
TED
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — TED
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
The Beneish M-Score of -2.9675 indicates that TED is not likely to be manipulating earnings, as it falls well below the manipulation threshold of -1.78. However, the high SGI of 1.3185 suggests aggressive revenue growth that may not be sustainable, raising concerns about future earnings quality.
- SGI of 1.3185 indicates aggressive revenue growth, which may not be sustainable.
- Earnings Quality Score of 74.1/100 is decent, but the eq_revenue score of 0.0/100 raises concerns about revenue recognition practices.
- Cash conversion metrics are strong with an eq_cash_conv score of 100.0/100, indicating effective cash generation from earnings.
- Low DSRI of 0.9595 suggests that inventory levels are well managed relative to sales.
The top shareholders include a significant institutional investor (35.0%) and a large individual investor (30.1%), which may provide stability. However, the concentration of ownership raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest and governance issues.
Monitor revenue growth closely due to the elevated SGI, and consider further analysis of revenue recognition practices. Engage with management to clarify strategies for sustaining growth while maintaining earnings quality.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for TED — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate