DAH
CyclicalsValuation Breakdown
Cyclical companies (chemicals, oil & gas, basic resources) have earnings that swing dramatically with commodity prices and economic cycles. Valuing them on a single year's earnings is misleading: they look cheap at peaks and expensive at troughs. This model uses 7-year median EBITDA ("mid-cycle" earnings) and a 7-year median EV/EBITDA multiple to estimate what the firm is worth at a normal point in the cycle.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — DAH
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2024
DAH exhibits a Beneish M-Score of -3.5851, indicating a low likelihood of earnings manipulation. However, the high SGI of 1.5686 and low earnings quality metrics suggest potential concerns regarding revenue growth sustainability and margin pressures.
- SGI of 1.5686 indicates aggressive revenue growth which may not be sustainable.
- Low eq_margin and eq_revenue scores (0.0/100) raise concerns about profitability and revenue recognition practices.
- Beneish M-Score of -3.5851 suggests low likelihood of earnings manipulation.
- High eq_accrual score of 99.6/100 indicates strong accrual quality.
The ownership structure shows significant concentration with the top shareholder holding 17.8%, which could lead to potential governance issues and conflicts of interest.
Investors should closely monitor DAH's revenue growth and margin performance, considering a cautious approach until clearer signs of sustainable profitability emerge.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for DAH — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate