FOC
TechnologyValuation Breakdown
Technology companies combine high growth potential with the risk of overvaluation. This model blends DCF (60% weight, capturing long-duration growth) with a P/E sanity check (40% weight, capping speculative excess). The DCF uses the slowest growth decay (0.05) recognizing that tech companies can sustain competitive advantages longer. The P/E component applies a dynamic ceiling: max P/E = min(growth% x 1.5, 30), preventing runaway valuations.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — FOC
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
The Beneish M-Score of -2.1455 indicates a low likelihood of earnings manipulation, as it is below the threshold of -1.78. However, the earnings quality score of 68.3 suggests potential concerns, particularly with cash conversion and revenue recognition.
- Earnings Quality Score of 68.3 indicates moderate risk, particularly due to a cash conversion score of 54.1, suggesting potential issues in converting earnings to cash.
- The revenue quality score of 0.0/100 raises significant concerns about the reliability of reported revenues.
- Beneish M-Score of -2.1455 is below the manipulation threshold, indicating less likelihood of earnings manipulation.
- Strong receivables and margin scores of 100.0/100 suggest effective management in these areas.
The top three shareholders control 85.1% of the company, indicating a high concentration of ownership that may lead to governance risks and potential conflicts of interest.
Investors should closely monitor cash flow performance and revenue recognition practices, while considering a cautious approach due to ownership concentration risks.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for FOC — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate