Back to Dashboard

DCT

Construction

Công ty Cổ phần Tấm lợp Vật liệu Xây dựng Đồng Nai

Xây dựng và Vật liệuCT
400
VND · Last close
Valuation Verdict
Overvalued
Low
-34.6%
-120%Fair Value+120%
Current
400
Intrinsic Value
262
ModelEV EBITDA MIDCYCLE

See how this valuation was built

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

See how the value moves with WACC and growth

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor
Research Note

DCT: Distressed roofing-materials specialist; balance-sheet shortfalls drive valuation gap

Intrinsic value VND 262 vs market VND 400 — implied downside -34.6% (model confidence: low).

Business Overview

Công ty Cổ phần Tấm lợp Vật liệu Xây dựng Đồng Nai (DCT) is a UPCOM-listed manufacturer of roofing and construction materials operating in Vietnam's building-materials segment. The company has 27,223,647 shares outstanding and derives revenue from sale of roofing products and related construction-materials services, reporting revenue of VND 249.9 bn in 2025 after a prior-year dip.

Investment Thesis

DCT's current price implies significant distress: our EV/EBITDA mid-cycle model produces an intrinsic value of VND 262 per share (implied downside -34.6% to the market price of VND 400) and carries a low confidence calibration. Key determinants are a small mid-cycle EBITDA base (mid-cycle EBITDA reported at VND 19.6 bn) and meaningful net debt (model input net debt VND 452.3 bn), which combine with negative equity value flags to compress implied valuation multiples. Operationally, revenue recovered to VND 249.9 bn in 2025 but the company remains loss-making (net profit in 2025: negative VND 62.0 bn) and shows negative margins (net margin -24.8%, EBIT margin -11.6%), limiting near-term earnings recovery prospects.

On the ownership side, concentration is material: the largest shareholder holds 21.01% and the top five together control a majority stake, which raises governance and liquidity considerations for minority investors. Credit and balance-sheet repair would be the main route to any meaningful re-rating; absent a clear deleveraging plan or equity recap, the downside implied by our model is credible. That said, reported revenue growth in 2025 (VND 249.9 bn, up from VND 94.9 bn in 2024) shows potential commercial recovery, so upside remains conditional on sustained margin and cash-flow improvement.

Valuation Commentary

EV/EBITDA mid-cycle: we apply a mid-cycle EBITDA to a fair EV/EBITDA multiple, subtract net debt and divide by shares outstanding to get intrinsic value per share.

  • Mid-cycle EBITDA: VND 19.6 bn
  • Fair EV/EBITDA multiple: 15.79x
  • Net debt: VND 452.3 bn
  • Distressed adjustment: model flagged negative equity value and used isotonic recalibration

The model produces an intrinsic value of VND 262 implying -34.6% from the market price; confidence is low due to distressed inputs (negative equity) and limited, volatile earnings. We place limited weight on the precise point estimate — the direction (material downside under current structure) is the main signal.

Bull vs Bear

Bull Case
  • Revenue recovery to VND 249.9 bn in 2025 (from VND 94.9 bn in 2024) shows the business can win back sales after a downturn.
  • Concentrated institutional stake (Tổng Công ty Xi măng Việt Nam 12.5%) could support operational stability or preferential procurement.
  • Low absolute EV/EBITDA multiple (model-derived fair multiple 15.79x) leaves theoretical upside if EBITDA recovers materially and net debt is reduced.
Bear Case
  • Negative equity and model 'distressed' flag: balance-sheet distress is real (model net debt VND 452.3 bn and negative BVPS of VND -20,512.8), constraining refinancing options.
  • Persistent losses: net profit was negative VND 62.0 bn in 2025 and margins remain deeply negative (net margin -24.8%, EBIT margin -11.6%).
  • Illiquidity and penny-stock characteristics (average daily volume over 2 weeks 5,978 shares) increase execution risk for large investors and amplify volatility.
  • Earnings quality is mediocre (score 48.4/100) and forensic flags include 'mediocre_earnings_quality' and 'negative_equity', reducing confidence in reported profits.

Sector Context

DCT sits in the 'Xây dựng và Vật liệu' segment where peers number 420 in our dataset; the sector median implied upside is +9.6%, reflecting a broad dispersion across materials companies. Top peers in our coverage show positive upside scenarios (e.g., BCR +39.2%), but these names typically have stronger balance sheets or higher-quality earnings. For Vietnamese-listed materials firms, VAS accounting and the treatment of land-use rights, inventories and state-related receivables can materially affect reported equity and leverage — items to watch closely for DCT. Regulatory context (SBV credit guidance, SOE dividend/payout expectations for state shareholders such as Tổng Công ty Xi măng Việt Nam) can influence access to capital and intra-group support for SOE-aligned holders.

Risk Factors

  • Balance-sheet risk: negative reported equity and model-flagged negative_equity raise refinancing and covenants risk.
  • Liquidity/market risk: UPCOM listing, penny-stock profile and avg volume 2w of 5,978 shares make large transactions difficult without market impact.
  • Earnings volatility: net margin -24.8% and recurring losses (net profit -VND 62.0 bn in 2025) imply recovery is not yet sustainable.
  • Concentrated ownership: top shareholder holds 21.01%; related-party decisions or block trades could move the stock materially.
  • Accounting and earnings-quality risk: earnings_quality score 48.4/100 and 'mediocre_earnings_quality' model flag suggest lower transparency or recurring adjustments.
  • Refinancing and interest-cost risk: material net debt (VND 452.3 bn) versus limited cash-flow generation increases default risk under adverse market conditions.

Catalysts

  • Public disclosure of a credible deleveraging plan or equity injection that materially reduces net debt.
  • Sustained return to positive operating margins and EBITDA growth for 2-3 consecutive quarters.
  • An industrial or strategic investor acquiring a material stake (block transaction) to provide operational or financing support.

Forensic Assessment

The Beneish M-Score is not available, but model sanity flags include 'penny_stock', 'illiquid', 'mediocre_earnings_quality' and 'negative_equity'. Earnings-quality at 48.4/100 is middling and supports caution; there are no explicit forensic red flags in the input beyond these model sanity flags. Given negative BVPS (VND -20,512.8) and the 'negative_equity' flag, the principal forensic concern is balance-sheet erosion rather than clear evidence of manipulation.

Track Record

Our model's historical track record spans 12 years with a hit rate of 54.5% (directional calls matched next-year price direction just over half the time). Average historic upside when the model was correct is large (avg upside 215.9%), but the hit rate indicates moderate reliability — use model output as one input among qualitative balance-sheet and industry analysis rather than a standalone signal.

Written by a language model on 2026-08-10 from this page’s own model outputs and financial statements, and may quote figures from that date. Descriptive analysis, not investment advice — no buy, sell or hold recommendation is given or implied.

See the statements behind the number

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

See the 2015-present track record

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor

See the earnings-quality breakdown

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

Financial Forensics

Beneish M-Score · 2025

Low Risk
M -1.87 · 70th pctile vs peers
YoY ▲ +1.27
Conservative vs VN peersAggressive
Compare across the whole market

Ranked vs Vietnamese peers. The −1.78 Beneish cutoff is US-calibrated; ~28% of VN stocks exceed it.

DSRI
0.438
GMI
1.020
AQI
0.970
SGI
2.634
DEPI
0.930
SGAI
0.458
TATA
-0.086
LVGI
1.027

See the Piotroski, Altman and DuPont detail

A free account opens the full working: every step of the calculation, the statements it reads and the scores derived from them.

Create a free account

Free, and it takes one click with Google.

Key Ratios

Fiscal year 2025
-0.18P/E
P/B0.00
P/S0.04
ROE11.8%
ROA-8.0%
EPS-2278.16
BVPS-20512.82
Gross Margin-8.7%
Net Margin-24.8%
D/E-2.43
Current Ratio0.32
Rev Growth163.4%
Profit Growth22.8%
EV/EBITDA156.20
Div Yield0.0%

Company Overview

Issued Shares
27.2M
Charter Capital
272.2B VND
Sector (ICB L2)
Xây dựng và Vật liệu
Industry (ICB L3)
Xây dựng và Vật liệu
Sub-industry
Vật liệu xây dựng & Nội thất
Company Type
CT

See who owns this company, and what else they own

Investor opens the parts that take the most work to produce: the year-by-year track record, the forensic analysis and the ownership network.

See Investor
Computed 28/08/2026
Methodology & Disclosure

vnvalue is a methodology engine — not an advisor. Every number is the deterministic output of a published formula applied to public financial data. Nothing on this page constitutes investment, financial, legal, or tax advice, nor a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security.

All data, models, and outputs are provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions. Past performance and historical valuations are not indicative of future results.

By using vnvalue you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Full disclaimer →