VNVALUEVNVALUE
Updated weekly
Back to Dashboard
Construction sector

QHD

Construction
Công ty Cổ phần Que hàn điện Việt Đức
Hàng & Dịch vụ Công nghiệp/Hàng công nghiệpCT
54.000
VND · Last close
Valuation Verdict
Overvalued
Low
-120%Fair Value+120%
Intrinsic Value
29.253
Current
54.000
Gap
-45.8%
ModelEV EBITDA DCF BLEND

Valuation Breakdown

CTHàng & Dịch vụ Công nghiệpConstruction
Classified as construction because ICB sector "Hàng & Dịch vụ Công nghiệp" maps to the construction group
ModelEV/EBITDA + DCF Blend
Intrinsic = 50% x EV/EBITDA Value + 50% x DCF Value

Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.

1
Weighted Avg Cost of Capital
Risk-Free (Rf)
4.50%
+
Betasector default
1.100
x
ERP
4.25%
+
CRP
2.75%
=
Cost of Equity (Ke)
12.20%
Ke
12.20%
x
E/(D+E)
68.03%
+
Kd(1-t)
6.38%
x
D/(D+E)
31.97%
=
WACC
10.34%
2
Growth Estimate
fundamental firm blend9.70%
Growth decays 12%/yr toward terminal
3
Model Inputs
4
Valuation
50%EV/EBITDA Value
35.556
50%DCF Value
22.950
Blended Intrinsic
29.253
Value Decomposition
35%
65%
Explicit period (35%)Terminal value (65%)

Valuation Track Record

Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — QHD

Earnings Quality

Fiscal year 2025

74
Good
Accrual Quality
96
Cash Conversion
74
Receivables
100
Margin Stability
42
Revenue Quality
37

Financial Forensics

Beneish M-Score · 2020

-2.04
Moderate
DSRI
0.980
GMI
0.692
AQI
0.896
SGI
1.137
DEPI
0.900
SGAI
0.911
TATA
0.097
LVGI
0.730

The Beneish M-Score of -2.0366 indicates a low likelihood of earnings manipulation, as it is below the manipulation threshold of -1.78. However, the earnings quality score of 58.8/100, particularly low cash conversion (46.5/100) and zero margin quality (0.0/100), raises concerns about the sustainability of earnings.

Red Flags
  • Earnings quality score of 58.8/100 indicates potential issues with cash conversion and margin quality, which could affect future profitability.
  • The SGI of 1.1373 suggests that sales growth is outpacing industry norms, which may indicate aggressive revenue recognition practices.
Positive Signals
  • The DSRI of 0.9799 indicates that accounts receivable are in line with sales, suggesting no immediate red flags regarding revenue recognition.
  • The high receivables quality score of 100.0/100 indicates strong management of receivables, which is a positive sign for cash flow.
Ownership Risk

The top shareholders are individuals with significant stakes, which may lead to concentrated control and potential governance issues. However, the diversity among individual shareholders may mitigate some risks associated with ownership concentration.

Recommendation

Investors should closely monitor the company's cash conversion and margin quality metrics while considering a cautious approach to investment, given the elevated risk level. A deeper analysis of revenue recognition practices is recommended to ensure long-term sustainability.

Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.

Quantitative Scores

F-Score
6/9
Neutral
Z-Score
6.86
Safe Zone
Sharpe
1.68
Excellent
Composite
65
Fair
Price Risk
Momentum
+70.4%
Volatility
53.6%
Max Drawdown
-16.3%

Key Ratios

Fiscal year 2025
14.68P/E
P/B2.81
P/S0.81
ROE20.2%
ROA13.6%
EPS3678.06
BVPS19194.69
Gross Margin15.6%
Net Margin5.5%
D/E0.49
Current Ratio2.51
Rev Growth23.8%
Profit Growth80.9%
EV/EBITDA9.72
Div Yield3.1%

Company Overview

Issued Shares
6.6M
Charter Capital
66.3B VND
Sector (ICB L2)
Hàng & Dịch vụ Công nghiệp
Industry (ICB L3)
Hàng công nghiệp
Sub-industry
Công nghiệp phức hợp
Company Type
CT

// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK

> mapping common ownership for QHD — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate

Shareholders
Ngô Văn Hùng
Indiv
12.6%
696.114
Phạm Văn Tư
Indiv
7.3%
312.563
Ngô Bá Việt
Indiv
5.2%
284.645
Ngô Duy Đông
Indiv
4.9%
270.925
Ngô Huy Đông
Indiv
4.9%
208.404
Phạm Hà Phương
Indiv
3.2%
135.000
Nguyễn Huy Tiến
Indiv
1.3%
71.363
Hoàng Xuân Thành
Indiv
0.5%
28.077
Nguyễn Thanh Khán
Indiv
0.4%
20.278
Đặng Quốc Dũng
Indiv
0.3%
15.000
Nguyễn Thị Quý
Indiv
0.2%
11.698
Đặng Trần Lương
Indiv
0.2%
7.794
Bùi Hồng Sơn
Indiv
0.2%
9.057
Trần Văn Sơn
Indiv
0.1%
6.000
Phạm Văn Chương
Indiv
0.1%
4.590
Board & Management
Ngô Bá Việt5.2%
Chủ tịch Hội đồng Quản trị
Ngô Duy Đông4.9%
Phó Giám đốc Kinh doanh/Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị
Nguyễn Huy Tiến1.3%
Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị/Giám đốc
Hoàng Xuân Thành0.5%
Phụ trách Công bố thông tin/Kế toán trưởng
Đặng Quốc Dũng0.3%
Thành viên Ban kiểm soát
Nguyễn Quốc Thành
Phó Giám đốc Kỹ thuật/Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị
Lê Mạnh Hùng
Thành viên Ban kiểm soát
Thái Thị Hồng Loan
Thành viên Ban kiểm soát
Nguyễn Hữu Mải
Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị
Computed 12/04/2026
Methodology & Disclosure

vnvalue is a methodology engine — not an advisor. Every number is the deterministic output of a published formula applied to public financial data. Nothing on this page constitutes investment, financial, legal, or tax advice, nor a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security.

All data, models, and outputs are provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions. Past performance and historical valuations are not indicative of future results.

By using vnvalue you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Full disclaimer →