VNVALUEVNVALUE
Updated weekly
Back to Dashboard
Cyclicals sector

VEA

Cyclicals
Tổng Công ty Máy động lực và Máy nông nghiệp Việt Nam - CTCP
Hàng & Dịch vụ Công nghiệp/Công nghiệp nặngCT
33.400
VND · Last close
Valuation Verdict
Overvalued
Very Low
-120%Fair Value+120%
Intrinsic Value
30.630
Current
33.400
Gap
-8.3%
ModelEV EBITDA MIDCYCLE

Valuation Breakdown

CTHàng & Dịch vụ Công nghiệpCyclical
Classified as cyclical because ICB sector "Hàng & Dịch vụ Công nghiệp" maps to the cyclical group
ModelEV/EBITDA Mid-Cycle
Equity Value = Mid-Cycle EBITDA x Fair EV/EBITDA - Net Debt

Cyclical companies (chemicals, oil & gas, basic resources) have earnings that swing dramatically with commodity prices and economic cycles. Valuing them on a single year's earnings is misleading: they look cheap at peaks and expensive at troughs. This model uses 7-year median EBITDA ("mid-cycle" earnings) and a 7-year median EV/EBITDA multiple to estimate what the firm is worth at a normal point in the cycle.

1
Model Inputs
Mid-Cycle EBITDA268.94B
Fair EV/EBITDA150.3x
Years of data7
2
Valuation
Mid-Cycle EBITDA
268.94B
x
Fair EV/EBITDA
150.3x
-
Net Debt
-292.32B
=
Equity Value
30.630
Years of data7

Valuation Track Record

Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — VEA

Earnings Quality

Fiscal year 2025

36
Weak
Accrual Quality
18
Cash Conversion
0
Receivables
100
Margin Stability
100
Revenue Quality
0

Financial Forensics

Beneish M-Score · 2025

-1.16
High Risk
DSRI
1.031
GMI
0.996
AQI
0.979
SGI
1.088
DEPI
0.944
SGAI
1.019
TATA
0.262
LVGI
0.988

The forensic assessment of VEA indicates elevated risk primarily due to its earnings quality metrics and ownership structure. While the Beneish M-Score suggests no immediate signs of manipulation, the low earnings quality score and significant state ownership raise concerns about transparency and potential influence on financial reporting.

Red Flags
  • Earnings Quality Score of 35.5/100 indicates significant issues with earnings quality, particularly with cash conversion (0.0/100) and revenue recognition (0.0/100).
  • High state ownership at 88.5% may lead to potential conflicts of interest and reduced accountability in financial disclosures.
Positive Signals
  • Beneish M-Score of -1.1633 is below the manipulation threshold of -1.78, suggesting that the likelihood of earnings manipulation is low.
  • Strong receivables (100.0/100) and margin metrics (100.0/100) indicate effective management of these areas, which could support revenue generation.
Ownership Risk

The dominant state ownership (88.5%) presents a significant risk, as it may lead to less rigorous oversight and potential misalignment of interests between the state and minority shareholders.

Recommendation

Investors should proceed with caution, closely monitoring future earnings reports and cash flow statements. Engaging with management for clarity on revenue recognition practices and governance structures is advisable.

Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.

Quantitative Scores

F-Score
5/9
Neutral
Z-Score
23.06
Safe Zone
Sharpe
-0.27
Negative
Composite
40
Weak
Price Risk
Momentum
+9.6%
Volatility
27.7%
Max Drawdown
-14.3%

Key Ratios

Fiscal year 2025
6.42P/E
P/B1.74
P/S10.53
ROE27.6%
ROA26.1%
EPS5512.28
BVPS20314.20
Gross Margin15.3%
Net Margin164.0%
D/E0.05
Current Ratio15.50
Rev Growth8.7%
Profit Growth-0.5%
EV/EBITDA164.95
Div Yield0.0%

Company Overview

Issued Shares
1328.8M
Charter Capital
13288.0B VND
Sector (ICB L2)
Hàng & Dịch vụ Công nghiệp
Industry (ICB L3)
Công nghiệp nặng
Sub-industry
Máy công nghiệp
Company Type
CT

// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK

> mapping common ownership for VEA — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate

Shareholders
Ministry Of Industry And Trade Of The Socialist Republic Of Vietnam
State
88.5%
1.2 ty
Công Ty TNHH Thương Mại Đầu Tư Hòa Lợi
Inst
3.5%
46.3 trieu
PYN Elite Fund
Inst
3.0%
39.9 trieu
Công Ty TNHH Xây Dựng Và Dịch Vụ Thương Mại An Khang
Inst
1.3%
17.9 trieu
Board & Management
Đỗ Thu Hoàng
Người phụ trách quản trị công ty
Nguyễn Khắc Hải
Chủ tịch Hội đồng Quản trị
Đỗ Minh Tâm
Thành viên Ban Kiểm toán nội bộ
Hồ Mạnh Tuấn
Phó Tổng Giám đốc
Văn Đình Quân
Kế toán trưởng
Phan Phạm Hà
Tổng Giám đốc/Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị
Phan Kim Khoa
Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị độc lập
Đinh Thị Thanh Hải
Trưởng Ban Kiểm toán nội bộ
Nguyễn Thị Nga
Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị
Nguyễn Tiến Vỵ
Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị độc lập
Lê Thị Thanh Bình
Thành viên Ban kiểm soát
Nguyễn Thị Diên
Thành viên Ban kiểm soát
Lê Minh Quy
Phụ trách Công bố thông tin/Phó Tổng Giám đốc
Đặng Thị Thái Hà
Thành viên Ban Kiểm toán nội bộ
Vũ Thị Hồng Hạnh
Trưởng Ban kiểm soát
Computed 12/04/2026
Methodology & Disclosure

vnvalue is a methodology engine — not an advisor. Every number is the deterministic output of a published formula applied to public financial data. Nothing on this page constitutes investment, financial, legal, or tax advice, nor a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security.

All data, models, and outputs are provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions. Past performance and historical valuations are not indicative of future results.

By using vnvalue you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Full disclaimer →