
PMP
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — PMP
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
PMP exhibits a Beneish M-Score of -2.1674, indicating a low likelihood of earnings manipulation, as it falls below the manipulation threshold of -1.78. However, the high concentration of institutional ownership raises concerns about potential governance issues and conflicts of interest.
- High institutional ownership concentration: 43.3% by Tổng Công ty Phân bón và Hóa chất Dầu khí and 40.0% by Công Ty Trách Nhiệm Hữu Hạn Hương Phong, which may lead to lack of independent oversight.
- Strong earnings quality score of 84.7/100, with particularly high scores in accruals (95.3/100) and cash conversion (100.0/100), indicating robust financial health.
The top shareholders are predominantly institutions, which may lead to potential conflicts of interest and reduced accountability to minority shareholders.
Investors should closely monitor governance practices and consider diversifying their holdings to mitigate risks associated with high institutional ownership concentration.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for PMP — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate