PXI
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — PXI
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
The Beneish M-Score of 0.5787 is above the manipulation threshold of -1.78, indicating potential earnings manipulation. Additionally, the earnings quality score of 44.5/100, particularly low cash conversion and revenue metrics, raises concerns about the sustainability of reported earnings.
- Beneish M-Score of 0.5787 suggests potential earnings manipulation, as it is above the threshold of -1.78.
- Earnings Quality Score of 44.5/100, with cash conversion at 0.0/100 and revenue metrics also at 0.0/100, indicates significant issues with earnings sustainability.
- DSRI of 0.2619 indicates that the company's inventory is well-managed compared to sales, which is a positive signal.
- High receivables quality score of 100.0/100 suggests that the company is effectively managing its receivables.
The top shareholder, Tổng Công ty Cổ phần Xây lắp Dầu khí Việt Nam, holds 51.0% of shares, indicating a strong influence over corporate decisions, which may pose risks related to governance and minority shareholder interests.
Investors should conduct further due diligence on PXI's financial practices and consider monitoring cash flow and revenue recognition closely before making investment decisions.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for PXI — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate