
NAS
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — NAS
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2024
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2024
The Beneish M-Score of -2.2763 indicates a lower likelihood of earnings manipulation, as it is below the threshold of -1.78. However, the earnings quality score of 61.4/100, particularly low scores in revenue (19.2/100) and margin (0.0/100), raise concerns about the sustainability of earnings.
- Low revenue quality score of 19.2/100 suggests potential issues in revenue recognition.
- Earnings margin score of 0.0/100 indicates no profitability in earnings, which is a significant concern.
- Beneish M-Score of -2.2763 suggests a lower likelihood of earnings manipulation.
- High receivables quality score of 100.0/100 indicates strong management of receivables.
The ownership structure is heavily concentrated, with Tổng Công ty Hàng không Việt Nam holding 51.0%. This could lead to potential conflicts of interest and reduced shareholder influence on management decisions.
Investors should closely monitor revenue recognition practices and earnings sustainability. Consider a cautious approach, potentially waiting for improved earnings quality metrics before making significant investment decisions.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for NAS — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate