VIE
Công ty Cổ phần Công nghệ Viễn thông VI TE CO
Calibrated intrinsic value vs last close
Illustrative estimate- Last close (VND)
- 5.800
- Calibrated intrinsic value (VND)
- 5.307
Last close × (1 + calibrated gap / 100)
Earnings-capitalised value
Not available: the company reported a loss last year or its shares have too short a price history.
How it is calculated
- 1Measure the gap
Between the model and the last close.
- 2Check the record2015–2024
What gaps of that size went on to earn over the following year.
- 3Apply to the close
That return is applied to the last close.
Keep in mind
- For illustration only: not a validated forecast.
- No uncertainty range: the estimate is a single figure.
- Older record: it has not been re-measured on the current data.
Why it needs review
- Trading liquidity is below the comparison threshold.
This estimate remains visible for checking its calculation. Its inputs require review before using it in a stock comparison. The model comparison behind this value needs review. The estimate does not remove the data limitations listed above.
Comparison assessed 3 Nov 2026Valid through 25 Nov 2026
- Model reliability
- Low
- Model fitInput stabilityRisk checks
- High requires the model’s diagnostic criteria to be met.
- Probability of outperforming peers
- Not assessed
- A separate peer-outperformance probability is unavailable for this valuation.
These assessments address different questions. Neither establishes that the displayed valuation is correct or guarantees a future return.
Valuation Breakdown
Technology companies combine high growth potential with the risk of overvaluation. This model blends DCF (60% weight, capturing long-duration growth) with a P/E sanity check (40% weight, capping speculative excess). The DCF lets growth fade more slowly than in any other sector, recognizing that tech companies can sustain competitive advantages longer. The P/E component applies a dynamic ceiling: max P/E = min(growth% x 1.5, 30), preventing runaway valuations.
Technical details
Tech firms combine high growth potential with current profitability that peers can benchmark. Pure DCF could overvalue if growth assumptions are too aggressive. The P/E blend acts as a market-calibrated anchor, while the PEG-based cap prevents paying excessive multiples.
DCF: 10-year FCF projection with growth capped at 20%, fading more slowly than in any other sector toward the sector's long-run growth rate. P/E: 5-year median P/E capped at dynamic ceiling (growth x 1.5, max 30). Blend: 60% DCF + 40% P/E.
Technology and IT companies where high growth potential must be balanced against the risk of speculative overvaluation.
We take the model’s gap to the last close, read what gaps of that size went on to earn over the following year in our 2015 to 2024 record, and apply that to the last close.
Last close × (1 + calibrated gap / 100)
DCF Sensitivity
Illustrative calibrated values from the standalone DCF scenarios below, anchored to the same last close. These scenarios leave out the other parts of a blended model and do not reproduce the headline value.
Earnings Quality
Financial Forensics
Ranked vs Vietnamese peers. The −1.78 Beneish cutoff is US-calibrated; ~28% of VN stocks exceed it.
Checks measured on Vietnamese companies · FY2025
- Cash conversion, 3 yearsOperating cash flow / net profit
- 6.8494th pctile
- Receivables outside the trade cyclePrepayments to suppliers, loans and other long-term receivables / total assets
- 0.3%17th pctile
- Accumulated losses / paid-in capitalUndistributed earnings below zero
- 0.09×
- Consecutive years of net lossProfit after tax of the parent
- 0
- Owner's equityWithout the non-controlling interest
- Positive
Percentiles rank each fiscal year against Vietnamese non-financial companies (0 lowest, 100 highest). Over FY2015-2024, low cash conversion and a large share of receivables outside the trade cycle came before more listing trouble and more net losses the next year.
Statutory loss tests (Decree 155/2020/NĐ-CP, Art. 120(1)(e), amended by Decree 245/2025/NĐ-CP): a HOSE or HNX listing is cancelled when the audited annual statements show net losses in each of the latest 3 years, accumulated losses above the paid-in charter capital, or negative owner's equity. Read here from the annual statements as the data vendor publishes them. The company trades on UPCoM, where these tests do not apply.
The company shows a higher-than-peer signal on the Beneish M-Score (M-Score = -1.2119; Vietnam peer percentile = 84th), with the M-Score rising by +0.96 year-over-year. At the same time the Earnings Quality composite is strong (82.4/100) driven by perfect scores on accruals, cash-conversion and receivables metrics, but margin quality is 0/100. The Altman Z-Score is 0.74 (distress zone) while the Piotroski F-Score is 6/9 (neutral fundamentals).
- Beneish M-Score = -1.2119 (measures likelihood of earnings manipulation; -1.78 is the US threshold but the Vietnam peer context matters). The company sits at the 84th percentile among Vietnamese peers (higher = more aggressive versus VN peers) and the M-Score moved +0.96 year-over-year (an upward trajectory).
- Margin quality = 0.0/100 (this Earnings-Quality component measures how sustainable reported margins look; a score of 0 indicates weak margin-quality signals despite other quality measures).
- Altman Z-Score = 0.74 (this measures distance to bankruptcy; 0.74 falls in the distress zone and indicates low buffer versus insolvency benchmarks used by the Altman model).
- Cash conversion (3-year OCF / net profit) = 6.84, ranked at the 94th percentile among Vietnamese non-financial companies (this measures how much profit converts into cash; a high ratio here is a concern because it indicates profits not turning into operating cash).
- M-Score components: GMI = 1.6520 (Gross margin index; >1 suggests deterioration in gross margin), AQI = 1.2487 (asset quality index; >1 indicates rising non-current assets relative to total assets), SGI = 2.8389 (sales growth index; large value shows very high sales growth which can stress controls), LVGI = 1.1573 (leverage growth index; >1 indicates rising leverage). These component values point to pressure on margins, rising asset intensity and leverage alongside strong sales growth.
- Earnings Quality Score = 82.4/100 (a composite measure of accruals, cash conversion, receivables and margins; overall shows reasonably high reported earnings quality despite the margin issue).
- Accruals quality = 100.0/100 and TATA = -0.0411 (total accruals to assets; the perfect accruals-quality score and a small negative TATA indicate low or modest aggregate accruals, which is generally a quality signal about earnings recognition).
- Cash conversion quality = 100.0/100 and Receivables quality = 100.0/100 (these measure operating cash flow conversion and the nature/aging of receivables respectively; both perfect scores and receivables outside the trade cycle = 0.3% of total assets (17th percentile) suggest receivables and cash-flow mechanics look transparent in the filings).
- SGAI = 0.3901 (sales, general & administrative expense growth index; a value below 1 indicates SG&A is not growing faster than sales, which can be a sign of operational efficiency or limited discretionary spend growth).
- Piotroski F-Score = 6/9 (a middling-to-strong score measuring profitability, leverage/liquidity and operating efficiency; indicates neutral-to-sound fundamental signals in several accounting ratios).
- Statutory listing-risk context: although some statutory loss tests were listed for Vietnamese disclosures, this company trades on UPCoM where the HOSE/HNX de-listing rule referenced does not apply (a statement of the listing fact, not a judgment).
Ownership is concentrated: the top five individual shareholders together hold 70.9% (Đỗ Nam Anh 18.8%, Nguyễn Văn Đồng 15.8%, Đinh Thị Hương Loan 14.6%, Nguyễn Thị Hồng Thái 12.5%, Ngô Quang Vinh 9.2%). Director-deal disclosures show 2 sale registrations (one registrant; 1,531,231 shares) and 5 purchase registrations (5 registrants; 475,000 shares, one without volume) filed between 2025-10-30 and 2026-10-30 — these are registered intentions reported to the exchange, not executed trades.
- Compare the 2025 consolidated statement of cash flows (operating cash flow) with the parent net profit line and the cash-conversion calculation; verify the line(s) used to compute the 3-year operating-cash-flow / net-profit ratio (reported as 6.84).
- Inspect the notes for receivables, prepayments and other long-term receivables (look for the schedule or note that discloses ‘loans to/from related parties’, ‘prepayments to suppliers’ and ‘other long-term receivables’) and confirm the 0.3% of total assets figure and the counters/related-party disclosures.
- Review the audited equity and accumulated-loss roll-forward or the statement of changes in equity to confirm accumulated losses = 0.09x paid-in capital and to verify that parent net profit shows 0 consecutive years of net loss up to FY2025.
- Open the exchange disclosure pack for director/insider registrations to confirm the 2 sale registrations (1,531,231 shares) and 5 purchase registrations (475,000 shares, one with no volume) and read the registrants’ stated intended volumes and timing.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
- P/B
- 0.63
- P/S
- 0.39
- ROE
- 0.8%
- ROA
- 0.3%
- EPS
- 70
- BVPS
- 9.151
- Gross Margin
- 10.3%
- Net Margin
- 0.5%
- D/E
- 1.51
- Current Ratio
- 1.09
- EV/EBITDA
- 11.79
- Div Yield
- —
Company Overview
- Shares outstanding
- 5.1M
- Charter Capital
- 50.6B VND
- Sector (ICB L2)
- Công nghệ Thông tin
- Industry (ICB L3)
- Thiết bị và Phần cứng
- Sub-industry
- Thiết bị viễn thông
- Company Type
- CT