
VFR
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — VFR
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
VFR's Beneish M-Score of -2.3133 indicates a low likelihood of earnings manipulation, as it is below the threshold of -1.78. However, the earnings quality score of 33.2/100, particularly the cash conversion score of 0.0/100, raises concerns about the sustainability of reported earnings.
- Earnings Quality Score of 33.2/100, with a cash conversion score of 0.0/100 indicating severe issues in converting earnings to cash.
- Significant SGI of 1.2755 suggests aggressive growth that may not be supported by actual cash flows.
- Beneish M-Score of -2.3133 indicates a low likelihood of earnings manipulation, suggesting a degree of reliability in reported earnings.
- High receivables score of 100.0/100 indicates effective management of receivables, which is a positive sign for liquidity.
The ownership structure is concentrated, with the top five shareholders holding over 75% of the shares, which may lead to governance risks and potential conflicts of interest.
Investors should closely monitor cash flow metrics and consider a deeper analysis of revenue recognition practices before making investment decisions. A cautious approach is advised given the elevated risk profile.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for VFR — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate