VNVALUEVNVALUE
Updated weekly
Back to Dashboard
Construction sector

UMC

Construction
Công ty Cổ phần Công trình đô thị Nam Định
Xây dựng và Vật liệuCT
8.700
VND · Last close
Valuation Verdict
Undervalued
Low
-120%Fair Value+120%
Intrinsic Value
15.695
Current
8.700
Gap
+80.4%
ModelEV EBITDA DCF BLEND

Valuation Breakdown

CTXây dựng và Vật liệuConstruction
Classified as construction because ICB sector "Xây dựng và Vật liệu" maps to the construction group
ModelEV/EBITDA + DCF Blend
Intrinsic = 50% x EV/EBITDA Value + 50% x DCF Value

Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.

1
Weighted Avg Cost of Capital
Risk-Free (Rf)
4.50%
+
Betasector default
1.100
x
ERP
4.25%
+
CRP
2.75%
=
Cost of Equity (Ke)
12.20%
Ke
12.20%
x
E/(D+E)
80.50%
+
Kd(1-t)
6.16%
x
D/(D+E)
19.50%
=
WACC
11.02%
2
Growth Estimate
fundamental firm blend3.00%
Growth decays 12%/yr toward terminal
3
Model Inputs
4
Valuation
50%EV/EBITDA Value
10.754
50%DCF Value
20.636
Blended Intrinsic
15.695
Value Decomposition
39%
61%
Explicit period (39%)Terminal value (61%)

Valuation Track Record

Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — UMC

Earnings Quality

Fiscal year 2024

47
Weak
Accrual Quality
58
Cash Conversion
0
Receivables
100
Margin Stability
49
Revenue Quality
37

Financial Forensics

Beneish M-Score · 2020

-0.18
High Risk
DSRI
0.835
GMI
1.009
AQI
6.609
SGI
0.990
DEPI
1.293
SGAI
0.965
TATA
0.020
LVGI
0.840

UMC exhibits a Beneish M-Score of -0.1822, indicating a low likelihood of earnings manipulation, as it is well above the threshold of -1.78. However, the earnings quality metrics reveal significant concerns, particularly in cash conversion and revenue recognition, which could signal underlying operational issues.

Red Flags
  • Earnings Quality Score of 63.2/100 indicates moderate quality, especially concerning cash conversion at 35.3/100, suggesting potential liquidity issues.
  • Revenue quality score of 0.0/100 raises concerns about the reliability of reported revenues, which could indicate aggressive accounting practices.
Positive Signals
  • Beneish M-Score of -0.1822 suggests a low likelihood of earnings manipulation, reflecting a potentially stable earnings reporting environment.
  • Strong receivables quality score of 100.0/100 indicates effective management of receivables, which is a positive sign for cash flow management.
Ownership Risk

The majority ownership by the state (51.0%) may provide stability but also raises concerns about potential political influence and lack of shareholder activism. The concentration of ownership among a few individuals could limit minority shareholder protections.

Recommendation

Investors should closely monitor UMC's cash conversion and revenue recognition practices, as these are critical areas of concern. It is advisable to conduct further due diligence on operational performance and governance structures before making investment decisions.

Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.

Quantitative Scores

F-Score
4/9
Neutral
Z-Score
4.32
Safe Zone
Sharpe
0.00
Negative
Composite
52
Fair
Price Risk
Momentum
+0.0%
Volatility
0.1%
Max Drawdown
0.0%

Key Ratios

Fiscal year 2024
9.08P/E
P/B0.78
P/S0.24
ROE8.2%
ROA6.8%
EPS1216.06
BVPS11185.04
Gross Margin15.5%
Net Margin3.4%
D/E0.24
Current Ratio3.74
Rev Growth10.8%
Profit Growth17.0%
EV/EBITDA1.41
Div Yield8.1%

Company Overview

Issued Shares
1.8M
Charter Capital
18.4B VND
Sector (ICB L2)
Xây dựng và Vật liệu
Industry (ICB L3)
Xây dựng và Vật liệu
Sub-industry
Xây dựng
Company Type
CT

// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK

> mapping common ownership for UMC — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate

Shareholders
Ủy Ban Nhân Dân Tỉnh Nam Định
State
51.0%
939.297
Đinh Thị Hằng
Indiv
8.4%
155.454
Đinh Văn Hóa
Indiv
7.4%
135.800
Đỗ Minh Dũng
Indiv
2.4%
44.300
Trần Xuân Sánh
Indiv
2.0%
36.766
Phạm Thị Hải Quỳnh
Indiv
1.1%
20.500
Nguyễn Ngọc Hưng
Indiv
1.1%
20.200
Nguyễn Văn Toản
Indiv
1.1%
19.800
Phạm Thái Sơn
Indiv
0.9%
16.200
Lê Chí Hiền
Indiv
0.9%
16.200
Trần Việt Dũng
Indiv
0.8%
15.500
Trần Thị Trung Hậu
Indiv
0.3%
6.000
Đặng Thị Thu
Indiv
0.3%
5.300
nguyen-thu-hien
Indiv
0.3%
5.200
Board & Management
Đinh Thị Hằng8.4%
Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị
Đỗ Minh Dũng2.4%
Chủ tịch Hội đồng Quản trị
Phạm Thị Hải Quỳnh1.1%
Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị/Kế toán trưởng
Phạm Thái Sơn0.9%
Giám đốc/Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị
Lê Chí Hiền0.9%
Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị/Phó Giám đốc
Trần Việt Dũng0.8%
Trưởng Ban kiểm soát
Trần Thị Trung Hậu0.3%
Thành viên Ban kiểm soát
Đặng Thị Thu0.3%
Người phụ trách quản trị công ty/Phụ trách Công bố thông tin
Nguyễn Thu Hiền0.3%
Thành viên Ban kiểm soát
Computed 12/04/2026
Methodology & Disclosure

vnvalue is a methodology engine — not an advisor. Every number is the deterministic output of a published formula applied to public financial data. Nothing on this page constitutes investment, financial, legal, or tax advice, nor a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security.

All data, models, and outputs are provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions. Past performance and historical valuations are not indicative of future results.

By using vnvalue you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Full disclaimer →