STC
TechnologyValuation Breakdown
Technology companies combine high growth potential with the risk of overvaluation. This model blends DCF (60% weight, capturing long-duration growth) with a P/E sanity check (40% weight, capping speculative excess). The DCF uses the slowest growth decay (0.05) recognizing that tech companies can sustain competitive advantages longer. The P/E component applies a dynamic ceiling: max P/E = min(growth% x 1.5, 30), preventing runaway valuations.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — STC
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
STC exhibits signs of potential earnings manipulation with a Beneish M-Score of -2.3603, significantly below the manipulation threshold of -1.78. While the company shows strong earnings quality in terms of accruals and margins, the low revenue quality score raises concerns about the sustainability of reported earnings.
- Beneish M-Score of -2.3603 indicates potential earnings manipulation, as it is well below the threshold of -1.78.
- Revenue quality score of 0.0/100 suggests that reported revenues may not be reliable, raising concerns about the company's revenue recognition practices.
- Earnings Quality Score of 54.6/100 indicates a moderate level of earnings quality, with particularly strong accruals at 90.6/100 and margins at 100.0/100.
The top shareholder, Công ty TNHH MTV Nhà Xuất Bản Giáo Dục Việt Nam, holds a significant 52.5% stake, indicating potential concentration risk and limited minority shareholder influence.
Investors should closely monitor STC's revenue recognition practices and consider conducting further due diligence before making investment decisions, given the elevated risk of earnings manipulation.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for STC — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate