VNVALUEVNVALUE
Updated weekly
Back to Dashboard
Cyclicals sector

PTM

Cyclicals
Công ty Cổ phần Sản xuất, Thương mại Và Dịch vụ Ô tô PTM
Ô tô và phụ tùngCT
16.000
VND · Last close
Valuation Verdict
Overvalued
Very Low
-120%Fair Value+120%
Intrinsic Value
10.103
Current
16.000
Gap
-36.9%
ModelEV EBITDA MIDCYCLE

Valuation Breakdown

CTCyclical
Defaulted to cyclical (no specific sector mapping found)
ModelEV/EBITDA Mid-Cycle
Equity Value = Mid-Cycle EBITDA x Fair EV/EBITDA - Net Debt

Cyclical companies (chemicals, oil & gas, basic resources) have earnings that swing dramatically with commodity prices and economic cycles. Valuing them on a single year's earnings is misleading: they look cheap at peaks and expensive at troughs. This model uses 7-year median EBITDA ("mid-cycle" earnings) and a 7-year median EV/EBITDA multiple to estimate what the firm is worth at a normal point in the cycle.

1
Model Inputs
Mid-Cycle EBITDA88.45B
Fair EV/EBITDA5.0x
Years of data4
2
Valuation
Mid-Cycle EBITDA
88.45B
x
Fair EV/EBITDA
5.0x
-
Net Debt
118.94B
=
Equity Value
10.103
Years of data4

Valuation Track Record

Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — PTM

Earnings Quality

Fiscal year 2025

7
Poor
Accrual Quality
16
Cash Conversion
0
Receivables
0
Margin Stability
13
Revenue Quality
8

Financial Forensics

Beneish M-Score · 2025

-0.09
High Risk
DSRI
0.672
GMI
1.407
AQI
4.808
SGI
0.922
DEPI
0.644
SGAI
1.480
TATA
0.281
LVGI
1.562

PTM exhibits several concerning financial metrics indicative of potential earnings manipulation, particularly highlighted by its Beneish M-Score of -0.0905, which is well above the manipulation threshold. Additionally, the low earnings quality score of 6.9/100, particularly the cash conversion score of 0.0/100, raises significant concerns about the sustainability of reported earnings.

Red Flags
  • Beneish M-Score of -0.0905, indicating potential earnings manipulation as it is above the threshold of -1.78.
  • Earnings Quality Score of 6.9/100, with an accrual score of 15.9/100 and cash conversion score of 0.0/100, suggesting poor earnings quality and potential overstatement of earnings.
  • SGA ratio of 1.4803, indicating that selling, general, and administrative expenses are rising faster than sales, which could signal inefficiency or potential earnings management.
Positive Signals
  • DSRI of 0.6719, indicating that inventory is being managed effectively relative to sales, which is a positive operational signal.
  • SGI of 0.9219 suggests that the company is not overextending itself in terms of growth, which could mitigate some risks associated with aggressive expansion.
Ownership Risk

The ownership structure is heavily concentrated, with the top shareholder holding 51.6% of the shares, which could lead to governance issues and potential conflicts of interest. The dominance of institutional and individual shareholders may limit minority shareholder influence.

Recommendation

Investors should exercise caution and conduct further due diligence before considering an investment in PTM, particularly focusing on cash flow sustainability and management practices. Monitoring future earnings reports for improvements in cash conversion and overall earnings quality is crucial.

Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.

Quantitative Scores

F-Score
1/9
Weak
Z-Score
3.96
Safe Zone
Sharpe
0.18
Positive
Composite
35
Weak
Price Risk
Momentum
+34.6%
Volatility
73.7%
Max Drawdown
-82.7%

Key Ratios

Fiscal year 2025
11.59P/E
P/B0.88
P/S0.32
ROE7.7%
ROA5.8%
EPS1121.72
BVPS14698.57
Gross Margin12.8%
Net Margin2.8%
D/E0.42
Current Ratio2.15
Rev Growth-7.8%
Profit Growth-72.0%
EV/EBITDA17.55
Div Yield0.0%

Company Overview

Issued Shares
32.0M
Charter Capital
320.0B VND
Sector (ICB L2)
Ô tô và phụ tùng
Industry (ICB L3)
Ô tô và phụ tùng
Sub-industry
Sản xuất ô tô
Company Type
CT

// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK

> mapping common ownership for PTM — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate

Shareholders
Công ty Cổ phần Dịch vụ Ô tô Hàng Xanh
Inst
51.6%
16.5 trieu
Hoàng Đức Thành
Indiv
24.1%
1.0 trieu
Vũ Thị Hạnh
Indiv
11.3%
3.6 trieu
Trần Thị Bảo Hiền
Indiv
6.7%
279.215
Nguyễn Thị Liên
Indiv
6.3%
2.0 trieu
Vũ Quang Huy
Indiv
6.0%
250.000
Tạ Thị Ngọc Thanh
Indiv
5.0%
207.875
Trần Văn Mỹ
Indiv
4.7%
1.5 trieu
Phan Văn Đạo
Indiv
3.0%
124.867
Hoàng Đức Hùng
Indiv
2.8%
899.900
Nguyễn Thị Thanh Hằng
Indiv
1.6%
500.000
Nguyễn Đức Minh
Indiv
1.4%
59.900
Trần Thị Kim Quế
Indiv
1.2%
50.100
Bùi Toàn Thắng
Indiv
1.0%
42.000
Nguyễn Thị Thúy Hạnh
Indiv
0.8%
35.000
Vũ Ngọc Diệp Linh
Indiv
0.8%
242.400
Đỗ Ngọc Thùy Trang
Indiv
0.6%
200.000
Phạm Thị Bán
Indiv
0.6%
200.000
Lê Thị Huyên
Indiv
0.2%
50.000
Nguyễn Thế Sơn
Indiv
0.1%
5.550
Board & Management
Hoàng Đức Thành24.1%
Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị
Tạ Thị Ngọc Thanh9.4%
Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị
Trần Thị Bảo Hiền6.7%
Thành viên Ban kiểm soát
Vũ Quang Huy6.0%
Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị
Hoàng Đức Hùng2.8%
Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị
Nguyễn Thị Thúy Hạnh0.8%
Thành viên Ban kiểm soát
Đào Thị Hà Thuý
Thành viên Ban kiểm soát
Trịnh Quốc Bảo
Thành viên Ban kiểm soát
Vũ Ngọc Hiến
Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị
Đỗ Tiến Dũng
Chủ tịch Hội đồng Quản trị/Tổng Giám đốc
Lê Việt Dũng
Phụ trách Công bố thông tin
Lương Phúc Thọ
Thành viên Ban kiểm soát
Đặng Văn Tuấn
Phó Tổng Giám đốc
Phạm Thị Nhung
Thành viên Ban kiểm soát
Trần Văn Mỹ
Tổng Giám đốc/Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị
Trần Quốc Hải
Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị
Computed 12/04/2026
Methodology & Disclosure

vnvalue is a methodology engine — not an advisor. Every number is the deterministic output of a published formula applied to public financial data. Nothing on this page constitutes investment, financial, legal, or tax advice, nor a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security.

All data, models, and outputs are provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions. Past performance and historical valuations are not indicative of future results.

By using vnvalue you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Full disclaimer →