
PIA
TechnologyValuation Breakdown
Technology companies combine high growth potential with the risk of overvaluation. This model blends DCF (60% weight, capturing long-duration growth) with a P/E sanity check (40% weight, capping speculative excess). The DCF uses the slowest growth decay (0.05) recognizing that tech companies can sustain competitive advantages longer. The P/E component applies a dynamic ceiling: max P/E = min(growth% x 1.5, 30), preventing runaway valuations.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — PIA
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
The Beneish M-Score of -2.6301 indicates a low likelihood of earnings manipulation, as it is well below the threshold of -1.78. However, the earnings quality metrics reveal significant concerns, particularly with a revenue quality score of 0.0/100, suggesting potential issues with revenue recognition.
- Revenue quality score of 0.0/100 indicates potential issues with revenue recognition.
- High concentration of ownership with 50.3% held by a single institution, which may lead to governance risks.
- Earnings Quality Score of 76.2/100 indicates overall strong earnings quality.
- Cash conversion rate of 100.0/100 suggests effective cash management.
The top shareholder holds 50.3% of the company, creating a risk of potential conflicts of interest and reduced shareholder influence on corporate governance.
Investors should closely monitor revenue recognition practices and consider diversifying their holdings to mitigate risks associated with concentrated ownership.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for PIA — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate