
GSP
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — GSP
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
GSP shows a Beneish M-Score of -1.3645, indicating a lower likelihood of earnings manipulation, as it is above the threshold of -1.78. However, the earnings quality score of 72.1 suggests some areas of concern, particularly in revenue recognition and profit margins.
- SGI of 1.5954 indicates aggressive sales growth which may not be sustainable.
- EQ margin of 54.0/100 is low, suggesting potential issues with profitability.
- EQ revenue score of 2.9/100 raises concerns about revenue recognition practices.
- High cash conversion score of 100.0/100 indicates strong cash flow management.
- Ownership concentration with 68.0% held by a state-owned enterprise may provide stability.
The high concentration of ownership by Tổng Công ty Cổ phần Vận tải Dầu khí (68.0%) may limit minority shareholder influence and increase risks related to governance and transparency.
Investors should closely monitor revenue recognition practices and profitability metrics while considering a cautious approach due to ownership concentration risks.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for GSP — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate