DPG
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — DPG
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
DPG's Beneish M-Score of -1.3475 indicates a low likelihood of earnings manipulation, as it is well above the manipulation threshold of -1.78. However, the earnings quality score of 47.6/100, particularly the cash conversion score of 0.0/100, raises concerns about the sustainability of reported earnings.
- Earnings Quality Score of 47.6/100 indicates potential issues with earnings sustainability.
- Cash conversion score of 0.0/100 suggests that earnings are not translating into cash flow, which is a significant risk.
- Beneish M-Score of -1.3475 is above the manipulation threshold, indicating a lower risk of earnings manipulation.
- Receivables quality score of 100.0/100 suggests strong management of receivables, which is a positive sign for cash flow.
The ownership structure is highly concentrated with the top five shareholders holding a combined 37.3%, which may lead to governance risks and potential conflicts of interest.
Investors should closely monitor cash flow performance and consider the implications of the concentrated ownership structure before making investment decisions.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for DPG — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate