
ICG
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — ICG
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
The Beneish M-Score of 5.6739 indicates a high likelihood of earnings manipulation, significantly exceeding the threshold of -1.78. Coupled with a low Earnings Quality Score of 31.0/100, particularly concerning metrics like receivables and margin, this stock presents substantial red flags for potential investors.
- Beneish M-Score of 5.6739 indicates likely earnings manipulation.
- Earnings Quality Score of 31.0/100, with 0.0/100 in receivables and margin metrics, suggests poor earnings quality.
- DSRI of 11.9996 indicates significant inventory growth relative to sales, which may signal overstatement of revenue.
- Cash conversion metric of 100.0/100 indicates strong cash flow relative to earnings.
- Institutional ownership of 23.3% may provide some level of oversight and governance.
The top shareholders include a mix of individuals and institutions, with the largest individual holding at 17.0%. This concentrated ownership may lead to governance risks and potential conflicts of interest.
Given the high risk of earnings manipulation and poor earnings quality, it is advisable to exercise caution and consider avoiding investment in ICG until clearer financial transparency is established.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for ICG — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate