CII
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — CII
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
CII exhibits a Beneish M-Score of -2.5952, indicating a low likelihood of earnings manipulation. However, the earnings quality score of 33.4/100, particularly low cash conversion and revenue metrics, raises concerns about the sustainability of reported earnings.
- Earnings Quality Score of 33.4/100, with cash conversion at 0.0/100, suggesting significant discrepancies between reported earnings and actual cash flows.
- Receivables quality score at 24.8/100 indicates potential issues in revenue recognition and collection efficiency.
- Beneish M-Score of -2.5952, well below the manipulation threshold of -1.78, suggesting lower risk of earnings manipulation.
- DSRI at 0.8041 indicates a decrease in receivables relative to sales, which could imply improved efficiency in managing accounts receivable.
The ownership structure is relatively fragmented with no single entity holding a controlling stake, which may mitigate risks of management entrenchment but could also lead to less accountability.
Investors should closely monitor cash flow performance and receivables management while considering a cautious approach to investment in CII due to the low earnings quality score.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for CII — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate