Back to Dashboard

NLG

Công ty Cổ phần Đầu tư Nam Long

Real EstateBất động sảnCT
21.400
VND · Close 15 Oct 2026

Valuation Verdict

ModelRNAV + DCF Blend
ConfidenceLow
Undervalued
+66.6%Model value vs price
−50%Fair Value+100%+500%

RNAV + DCF Blend values the company at 35.642 VND a share from its published filings. The gap above is how far the latest close sits from that estimate. It measures the model's assumptions against the price: a large gap usually means the model and the market disagree about growth or risk.

Current
21.400
Intrinsic Value
35.642

Backtest-calibrated reading

+5.0%Median 12-month return vs sector

In the 2015–2024 backtest, Real Estate stocks with a model gap of this size returned a median of +5.0% against their sector over the following 12 months. The calibration keeps the model's ranking and converts the size of the gap into what that rank has earned historically.

Calibrated range, Real Estate
−2.6%+12.9%

See how this valuation was built

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

See how the value moves with WACC and growth

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor
Research Note

NLG: blended DCF/RNAV implies limited upside; execution and forensic risks constrain conviction

Intrinsic value VND 22,995 vs market VND 21,900 implies +5.0% upside with low confidence

Business Overview

Công ty Cổ phần Đầu tư Nam Long (NLG) is a listed residential real-estate developer on HOSE focused on mid-market housing projects and township developments in southern Vietnam. The business mixes landbank ownership, active development and project sales, and recurring income from completed assets. As of the latest data the company has 485,097,383 shares outstanding and a material net cash position reported in the DCF inputs (net_debt = -VND 1,292.7 bn). NLG operates in the Vietnamese property sector where VAS accounting (capitalisation of land costs, timing of revenue recognition) and land-use-rights revaluations materially affect reported earnings and book value.

Investment Thesis

1) Valuation: Our blended intrinsic value (blend of 60% DCF and 40% RNAV) produces VND 22,995 per share versus the matched price of VND 21,900, implying only +5.0% upside. The DCF component is sensitive to the 10.0% WACC and terminal growth of 3.5%, while RNAV revaluation assumptions materially lift the RNAV leg (rnav_intrinsic = VND 32,628; rnav_revaluation_factor = 1.5).

2) Financial profile: NLG generates mid-single-digit returns on equity (ROE 6.3%) and ROA 2.5%, with EBIT margin of 18.9% and net margin of 16.8%. The company trades at P/E 16.0 and P/B 0.84, which together suggest a modest valuation premium relative to replacement-value dynamics but limited earnings power. Recent revenue was volatile: VND 7,196.1 bn in 2024 down to VND 5,645.1 bn in 2025, while net profit recovered to VND 701.4 bn in 2025.

3) Balance-sheet and liquidity: Reported Debt/Equity is 0.792 and model inputs use a debt/equity mix (de = 0.79) consistent with meaningful leverage. The DCF model shows a net cash position (net_debt = -VND 1,292.7 bn) which helps valuation, but the business remains exposed to project funding cycles, SBV credit growth quotas and interest-rate moves that could reduce developer liquidity or slow presales.

4) Execution & forensic concerns: Forensic flags are meaningful. Beneish M-Score is -1.6223 (above the -1.78 threshold), Altman Z-Score 1.88 sits in a grey zone for distress, and an Earnings Quality score of 45.3/100 signals mediocre earnings quality. These factors reduce confidence in reported earnings and suggest a need to discount upside. Given the low model confidence and these red flags, the small implied upside is insufficient to compensate for execution and accounting risks.

Valuation Commentary

Blended valuation: 60% DCF (levered) and 40% RNAV with revaluation uplift; inputs use a 10.0% WACC and 3.5% terminal growth.

  • Base free cash flow used: VND 1,156,504,254,478 (base_cf) and projected long-term growth of 3.66% (growth_rate) with floor of 3.5%.
  • WACC components: WACC 10.0%, ke 11.49%, kd after-tax 5.16%, debt weight 51.95%, equity weight 48.05%.
  • RNAV leg: rnav_intrinsic VND 32,628 per share with rnav_revaluation_factor 1.5 and rnav_effective_factor 1.25.
  • Leverage and net cash: model reports net_debt = -VND 1,292.7 bn which supports valuation; tv_pct (terminal value share) = 73.75% of enterprise value.
  • Confidence & calibration: model raw_intrinsic_value VND 37,461.9 scaled to final intrinsic VND 22,995 using isotonic calibration; overall model confidence flagged as low and sanity_flags include mediocre_earnings_quality and manipulation_risk.

The blended intrinsic VND 22,995 is only 5.0% above the current price, and the model confidence is low. That narrow margin offers limited buffer against execution, market or forensic downside. Given the forensic flags and volatile recent revenue, conviction in the intrinsic estimate is limited and sensitivity to growth/WACC assumptions is high.

Bull vs Bear

Bull Case
  • Blended valuation benefits from a strong RNAV leg: rnav_intrinsic VND 32,628 and rnav_revaluation_factor 1.5 provide upside if landbank values re-rate.
  • Net cash reported in model inputs (net_debt = -VND 1,292.7 bn) supports balance-sheet resilience and reduces refinancing risk during downturns.
  • Margins are healthy on current operations: gross margin 41.8% and EBIT margin 18.9% support cash generation if project sales remain steady.
Bear Case
  • Forensic and quality concerns: Beneish M-Score -1.6223 (above manipulation threshold -1.78) and Altman Z-Score 1.88 indicate elevated accounting and distress risk.
  • Low earnings quality (45.3/100) and a sanity flag 'manipulation_risk' reduce confidence in reported profits and forward guidance.
  • Limited valuation buffer: implied upside only +5.0% with model confidence flagged as low; small downside from execution slippage or re-pricing of RNAV would eliminate potential upside.

Sector Context

Vietnam real estate remains sensitive to monetary policy, SBV credit flow controls for developers, and regulatory approvals for land-use rights. VAS accounting practices can obscure economic profitability because developers often capitalise land and defer revenue recognition until handover; this increases the importance of RNAV-style valuations for Vietnamese developers. Peers' median implied upside is +5.0%, placing NLG in line with sector mid-pack. The peer set shows a mix of low- to medium-confidence valuations: a few names show double-digit upside (e.g., NRC +12.9%, AGG +12.2%), but many carry much lower or negative upside with very low model confidence.

Risk Factors

  • Forensic/accounting risk: Beneish M-Score = -1.6223 (in the 76th percentile vs peers) and sanity_flags include 'manipulation_risk', increasing the chance that reported earnings or assets may be aggressive.
  • Distress signal: Altman Z-Score 1.88 places the company in a grey zone for bankruptcy risk and indicates vulnerability if a macro slowdown reduces presales.
  • Revenue volatility: Revenue fell from VND 7,196.1 bn in 2024 to VND 5,645.1 bn in 2025, highlighting cyclical presale and handover timing risk.
  • Model sensitivity: Blended valuation depends heavily on RNAV revaluation assumptions (rnav_revaluation_factor 1.5) and a 10.0% WACC; small changes to these inputs materially alter intrinsic value.
  • Concentration and liquidity: Top individual shareholder holds 7.86% and largest institutional holders together hold meaningful stakes; foreign_room remains limited (foreign_room = 68,535,916.5429124 shares), which could restrict offshore flows.
  • Regulatory and funding: SBV credit quotas or tighter lending to developers can impair presales and increase financing costs despite the model reporting net cash.

Catalysts

  • Quarterly/annual results showing sustained presale momentum or higher-than-expected handovers that translate to repeatable cash flows and validate the RNAV uplift.
  • Landbank revaluation, joint-venture announcements or asset disposals that crystallise RNAV upside and improve transparency.
  • Reduction in forensic concerns: audited disclosures or independent assurance addressing accounting items that lower the Beneish M-Score and raise earnings quality.

Forensic Assessment

Forensic signals are the primary concern. Beneish M-Score is -1.6223, which is above the commonly-used manipulation threshold of -1.78 and places NLG in the 76th percentile versus peers. The Altman Z-Score of 1.88 sits in a grey zone for bankruptcy risk. Earnings Quality is low at 45.3/100, though receivables management scores well per the positive_signals. Overall, these flags justify discounting reported profits and applying low confidence to model outputs; close review of revenue recognition, capitalised costs and related-party transactions is warranted.

Track Record

The model's historical track record spans 12 years with a hit rate of 54.5% and an average realized upside of -8.8% over that period. This middling hit rate and negative average outcome temper confidence in the model's forward signal, consistent with the current 'low' confidence calibration.

Written by a language model on 2026-10-10 from this page’s own model outputs and financial statements, and may quote figures from that date. Descriptive analysis, not investment advice — no buy, sell or hold recommendation is given or implied.

See the statements behind the number

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

See the 2015-present track record

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor

See the earnings-quality breakdown

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

Financial Forensics

Beneish M-Score · 2025

75th–90th
M −1.62 · 77th pctile vs VN companies
YoY ▲ +0.25
Conservative vs VN peersAggressive
Compare across the whole market

Ranked vs Vietnamese peers. The −1.78 Beneish cutoff is US-calibrated; ~28% of VN stocks exceed it.

DSRI
0.862
GMI
1.017
AQI
3.134
SGI
0.784
DEPI
0.801
SGAI
1.182
TATA
0.068
LVGI
0.879

See the Piotroski, Altman and DuPont detail

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

Key Ratios

Fiscal year 2025
—P/E
P/B
—
P/S
—
ROE
6.3%
ROA
2.5%
EPS
1.446
BVPS
26.102
Gross Margin
41.8%
Net Margin
16.8%
D/E
—
Current Ratio
2.98
Rev Growth
−21.6%
Profit Growth
+35.4%
EV/EBITDA
—
Div Yield
2.3%

Company Overview

Issued Shares
485M
Charter Capital
4,851B VND
Sector (ICB L2)
Bất động sản
Industry (ICB L3)
Bất động sản
Sub-industry
Bất động sản
Company Type
CT

See who owns this company, and what else they own

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor
Computed 14/10/2026
Methodology & Disclosure

vnvalue is a methodology engine — not an advisor. Every number is the deterministic output of a published formula applied to public financial data. Nothing on this page constitutes investment, financial, legal, or tax advice, nor a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security.

All data, models, and outputs are provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions. Past performance and historical valuations are not indicative of future results.

By using vnvalue you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Full disclaimer →