
CTI
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — CTI
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
CTI exhibits a Beneish M-Score of -2.037, indicating a low likelihood of earnings manipulation. However, the earnings quality metrics show concerns, particularly with a revenue quality score of 0.0/100, which raises questions about the sustainability of reported earnings.
- Revenue quality score of 0.0/100 suggests potential issues with revenue recognition or reporting.
- SGI of 1.3300 indicates aggressive growth that may not be supported by underlying fundamentals.
- Earnings Quality Score of 79.3/100 reflects strong cash conversion and receivables management.
- DSRI of 1.2464, while above 1, is not excessively high, indicating manageable inventory levels relative to sales.
The top shareholders are a mix of institutional and individual investors, with no single entity holding a controlling stake. This diversified ownership structure may mitigate risks associated with governance and decision-making.
Investors should closely monitor revenue recognition practices and consider the implications of the low revenue quality score. A cautious approach is advised, potentially waiting for clearer signals of sustainable earnings growth before making significant investments.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for CTI — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate