CYC
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — CYC
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2024
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2024
CYC exhibits several concerning financial metrics, particularly a high GMI of 5.6319, indicating potential earnings manipulation. The low earnings quality score of 29.9/100, driven by poor cash conversion and revenue metrics, further raises red flags about the sustainability of reported earnings.
- GMI of 5.6319 suggests significant earnings manipulation risk, well above typical thresholds.
- Earnings Quality Score of 29.9/100 indicates poor earnings quality, particularly driven by a cash conversion rate of only 9.6/100.
- DSRI of 0.7560 indicates that inventory is well managed relative to sales, which could suggest operational efficiency.
The high concentration of ownership by Chyih Investment Co., Ltd. at 78.0% poses a risk of governance issues, as minority shareholders may have limited influence over corporate decisions.
Investors should exercise caution and conduct further due diligence on CYC, particularly focusing on cash flow sustainability and governance practices before considering any investment.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for CYC — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate