
PDV
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — PDV
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
PDV exhibits a concerning Beneish M-Score of -2.4348, indicating potential earnings manipulation. While the earnings quality score is relatively strong at 63.1, specific metrics such as the accrual score suggest weaknesses in earnings sustainability.
- Beneish M-Score of -2.4348, significantly below the manipulation threshold of -1.78, indicating a high likelihood of earnings manipulation.
- Earnings quality accrual score of 42.3/100, suggesting potential issues with the quality of earnings reported.
- Cash conversion score of 100.0/100 indicates strong cash flow generation relative to earnings.
- Top institutional ownership at 74.7% (51.9% + 22.8%) suggests a level of stability and confidence from larger investors.
The high concentration of ownership among a few institutions (74.7%) may lead to governance risks, as decisions may favor the interests of these shareholders over minority investors.
Investors should closely monitor PDV's financial disclosures for signs of earnings manipulation and consider a cautious approach due to the elevated risk level. Engaging with management regarding earnings quality metrics could provide further clarity.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for PDV — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate