
ICN
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — ICN
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
ICN demonstrates a concerning Beneish M-Score of -2.4135, indicating potential earnings manipulation, particularly with a high SGAI of 1.4749. Although the earnings quality score is moderate at 52.0, the extremely low scores in receivables and revenue raise significant red flags.
- Beneish M-Score of -2.4135 indicates potential earnings manipulation, exceeding the threshold of -1.78.
- SGAI at 1.4749 suggests excessive selling, which could indicate aggressive revenue recognition practices.
- Earnings quality metrics show 0.0/100 for eq_receivables and eq_revenue, indicating potential issues with revenue recognition and cash flow.
- High eq_accrual score of 90.5/100 suggests strong accruals management.
- Ownership by major institutional shareholders, including Tổng Công ty IDICO at 51.0%, may provide stability and oversight.
The concentrated ownership structure, with 73.8% held by the top two institutional shareholders, may lead to governance risks and reduced minority shareholder influence.
Investors should exercise caution due to the elevated risk of earnings manipulation and consider closely monitoring future earnings reports and cash flow statements.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for ICN — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate