
NHA
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — NHA
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
The Beneish M-Score of -2.1758 indicates a lower risk of earnings manipulation, as it is below the manipulation threshold of -1.78. However, the high SGI of 1.8384 and low AQI of 1.1079 raise concerns about revenue growth sustainability and overall earnings quality.
- SGI of 1.8384 suggests aggressive revenue growth that may not be sustainable.
- Low AQI of 1.1079 indicates potential issues with earnings quality, particularly in margin and revenue metrics.
- Strong cash conversion rate of 100.0/100 indicates effective cash flow management.
- High eq_accrual score of 93.5/100 suggests that the company is managing its accruals effectively.
The ownership structure is concentrated, with the top shareholder holding 22.8%, which may lead to governance risks and potential conflicts of interest.
Investors should closely monitor revenue growth trends and earnings quality metrics, while considering a cautious approach due to ownership concentration risks.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for NHA — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate