
NTP
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — NTP
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
NTP exhibits a Beneish M-Score of -2.2282, indicating a low likelihood of earnings manipulation. However, the SGI of 1.1934 suggests aggressive revenue growth that may not be supported by cash flow, raising concerns about sustainability.
- SGI of 1.1934 indicates aggressive revenue growth that may not be sustainable.
- Earnings Quality Score of 74.9/100, particularly low eq_revenue score of 0.0/100, raises concerns about the reliability of reported revenues.
- Beneish M-Score of -2.2282 suggests low likelihood of earnings manipulation.
- Strong eq_accrual score of 95.5/100 indicates good earnings quality in terms of accruals.
The significant state ownership at 37.1% may lead to potential conflicts of interest and influence over corporate governance, impacting minority shareholders.
Monitor revenue growth closely, especially given the high SGI, and consider engaging with management for clarity on revenue recognition practices. Maintain a cautious approach due to elevated risks associated with ownership structure.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for NTP — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate