
CIA
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — CIA
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
CIA exhibits a concerning risk of earnings manipulation as indicated by its Beneish M-Score of -2.3905, which is well below the manipulation threshold of -1.78. However, the company's strong earnings quality metrics, particularly in accruals and cash conversion, suggest a degree of operational integrity.
- Beneish M-Score of -2.3905 indicates potential earnings manipulation, significantly below the threshold of -1.78.
- SGI of 1.4408 suggests aggressive revenue growth which may not be sustainable.
- Earnings Quality Score of 70.3/100 reflects strong accruals (96.4/100) and cash conversion (98.0/100), indicating good operational performance.
- High receivables quality score of 100.0/100 suggests effective management of receivables.
The ownership structure is heavily concentrated, with institutional investors holding 51.6% and 51.0% of shares, which may lead to governance risks and potential conflicts of interest.
Investors should closely monitor CIA's revenue growth and consider a cautious approach, given the elevated risk of earnings manipulation while leveraging its strong cash conversion metrics.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for CIA — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate