnings Quality Score of 10.1/100 point to aggressive accounting and extremely poor cash conversion (cash conversion and receivables are both flagged at 0/100). Trading liquidity is minimal (avg volume 2w = 9 shares) and foreign ownership room is zero, making monetization and incremental foreign demand unlikely. Conversely, the concentrated anchor shareholder (An Pha, 40.72%) and a Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 provide some governance continuity and scope for operational fixes.

Putting these pieces together: the implied 16.2% upside is insufficient to offset the combination of illiquidity, forensic red flags, and very_low model confidence. Any positive re-rating will likely need demonstrable improvements in cash conversion, transparency on accounting, or a catalytic corporate action (asset sale, strategic partner).

Valuation Commentary

Three-stage dividend-discount model calibrated with isotonic mapping to institutional priors; intrinsic value reflects projected DPS and a low terminal growth assumption.

  • DPS used: VND 500 (source: events).
  • Cost of equity (ke): 10.7% composed of rf 4.36%, ERP 4.38%, CRP 2.75%, beta 0.82.
  • Base growth/terminal g: 3.5% (effective floor also 3.5%).
  • High payout ratio: 119.45% which pressures sustainability assumptions.
  • Model calibration lowered raw IV (raw VND 7,185.9) to calibrated IV VND 11,619 due to isotonic adjustment and prior confidence settings.

The model-implied upside of 16.2% indicates moderate potential but the confidence is very_low, largely due to illiquidity and weak earnings quality. The payout assumption (DPS VND 500) and the >100% payout ratio require either capital returns from non-operating sources or accounting clarity; if DPS proves unsustainable the intrinsic value would fall materially. We place low conviction on the IV without demonstrable improvements in cash generation or forensic remediation.

Bull vs Bear

Bull Case
  • Calibrated DDM implies VND 11,619 per share (16.2% upside) supported by a VND 500 DPS if paid consistently.
  • Anchor shareholder (An Pha) with 40.72% could stabilize strategy and push for operational turnaround or recapitalization.
  • Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 suggests some neutral operational footing that management could leverage into recovery.
Bear Case
  • Forensic red flags: Beneish M-Score -1.5328 (79th percentile) and Earnings Quality Score 10.1/100 indicate aggressive accounting and near-zero cash conversion, threatening earnings sustainability.
  • Liquidity is negligible (avg 2-week volume = 9 shares) and foreign_room = 0.0, constraining marketability and any rerating by international investors.
  • Revenue collapsed to VND 225.5 bn in 2025 from VND 695.6 bn in 2023 and net profit volatile (VND 4.4 bn in 2025), increasing execution risk and making dividend-funded valuation assumptions precarious.

Sector Context

MTG sits in the Vietnam water & gas utility segment where state-related counterparties, regulated tariffs and distribution concessions shape earnings. Peers show a wide dispersion in implied upside (sector median upside 16.6%). Larger listed peers benefit from better liquidity, clearer capex plans and higher transparency; MTG’s UPCOM listing and micro-cap status place it at the market’s tail for both information flow and liquidity. Regulatory context: utilities can be affected by SBV credit quotas for their industrial customers and by periodic tariff adjustments; for gas distributors, access to pipeline capacity and long-term offtake contracts matter. Also note VAS accounting differences in provisions and receivables recognition can exaggerate reported profits vs IFRS peers, which is relevant given MTG’s forensic flags.

Risk Factors

  • Aggressive accounting risk: Beneish M-Score (-1.5328) and red flags for manipulation suggest potential restatements or earnings revisions.
  • Very poor earnings quality: Earnings Quality Score 10.1/100 with cash conversion and receivables at 0/100; reported profits may not convert to cash.
  • Liquidity risk: avg volume 2w = 9 shares and UPCOM listing make position sizing and exit difficult.
  • Dividend sustainability: implied payout ratio 119.45% — dividend may rely on one-offs or balance-sheet draws.
  • Concentrated ownership: >85% held by top three shareholders can entrench management decisions and increase minority shareholder governance risk.
  • Market risk: sector cyclicality and regulatory/tariff changes could compress margins; revenue has already declined materially (Revenue YoY -10.1%).

Catalysts

  • Publication of audited cash-flow statements or an independent forensic review that improves confidence in earnings quality.
  • A confirmed and sustainable DPS payment (VND 500) accompanied by clear funding sources.
  • Operational announcements: new distribution contracts, recontracting of offtake or asset sales that restore revenue visibility.
  • Change in listing status or a liquidity-enhancing transaction (block sale, strategic investor) that opens foreign room.

Forensic Assessment

Material forensic concerns are the primary constraint on MTG’s investment case. The Beneish M-Score of -1.5328 (79th percentile) flags a heightened risk of earnings manipulation relative to peers, and the Earnings Quality Score of 10.1/100 — with cash conversion and receivables at 0/100 — indicates reported earnings are poorly supported by cash flows. Altman Z-Score of 2.30 sits in the grey zone, adding bankruptcy caution. Positive signals are limited: a Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 and a dominant institutional shareholder provide some governance stability, but these do not mitigate the core accounting and cash-flow concerns. Overall forensic risk is moderate-to-high and materially reduces model confidence.

Track Record

The model has a mixed 12-year track record with a hit rate of 54.5% for directional calls and an average realized return of -25.0% across the sample, indicating a tendency toward over-optimism historically. Use prior performance cautiously: the modest hit rate and negative long-run average outcome lower our operational confidence in the model’s calibrated outputs for this micro-cap UPCOM name.

Written by a language model on 2026-08-10 from this page’s own model outputs and financial statements, and may quote figures from that date. Descriptive analysis, not investment advice — no buy, sell or hold recommendation is given or implied.

See the statements behind the number

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

See the 2015-present track record

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor

See the earnings-quality breakdown

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

Financial Forensics

Beneish M-Score · 2025

Moderate
M -1.53 · 79th pctile vs peers
YoY ▲ +3.11
Conservative vs VN peersAggressive
Compare across the whole market

Ranked vs Vietnamese peers. The −1.78 Beneish cutoff is US-calibrated; ~28% of VN stocks exceed it.

DSRI
2.007
GMI
0.522
AQI
1.692
SGI
0.356
DEPI
0.844
SGAI
2.971
TATA
0.173
LVGI
0.641

Read the forensic analysis

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor

See the Piotroski, Altman and DuPont detail

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

Key Ratios

Fiscal year 2025
23.89P/E
P/B0.87
P/S0.46
ROE3.5%
ROA2.0%
EPS418.60
BVPS11525.89
Gross Margin10.1%
Net Margin1.9%
D/E0.51
Current Ratio1.74
EV/EBITDA13.81
Div Yield5.0%

Company Overview

Issued Shares
10.4M
Charter Capital
104.5B VND
Sector (ICB L2)
Điện, nước & xăng dầu khí đốt
Industry (ICB L3)
Nước & Khí đốt
Sub-industry
Phân phối xăng dầu & khí đốt
Company Type
CT

See who owns this company, and what else they own

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor
Computed 28/08/2026
Methodology & Disclosure

vnvalue is a methodology engine — not an advisor. Every number is the deterministic output of a published formula applied to public financial data. Nothing on this page constitutes investment, financial, legal, or tax advice, nor a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security.

All data, models, and outputs are provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions. Past performance and historical valuations are not indicative of future results.

By using vnvalue you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Full disclaimer →