SCS
CyclicalsValuation Breakdown
Cyclical companies (chemicals, oil & gas, basic resources) have earnings that swing dramatically with commodity prices and economic cycles. Valuing them on a single year's earnings is misleading: they look cheap at peaks and expensive at troughs. This model uses 7-year median EBITDA ("mid-cycle" earnings) and a 7-year median EV/EBITDA multiple to estimate what the firm is worth at a normal point in the cycle.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — SCS
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
SCS exhibits a Beneish M-Score of -2.3689, indicating no immediate signs of earnings manipulation, as it is below the manipulation threshold of -1.78. However, the SGI of 1.1541 suggests aggressive growth, which could pose risks if not supported by sustainable revenue.
- SGI of 1.1541 indicates aggressive growth that may not be sustainable.
- EQ Revenue score of 0.0/100 raises concerns about revenue recognition practices.
- Earnings Quality Score of 82.6/100 reflects strong overall earnings quality.
- High EQ Receivables score of 100.0/100 suggests effective management of receivables.
The top shareholders include significant institutional ownership, with Gemadept holding 33.4%, which may provide stability. However, the concentration of ownership could lead to governance risks if interests diverge.
Monitor the company's revenue recognition practices closely due to the low EQ Revenue score. Consider a cautious investment approach, given the aggressive growth indicated by the SGI.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for SCS — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate