PVV
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — PVV
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
The Beneish M-Score of -2.2657 indicates a lower likelihood of earnings manipulation, but the high GMI of 2.2282 raises concerns about potential revenue recognition issues. Additionally, the earnings quality score of 63.3/100 reflects mixed performance, particularly with zero scores in revenue and margin quality.
- GMI of 2.2282 suggests potential issues with revenue recognition, which is critical in the Vietnamese market context.
- Earnings quality metrics show a score of 0.0/100 for both revenue and margin quality, indicating significant concerns about the sustainability of earnings.
- The DSRI of 0.7860 indicates that accounts receivable are growing slower than sales, which is a positive sign for cash flow.
- The cash conversion score of 100.0/100 suggests strong cash flow generation relative to earnings.
The top shareholders include significant institutional ownership (35.7% combined), which may provide stability; however, the presence of individual shareholders with substantial stakes could lead to potential governance issues.
Investors should closely monitor revenue recognition practices and consider a deeper analysis of cash flow sustainability before making investment decisions.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for PVV — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate