
HTV
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — HTV
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
HTV exhibits a Beneish M-Score of -2.7567, indicating a low likelihood of earnings manipulation. The earnings quality score of 71.1/100 reflects strong accruals and cash conversion metrics, although revenue and margin quality are concerning.
- SGAI at 1.0385 suggests potential inefficiencies in sales and administrative expenses.
- EQ margin of 26.6/100 indicates weak profitability relative to revenue.
- Strong accrual quality score of 98.5/100 indicates effective management of non-cash earnings.
- High receivables quality score of 100.0/100 suggests reliable collection practices.
The top shareholders include significant institutional ownership, with Tổng Công ty Xi măng Việt Nam holding 50.1%, which may provide stability but also indicates potential for concentrated decision-making.
Monitor the company's revenue quality closely, particularly given the low scores in margin and revenue metrics. Consider engaging with management to understand strategies for improving profitability.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for HTV — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate